FOR TRUMP THERE IS NO OTHER WAY.

By Human Synthesis-06 March 2026

The repulsive war started by the US and Israel against Iraq escalated as indirect negotiations between the US and Iran were interrupted in Oman. The United States (Trump) was "not happy" with the talks and demanded that Iran completely cease all urainium enrichment.

Now after 5 days, this war has brought dramatic economic consequences. This might cause Trump to leave this, but the question is when. How far is he willing to go?" Defending liberty does not mean uncritically supporting every new war. ”One can condemn Iran's brutal regime and at the same time question the wisdom of yet another war in the Middle East.The Iranian regime has long suppressed its own population and supported violent groups in the region and carried out its own operations. That is a fact.

But that is why the world should be especially careful with decisions that risk throwing the entire region into an even bigger war. History should humble us. The United States has repeatedly tried to change countries through military intervention with promises of stability and democracy. The result has often been something completely different.

Afghanistan was invaded after the terrorist attacks in 2001. After twenty years of war, the Taliban regained power almost immediately when the United States left the country.

Iraq was invaded in 2003 under the pretext that the country had weapons of mass destruction - weapons that later turned out to not exist. The invasion threw the country into years of violence and instability.

In Libya, NATO's intervention in 2011 contributed to the overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi, but afterwards the country was left divided and without a functioning state. There are more and un-researched.

I think of Vietnam where I myself know several close friends who have been with and even today have problems even though those I know are well-established. The United States war in Vietnam waged primarily to stop the spread of communism in Southeast Asia, driven by domino theory during the Cold War that ended humiliating for the United States.

The pattern is difficult to ignore. Regimes can be destroyed with military power - but stable societies and functioning democracies are rarely built that way. Therefore, it is reasonable to ask some simple questions even now. What is the goal really? A regime change in Iran? A weakened Iran? Or do we risk another conflict whose consequences no one can fully control once it has started? What also worries me is how big geopolitical decisions sometimes coincide with domestic political tensions and election movements.

That is why decisions about war should always be characterized by the greatest possible reflection and responsibility. In addition, I am concerned about Donald Trump's geopolitical policies and greediness that could cause the other two superpowers to legitimately act likewise. One thing that is certain, Donald Trump has no idea what he has allowed the United States to get into! I am writing this not to defend any dictatorship, but as a freedom loving person who believes in human dignity and responsibility for history.

War can sometimes be inevitable. But history shows time and time again how easy they are to start - and how difficult it is to predict their real consequences. At a time when the world is already shaken by conflicts, economic unrest and growing distrust between nations, every new war should be met with the simplest and most important of issues: Is there really no better way?

Source: Anonymous FB - 06 March 2026