6 min read

Nuremberg Code Outlaws ForcedMedical Procedures

Anna Von Reitz - 3 Jan /2021
paulstramer.net - Mon, 30 Nov 2020 10:04 UTC

Plague of Liars: Nuremberg Code Outlaws Forced
Medical Procedures, Which INCLUDES Mandatory

Some people might not be familiar with the verb “to dissemble”, but we all
need to become familiar with it, because there is a lot of dissembling going

It basically means to deliberately conceal something or obfuscate it, so that
one’s attention is misdirected or deflected from whatever the Dissembler
wishes to obscure. Like the truth. And in this case, the truth about the
© US Army

The ‘Doctors Trial’ (USA vs Karl Brandt) during the Nuremberg Trials
following WW2, which established the Nuremberg Code regulating the
ethics of medical intervention

1/13/2021 - Nuremberg Code and the protection it provides us from accepting any
forced medical procedure or therapy at all. Together with casting doubts and slander, dissembling is one of the chief tools in the propagandist toolbox.
A few days ago, I wrote an article explaining that forced vaccinations are a
violation of the Nuremberg Code. Note the word, “forced”. In fact, any forced
medical procedure or therapy is against the Nuremberg Code.

All medical procedures and therapies must have fully informed and freely
given consent, to the greatest extent possible – which means that people who
are conscious and able to decide things for themselves remain in control of
their medical destiny. It’s only when you are in desperate straits and unconscious that medical professionals are allowed to step in and make decisions “for you”.
This is all cut and dried and set in cement since the 1940s, but now we have
people trying to dissemble it and water it down and reinterpret the Nuremberg
Code as applying only to medical experimentation.

It does not.

The Code itself explains exactly what it applies to, and even though the cases
giving rise to the Code arose from medical experiments in Concentration
Camps and involved forced medical experimentation on unwilling subjects,
the core of the Nuremberg Code rose to the occasion and outlawed all
kinds of forced medical procedures and therapies. Not just experimental

Any medical procedure or therapy that you don’t want to participate in,
you have the full, free, and unprejudiced right to refuse. Period.
Go back and read Article 6, Sections 1 and 3, of the Nuremberg Code for

Don’t take anyone else’s word for it. Not even mine. Be sure. And make good
use of the information if anyone comes to your door with a needle in hand.

1/13/2021 - Another good one to quote in their faces is their own cherished Roe vs.
Wade decision, the excuse for allowing abortion on demand. My body, my choice. That applies to every aspect of your body, what you take out and what you put into it, too. Here is an example of a dissembling ‘news’ article so that you can see
exactly how they dissemble the actual important information and misrepresent it to mean something else:

The same article draws attention to the fact that the Nuremberg Code doesn’t
make vaccination illegal. Who said it did? They are deliberately creating a
False Argument as a means to obfuscate. © boomlive.in

1/13/2021 - The Nuremberg Code makes FORCED vaccination illegal – along with all other forced medical procedures and therapies. The Nuremberg Code doesn’t single out vaccinations or any other procedure or therapy – itoutlaws all forced procedures and therapies with the same broad brush.

So if you want to be vaccinated, after being fully informed of all the possible
downsides and consequences, after understanding exactly what the vaccine
contains, after understanding that you will have extremely limited rights of
recourse if you voluntarily take the injection and something goes wrong –
then you are free to take your chances and do as you will. It’s your choice.
The Nuremberg Code won’t protect you from your own fully disclosed

But it will protect you from being imposed upon by politicians and “private
security forces” hired by banks that are colluding in this scheme to defraud
America under color of law. The Nuremberg Code gives you full standing, if they attempt to violate it and force any kind of involuntary or undisclosed vaccination on you by any means – whether by wrestling you to the ground or by threatening
to deprive you of any other right or privilege, including the right to travel and use public facilities.

All indications are that we are entering a very dark chapter in American
history. You will need to stay alert and stay informed, and you are not being
given straight information from any of the commercial media channels or their
acolytes and paid trolls. You need to read things with a critical eye and be
able to discern the tricks the propagandists employ.

Now read the actual Nuremberg Code Sections – Article 6, Sections 1 and 3.
Then stand your solid ground against forced medical procedures of any kind
and also against all the dissembling BS artists out there, because they are
multiplying like bunnies in spring.

1/13/2021 - The Nuremberg Code and the ethics against the upcoming forceful vaccinochipization

You can take a stand against this Plague of Liars, by joining other like-minded and alert Americans who have reclaimed their birthright political standing and who are now undertaking the responsibility of self-governance – concerning their health and all other matters – via their State Assembly.

1/13/2021 - Vaccination / chipization is moving by leaps and bounds and people
around the world are already starting to think about how to avoid this
miraculous manipulation. Of course, no one knows the laws, but in
different countries the laws are also different.

1/13/2021 - During the experiment, the subject should be able to stop him if, in his opinion, his physical or mental state makes it impossible to continue the experiment. 10. During the experiment, the researcher responsible for carrying out the experiment should be prepared to terminate it at any stage if professional considerations, conscientiousness and caution in the judgments required of it, give reason to believe that the continuation of the experiment may lead to injury, disability or death test subject.

As American lawyers write, the key points are 1 and 6 – that is, the person involved
in the vaccination must be capable to give consent; a person should be able to
exercise freedom of choice, without the intervention of any element of force,
deception, coercion, direct or hidden; the person must possess sufficient knowledge and understanding of the elements of the subject in question. The next universal legal document is called Article 6 of the 2005 UNESCO statement on bioethics and human rights.

It is written there: Article 6, section 1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical interventions should be carried out only with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned on the basis of adequate information. If necessary, consent must be expressed and can be revoked by the person concerned at any time and for any reason.

Article 6, section 3: In no case shall the collective agreement of the
community or the consent of the community leader or other authority be a
substitute for the informed consent of individuals. Thus, any orders of a particular Parliament or a celebrated supreme leader on compulsory vaccination will violate Article 6 of the UNESCO statement on human rights and bioethics. Along the way, they violate the Nuremberg Code, in particular Article 1 and Article 6.

It is still unknown how the authorities of different countries will try to circumvent these fundamental ethical issues.


Copy & Paste lenken øverst for Yandex oversettelse til Norsk.

WHO and WHAT is behind it all ? : >


The bottom line is for the people to regain their original, moral principles, which have intentionally been watered out over the past generations by our press, TV, and other media owned by the Illuminati/Bilderberger Group, corrupting our morals by making misbehaviour acceptable to our society. Only in this way shall we conquer this oncoming wave of evil.




All articles contained in Human-Synthesis are freely available and collected from the Internet. The interpretation of the contents is left to the readers and do not necessarily represent the views of the Administrator. Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). Human-Synthesis will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. Human-Synthesis grants permission to cross-post original Human-Synthesis articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified.

The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication of Human-Synthesis articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites. Human-Synthesis contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.