4 min read

Rich countries have lost enthusiasm for tackling climate crisis, says Cop30 chief

Rich countries have lost enthusiasm for tackling climate crisis, says Cop30 chief

By Guardian - Harvey in Belém-Mon 10 Nov 2025 05.00 GMT

Rich countries have lost enthusiasm for combating the climate crisis while China is surging ahead in producing and using clean energy equipment, the president of the UN climate talks has said. Brazil’s André Corrêa do Lago says countries should follow China’s lead on clean energy as conference begins.

More countries should follow China’s lead instead of complaining about being outcompeted, said André Corrêa do Lago, the Brazilian diplomat in charge of the Cop30 conference, which begins on Monday.

“Somehow the reduction in enthusiasm of the global north is showing that the global south is moving,” Corrêa do Lago told reporters in Belém, the city in the Amazonian rainforest where the fortnight-long Cop30 conference is taking place. “It is not just this year, it has been moving for years, but it did not have the exposure that it has now.”

He pointed to the world’s biggest emitter of greenhouse gases, China, which is also the biggest producer and consumer of low-carbon energy. “China is coming up with solutions that are for everyone, not just China,” he said. “Solar panels are cheaper, they’re so competitive [compared with fossil fuel energy] that they are everywhere now. If you’re thinking of climate change, this is good.”

Ministers and high-ranking officials from 194 countries will seek to forge plans at Cop30 to stay within, or as close as possible to, the limit of 1.5C of heating set out in the Paris agreement, to set a roadmap to phase out fossil fuels, and to ensure that poor countries receive the help they need.

Top of the agenda will be national plans on cutting greenhouse gas emissions, which currently would lead to a devastating 2.5C of heating. Vulnerable countries want to draw up a plan that will show how countries can outdo their current inadequate efforts and meet the Paris agreement targets.

Ilana Seid, Palau’s ambassador to the UN and a spokesperson for the Alliance of Small Island States (Aosis), said setting out a global pathway to deeper emissions cuts would be key. “Progress so far has been insufficient and we have to have a response,” she told the Guardian. “Otherwise, we don’t know where we are going.”

The Brazilian hosts are focused on “implementation” – that is, putting into practice commitments that have already been made, such as cuts to greenhouse gas emissions, a tripling of renewable energy by 2030 and a doubling of energy efficiency. But Aosis wants more than this, arguing that without policies to cut emissions faster, the target of limiting heating to 1.5C will be lost.

“The 1.5C target must be our north star,” Seid said. “We need to say that collectively we are falling short on that, and we need to have a response.”

Poor countries also want assurances that they will receive promised funds to protect them against the impacts of climate breakdown. A roadmap to move the world off fossil fuels will also be under discussion.

But, despite efforts by Brazil over more than six months to avoid a fight at the conference opening over what should be on the agenda, bitter disagreements over what the conference should focus on and what should be off the table are still likely on Monday.

As the conference begins, the Guardian can reveal that one key climate pledge is already being undermined. At Cop26 in Glasgow in 2021, the UK, the US, the EU and other countries forged the global methane pledge, requiring a cut in methane of 30% by 2030. About 159 countries subsequently signed up.

Yet emissions from some of the main signatories have increased, data from the satellite analysis company Kayrros shows, which is likely to further raise global temperatures. Collectively, emissions from six of the biggest signatories – the US, Australia, Kuwait, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Iraq – are now 8.5% above the 2020 level.


Editor Notes

Climate Stability, Chaos Theory, and Human Intervention

Before drawing conclusions regarding recent climatic anomalies, it is essential to consider the established scientific understanding of natural atmospheric behavior through the lens of Chaos Theory. Earth’s weather systems are the product of a highly complex and interdependent network of variables — including global wind circulation, ocean currents, and the interaction between atmospheric and oceanic temperatures. Over geological timescales, these elements have maintained a form of dynamic equilibrium, smoothing out extremes and sustaining conditions conducive to life.

According to Chaos Theory, even small perturbations in one part of this system can trigger disproportionate and far-reaching consequences elsewhere — a phenomenon popularly referred to as the Butterfly Effect. Thus, any localized human intervention in natural climatic processes can produce unintended and potentially severe outcomes across distant regions of the planet.

A prime example of the atmosphere–ocean coupling mechanism can be observed in the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) cycle, which alternates between El Niño and La Niña phases. These oscillations, typically lasting 9 to 12 months but without a fixed periodicity, are driven primarily by variations in Pacific Ocean surface temperatures and trade wind patterns.

  • El Niño is characterized by a warming of equatorial Pacific waters, weakening of the trade winds, and consequent global shifts in rainfall and temperature distributions.
  • La Niña, conversely, involves a cooling of ocean surface waters, strengthening of trade winds, and opposing meteorological effects.

The increasingly frequent and severe weather anomalies observed today can be interpreted as manifestations of disruptions induced by extensive human interference — such as deforestation, geoengineering, emissions, and other anthropogenic modifications of atmospheric and oceanic processes.

It is crucial to recognize, however, that an abrupt cessation of such interventions could also introduce destabilizing shifts, as the system attempts to recalibrate to its natural equilibrium. Therefore, a gradual, globally coordinated reduction in human interference is advisable. Such a measured approach would allow Earth’s coupled systems of wind, water, and temperature to progressively reestablish their intrinsic balance and potentially restore a more predictable climatic regime over time.

THE CHAOS THEORY ON MOTHER EARTH
By AI ChatGPT3-T.Chr.-Human Synthesis-04 August 2023