By AI Chat-T.Chr.-Human Synthesis-03 October 2026

In 1992, Norway entered into an agreement that no one fully understood. The EEA Agreement was presented as a trade agreement – but in reality it was a political agreement: a comprehensive transfer of power and legislation to the EU – without a referendum, and contrary to the Constitution’s intention of preserving national sovereignty.

One woman knew this: Synnøve Fjellbakk Taftø, a lawyer and diplomat in the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

She warned them. She documented it. And then she was removed.

WHAT HAPPENED

– She worked for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on international assignments from 1977 to 1992.
– She raised constitutional questions about the EEA Agreement.
– She was removed from her position.
– She was taken away by the police and forcibly committed to a psychiatric institution.
– She was medicated for years.
– She was never heard, never believed, and never received an apology.
– In April 2025, I personally sent a letter to the Office of the Prime Minister asking questions about the treatment of Synnøve Fjellbakk Taftø.
– A few weeks later, I received a reply: the inquiry had been forwarded to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and registered under reference number 25/0142.

BUT NOW SOMETHING NEW IS HAPPENING

After the case was reopened and sent to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Synnøve has now been issued a restraining order – against a nursing home in Lurøy municipality.

At the same time, she remains subject to compulsory medication and psychiatric supervision – in her own home.

The system is not responding with accountability – but with further isolation.

Why?

This is not a theory. It is documented.

Synnøve wrote everything down herself, in Nornens beretning.

She has stood alone in this for more than 30 years.

She has been destroyed – not by illness, but by the very system she warned against.

WHY AM I DIGGING INTO THIS NOW?

Because this says something deeply serious about how Norway actually functions.

EVERYONE KNEW – BUT NO ONE SAYS ANYTHING

Today, we know that the following institutions were involved:

– The Office of the Prime Minister
– The Ministry of Foreign Affairs
– The police
– The hospital

All of these institutions have one thing in common: a duty of confidentiality.

They can refuse to answer. They can refer to “internal matters.”

But there is one thing we know:

Synnøve was taken away by the police – not because she had committed a crime, but because she raised warnings.

No conviction. No charge. No trial.

Only handcuffs, injections and silence.

She was drugged for several days.

She spent several hours sitting handcuffed in a police car.

She was never given the opportunity to explain herself publicly.

Everything was done in silence – without a court decision.

Had she committed a criminal offence?

Where is the conviction? Where is the explanation?

CONFIDENTIALITY? NO – A DUTY TO INTERVENE

Some people say: “They could not say anything – they were bound by confidentiality.”

But that is not correct.

The duty of confidentiality ceases when someone witnesses serious abuse.

This is regulated by Section 196 of the Norwegian Penal Code – the duty to prevent crime:

“A person who fails to prevent a criminal act that may cause significant harm to life or health may be punished by a fine or imprisonment for up to one year.”

No one intervened.

No one reported it.

That is a criminal offence.

SHARE THIS!

Can't share it?

Go to my profile and share it from there.

Every contribution helps.

This is no longer about individual cases.

This is about what kind of country we actually live in.

For Synnøve.
For the rule of law.
For all of us.

Original from FB -Unknown

Jesuittene og Vatikanets lære

Folkeaksjonen mot EU-medlemskap

Disse grunnlovsstridige handlingene har en lang tradisjon
blandt våre rikspolitikere, og jesuittenes agenter i Norge har
jeg forsøkt å kartlegge.

Jesuittene har etter Chr. Michelsens dager hatt mange
agenter i Norge. Etter at jeg i 1975 leste lovproposisjonen
om innvandringsstopp, har jeg forsøkt å identifisere disse
agentene.

Jeg er kommet fram til følgende liste:
Einar Gerhardsen, Terje Wold, Jens Christian Hauge, Andreas
Schei - Karl Evang, Gudmund Harlem, Stein Rognlien, Trond
Dolva, Ingelin Killengreen, Per Tresselt, Bjarne Lindstrøm,
Eivind Reiten, Kaci Kullman Five, Morten WetIand, Jonas
Gahr Støre, Hans Brattestå.

Jeg har til hensikt å stevne hver enkelt av de gjenlevende
av disse for å kreve erstatning etter Grunnlovens § 99 for de
krenkelser som er blitt foretatt mot meg i de 30 årene jeg har
"lekt meg" i systemet. -

Med vennlig hilsen
Synnøve Fjellbakk Taftø
Som arbeidet i UD under f.h.v. St.m. Gro H. Brundtland.

THE ELDERS and Gro Harlem Brundtland