4 min read

Biden Campaign Operative, Texas State Senator Accused of Mail-in Ballot Fraud


Photo by Lindsey Bieda

THE TEXAN - AND - SEP. 28, 2020

Witnesses allege Texas Sen. Boris Miles and Harris County Commissioner Rodney Ellis were orchestrating a ballot harvesting scheme with help from Biden campaign official Dallas Jones.

New affidavits filed with the Supreme Court of Texas (SCOTX) Monday allege a coordinated ballot harvesting operation in Harris County.

The two testimonials specifically name state Senator Boris Miles (D-Houston) and Harris County Commissioner Rodney Ellis (D-Pct. 1) as leaders of an election fraud scheme that involves stealing absentee ballots from nursing homes and forging voter signatures.

Another individual named is Dallas Jones, a political operative overseeing Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden’s Harris County operation.

First reported by National File, the witness testimony included in the affidavits were submitted in conjunction with a lawsuit filed by conservative activist Steven Hotze and others.

A former FBI agent and now private investigator writes in his sworn testimony that he has investigated ballot harvesting allegations since December of 2019 after two individuals told him they had witnessed illegal ballot harvesting activity.

The investigator says that witnesses have accused Miles and Ellis of orchestrating the scheme, and allege that the two are assisted by Houston businessman Gerald Womack and political consultant Dallas Jones, who they describe as “chief lieutenants.”

Dallas Jones previously served as district director for both state Rep. Garnet Coleman (D-Houston) and then state Senator Rodney Ellis, but was recently named the Texas political director for the Biden-Harris presidential campaign.

According to the testimony, ballot harvesters collect absentee ballots from “the elderly in nursing homes, from the homeless, and from unsuspecting residences’ mailboxes.” They then complete the ballots and forge the signature of the voter.

Witnesses also told the investigator that two employees in the Harris County Clerk’s office are facilitating the operation and working to mix the forged ballots in with legally submitted ballots.

The affidavit also alleges that previous county Clerk Diane Trautman, who abruptly resigned in May, was aware of the illegal activities and investigation and told Ellis she was concerned about being arrested for election fraud.

The other testimony, delivered by a former Houston police officer, asserts explicitly that he has videotaped corroboration of these claims.

Mail-in ballots have become a flashpoint issue as officials have issued orders that would enable voters to avoid visiting precincts in person. Opponents, including Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, warn that voter fraud will compound along with a mail-in voting expansion.

The attorney general’s office has prosecuted 457 instances of fraud since 2004. Voter fraud occurs, but it is generally not carried out to the extent necessary to swing something like a presidential election.

However, it can swing lower-level races that have much smaller margins. For example, last week a Gregg County commissioner and his conspirators were indicted on 137 counts of voter fraud during a 2018 primary election the official won by only five votes.

Earlier this year, the Texas Secretary of State referred a complaint of ballot harvesting in Harris County uncovered by local activist Colleen Vera to Paxton’s office for a full investigation.

Tangentially, Harris County Interim Clerk Chris Hollins has been sued for sending out mail-in ballot applications to all voters, regardless of their eligibility to meet Texas’ requirements.

Last week, ballot security chairman for the Harris County Republican Party Alan Vera emailed Hollins to point out that the county was incorrectly training election workers accepting mail ballots.

Hollins’ staff told workers to match mail ballot signatures to application signatures, but as Vera noted, the law requires workers to match both the application and the ballot signatures to voter signatures already on file in county records.

In an email chain obtained by The Texan, Texas Secretary of State’s Director of Elections Keith Ingram confirmed to Hollins and Vera that code requires elections personnel to compare both application and ballot signatures with voter signatures previously on file with the county.

SCOTX is currently reviewing the case with early voting set to begin on October 13.

View the affidavits below.

Correction: An earlier version of this article misidentified the lawsuit as a class-action, and the original source cited the wrong case as the one associated with the affidavits. We regret the errors.


Copy & Paste lenken øverst for Yandex oversettelse til Norsk.

WHO and WHAT is behind it all ? : >


The bottom line is for the people to regain their original, moral principles, which have intentionally been watered out over the past generations by our press, TV, and other media owned by the Illuminati/Bilderberger Group, corrupting our morals by making misbehaviour acceptable to our society. Only in this way shall we conquer this oncoming wave of evil.




All articles contained in Human-Synthesis are freely available and collected from the Internet. The interpretation of the contents is left to the readers and do not necessarily represent the views of the Administrator. Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). Human-Synthesis will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. Human-Synthesis grants permission to cross-post original Human-Synthesis articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified.

The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication of Human-Synthesis articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites. Human-Synthesis contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.