Epstein's VIP Blackmail Ring
By Radical Dispatch-Substack - Maajid Nawaz - 22 October 2025
At the top of this post, Resistance Radio presents our WARRIOR CREED video/audio podcast from Tuesday 21st October 2025, with a transcript provided - Epstein’s VIP Blackmail Ring:
Prince Andrew - Lord Mandelson - PM Blair - PM Starmer - Grooming Gangs - PM Barak - Middle East War. Follow The Evidence.
The reader may buy Virginia Giuffre’s memoir Nobody’s Girl from here.
Epstein’s VIP Blackmail Ring:
Prince Andrew - Lord Mandelson - PM Blair - PM Starmer - Grooming Gangs - PM Barak - Middle East War. Follow The Evidence.
- A Radical Dispatch
1) Prince Andrew
The Epstein saga just isn’t letting up for Prince Andrew.
The Times reports 19th October 2025:
“More documents related to Prince Andrew’s friendship with Jeffrey Epstein are expected to be released in the US after Democrats in Congress vowed to ‘deliver justice’ for the victims of the paedophile financier. The House of Representatives oversight committee has released tens of thousands of documents, including travel logs, pictures and messages, from Epstein’s estate over the past several weeks. The documents were obtained through a subpoena. Previous releases included evidence suggesting Andrew received massages paid for with $200 cheques and travelled in Epstein’s private jet, nicknamed the ‘Lolita Express’. On Friday, the committee issued another trove of documents, which included Epstein’s calendar showing lunches and dinners with Woody Allen, Peter Thiel, the PayPal co-founder and Mark Zuckerberg. One phone log showed two undated calls with President Trump. Andrew appeared as a passenger on four different flights.”
Fearing more is soon to be revealed, his brother King Charles has stripped Andrew of all his remaining titles except ‘Prince’, which would require a change in law.
The impetus has been provided not only by the US Congressional oversight committee’s decision to continue releasing documents related to this saga, but also to the fact that Prince Andrew accuser Virginia Giuffre has posthumously released a memoir detailing horrific accounts of her abuse.
The Times reports 20th October 2025:
“The story of Giuffre has been told and retold in the pages of newspapers and in the dockets filed in civil lawsuits, but the book offers the first full account of her life in her own words. Giuffre warns early on that it will be a difficult read. ‘I know this is a lot to take in. The violence. The bad decisions. The self harm,’ she writes. ‘But please, don’t stop reading’.”
Demands for further disclosure have been met with temporary respite, as House Speaker Mike Johnson (R) will not allow the final voter for disclosure to take her Congressional seat until the Federal shutdown ends.
The Times reports 19th October 2025:
The Times reports 19th October 2025:
“Democrats are trying to force the release of the wider Epstein files. They need 218 signatures to secure a vote in the House of Representatives. But, the party remains stuck on 217 signatures because Mike Johnson, the Republican speaker of the House, is blocking a newly elected congresswoman from taking her seat. Adelita Grijalva was elected last month, succeeding her father, Raúl Grijalva, who died earlier this year. She has vowed to provide the 218th signature once she is allowed to take her seat. However, Johnson claimed he cannot allow Grijalva to take her seat during the government shutdown. ‘We will swear her in when everybody gets back,’ he said…Thomas Massie, a Republican congressman who teamed up with Democrats to try to force the release of the Epstein files, said Johnson was ‘delaying the vote’. ‘First the British ambassador lost his job and now the prince lost his title. Don’t tell us there’s nothing in the Epstein files. The truth is coming out and we will not give up,’ he wrote on Facebook.”
King Charles is seeking to rapidly get ahead of this development. This Radical Dispatch follows the available evidence, the trail of which continues to go all the way up to multiple members of the King’s Privy Council (his cabinet). This does not bode well for the King.
Regardless, the shutdown will eventually end. And these floodgates will open.
2) Lord ‘Petie’ Mandelson
Radical Media had long been warning that this story would snowball, even as UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer inexplicably appointed Epstein’s known close friend Lord Peter Mandelson as his ambassador to the US.
Radical Media reports 12th February 2025:
It was inevitable that this move would spectacularly backfire, as it eventually did just last month.
Radical Media reports 12th September 2025
The Times reports 11th September 2025:
The Times reports 11th September 2025:
“Depth of Mandelson-Epstein relationship was new information, No 10 says. Starmer found Mandelson’s emails to Epstein ‘reprehensible’, Downing Street has said. Asked if the prime minister shared the view of two ministers who said they were disgusted and sickened by the messages, Starmer’s spokesman said: ‘I think it’s self-evident that he found the content of these emails reprehensible.’ Asked what aspect Starmer found reprehensible, he said the depth and extent of the relationship shown in the emails was ‘new information’. ‘And they show that Peter Mandelson suggested that Jeffrey Epstein’s first conviction was wrongful, should be challenged — that is why he’s been withdrawn as ambassador with immediate effect.’”
But Starmer’s decision to go ahead and appoint Mandelson raises more questions than it answers.
Click to play:
Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED “The grooming gang story isn’t a new story. The Epstein story is not a new story. What’s new here is the cover up and who was involved in the cover up and how many presidents, princes and prime ministers were involved in the cover up on behalf of Epstein - who was running a global VIP blackmail ring for pedophiles in order to acquire compromise on them so that he could blackmail them to do his bidding.
And the bidding that he wanted them to do was to push forward with a globalist agenda, which included technocracy and permawar and the COVID mandates. This is how they got the politicians and the leaders to do what they wanted them to do. That’s the cover-up. So the actual real story now should be about the cover-up. And people should be very much concerned as to exactly why Keir Starmer, despite knowing what he knew about Epstein and his relationship with Mandelson, continued nevertheless to still appoint Mandelson as our ambassador to Washington DC.”
As Radical Media previously revealed in much detail, Lord Mandelson never stopped contacting or visiting Epstein long after Epstein’s first ‘sweetheart’ conviction in Florida.
Radical Media reports 11th January 2024:
All of this raises the question, who was responsible for vetting Lord Mandelson as he was appointed by PM Starmer to his latest diplomatic role in DC?
The Times reports 11th September 2025:
“Ministers insist Mandelson was vetted ‘robustly.’ The government has insisted that Lord Mandelson was subject to ‘robust security clearances and processes’ before his appointment. Stephen Doughty, the Foreign Office minister, said Epstein was a ‘despicable criminal who committed the most heinous crimes and destroyed the lives of so many women’.”
In fact, it has since been revealed that Mandelson himself admitted his friendship with Epstein during his vetting process.
The Times reports 11th September 2025:
“Lord Mandelson admitted in his vetting interview for US ambassador that he continued his relationship with the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein for many years, allies said last night, as Sir Keir Starmer faced questions from cabinet ministers about his political judgment.”
We here at Radical Media have been canceled from corporate media for far far less in our public challenge of Covid mandates.
3) PM Starmer, Jimmy Saville & Grooming Gangs
What do they have on PM Keir Starmer such that he remained loyal to Lord Mandelson right up until the day before his departure from post in Washington DC, even as Mandelson had admitted his Epstein friendship in his vetting interview?
The Times reports 10th September 2025:
“On Tuesday, Downing Street defended Mandelson and said that Starmer still had confidence in his ambassador…”
For two years prior, and despite being asked multiple times by journalists, Starmer had refused to abandon Mandelson. Why?
The Telegraph reports 21st June 2023:
“Sir Keir Starmer will continue receiving advice from Lord Mandelson, despite accusations he maintained a friendship with Jeffrey Epstein..”
This is the same Keir Starmer who as head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) failed to prosecute known serial pedophile, the late Jimmy Saville.
The Sun reports 16th June 2020:
When Prime Minister, and among his many mistakes, Boris Johnson himself challenged Starmer on his earlier role as Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) for choosing not to prosecute Britains most notorious pedophile and personal friend of King Charles, Sir Jimmy Saville.
Click to play:
PM Boris Johnson to Keir Starmer: “This Leader of the Opposition, a former Director of Public Prosecutions Mr Speaker, if anything, he spent most of his time prosecuting journalists and failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile, as far as I can make out, Mr Speaker. He, Mr Speaker, chose to use this moment, he used this moment, Mr Speaker, continually to prejudge a police inquiry. That’s what he chose to do. He’s reached his conclusions about it. I’m not going to reach any conclusions and he would be entirely wrong to do so...”
So what exactly do serial abusers have on Starmer, such that he consistently votes to protect them? Does any of this feel right to you?
Again, this is the same Keir Starmer that whipped every single one of his MPs to vote against the UK underage rape ‘grooming’ gangs inquiry.
Upon PM Starmer’s instructions, all Labour MPs initially voted against this inquiry unanimously.
Radical Media reports 8th January 2025:
The underage rape slave ‘grooming gang’ scandal is the latest in a long line of sex abuse stories and dates back some years in the UK. The issue itself is not so much news anymore, but the cover up by Prime Minister Keir Starmer is.
The Times of London has been at the forefront of seeking to expose these revelations.
The Times reports 6th January 2025:
The Times reports 6th January 2025:
“The prime minister was in charge of the Crown Prosecution Service when The Times exposed a conspiracy of silence around on-street grooming among police, councils and prosecutors in 2011. The Labour leader has used his time as director of public prosecutions to his political advantage several times.”
Here is a summary of the basic story from this author’s days on Global’s LBC radio:
Click to play:
Maajid Nawaz on Global’s LBC:
“In 27 cities with probably thousands of underage young girls, it must lead to a Stephen Lawrence style national inquiry looking into what the institutional failures have been, well here the majority of these girls were in care homes and therefore were let down by these care homes. One girl was she was impregnated twice before the age of 15 in her care home because an adult predator was allowed into their care home to statutorily rape her eventually found dead from a heroin overdose. There has been failures on an institutional level in the care homes up and down this country. There have been failures on an institutional level in the police up and down this country, and there have been failures on an institutional level in local Labor councils, probably not only Labor but mainly Labor councils up and down this country, because people have been scared of being called racist. And the fear of racism or the fear of so-called “Islamophobia” which is a misnomer, the fear more appropriately of anti-muslim bigotry, must never be an excuse to allow underage girls to be raped and abused in this way. Think of that, imagine that. 27 cities and counting because I can guarantee you we haven’t heard the end of this yet. Imagine the thousands of victims. Imagine the impunity with which these men must have been acting. Some of the girls as young as 11. One girl, if my memory serves me correctly, was in oxford one girl was even branded branded by her raper as property of, and then his name, on her leg. And I think if memory serves me correctly, that girl was 11 years old. It is an absolute disgrace. People have cared for their reputations over the safety of children in this country being raped and drugged and passed around like meat because of the bigotry and the prejudices of these Pakistani Muslim men who were looking down on these children as less than, as inferior, as some form of infidel that doesn’t deserve honour or dignity. And I address you now here, oh, woke left wing. You talk about believing the victim. Look it up. Go to your smartphone and Google Ella Hill. She writes a piece in The Independent in which she describes the religious extremist terminology her abusers were using as they were sexually exploiting her as a child, in which she talks of how they called her an infidel and how they abused her race and her lack of Islamic faith and justified treating her in this way because they viewed her as less than because they believed themselves to be Muslim supremacists. Don’t tell me that their Muslim identity had nothing to do with this. I have lived and breathed this community all of my life. I can guarantee you that it’s not the cause, but a factor in the way in which these girls was treated was the culture of these men. And as part of that culture is their religious attitude towards non-Muslims. And that is the reason that you see almost exclusively that they are men like me, Pakistani, British, Muslim. Most of them, all of them Muslims, almost all Pakistani Muslims. And the victims, almost all underaged white girls. We started to convict people. Yes, I listed those 27 cities for you. which is bad enough as it is. But where’s the accountability for the police who covered this up? Where’s the accountability for the Labour councils who covered this up? Where are the accolades for Anne Cryer MP, former Labour MP in Keeley, who raised this years and years ago? Was a sole voice, crying out into the wilderness, beseeching people to listen to her. Then came Julie Bindell, the first to write columns about this. Ignored, in fact, she writes herself that in 2007 she was looking into this and her pieces were shelved. Look how Sarah Champion was treated, Labour frontbencher who was sacked because she said this was a problem. And now finally, the independent police watchdog has said, yes, it was covered up by the police. Well, that’s not good enough because nothing short of this national and statutory inquiry will satisfy the victims and bring them dignity and honour, but also quell the anger that people are rightfully feeling as these cases unfold. As I say, it is a national disgrace.”
Keir Starmer’s role as DPP has also been raised by one of the most prominent whistleblowers of this underage rape ‘grooming’ gang scandal, former police detective Maggie Oliver.
Click to play:
Whistleblower Maggie Oliver: “I shouldn’t have had to resign. It’s still, you know, 12 years on from that day, and we are still going round this same hamster wheel.”
Correspondent: “We need to see Keir Starmer stand up in the House of Commons and issue you a full and unreserved apology, don’t we?”
Maggie Oliver: “You know what Bev? Empty words mean nothing to me. I want to see him put his actions where his mouth is you know blaming this problem on far-right extremists is actually dodging the issue. He was the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) when I resigned from Rochdale, and I resigned because the charges that were being levelled at the predators and the abusers of those men, I knew in detail. I knew what had happened to them because I’ve spoken to them all. You know, being threatened at gunpoint, being passed around a room like a bull, being raped on a daily basis. And he…made the decision alongside the prosecutors that the man who got a 13-year-old pregnant didn’t face charges of rape. He was out of prison in less than four years. As a tactical option, they put a child victim of that gang on the indictment so they could get her evidence into court without even telling her. Then they tried to take her children away from her. He was the DPP. And I’m sorry, when he says that his record is clear and good, I would take him straight back to that case, which 10 years later, Bev, the Chief Constable of Manchester has publicly acknowledged, it was borderline incompetence in the handling of it on many levels. And to this day, the CPS refused to apologise for putting that victim on the indictment as a purely tactical option. So we still have a long, long way to go. And so, you know, words like yesterday, they...can again actually are blaming victims and abuse and abuse victims for standing up for their right to have their their their abusers tackled and dealt with properly it’s..smoke and mirrors and I’ve heard these things so many times that I get really angry about it.”
Indeed, it is the cover up that has angered so many, and will continue to do so.
Click to play:
Maajid Nawaz on WARRIOR CREED: “Now, we mentioned the cover-up, which is why people are so upset. Understand why people are so upset. This is a systemic cover-up. We have institutional failures in our police, in our Labour government and in our local Labour council and in our child protection services. All of which have been complicit in covering this up and for which multiple reports have also come to this same conclusion that they’ve been covering it up. And whistleblower former police detective Maggie Oliver in particular has been speaking about Keir Starmer as director of public prosecutions, covering this up when he made the decision alongside other prosecutors that a man who got a 13-year-old pregnant should not face charges of rape.”
4) Prosecutor Nazir Afzal & the Cover Up
There really is little by way of an excuse for the abysmal failure to act. The Times even ran a front cover on the issue back in 2010.
Original Times cover story:
Activists such as Ann Cryer MP had been raising the alarm since 2003 and, much like the victims themselves, was branded a trouble maker for her efforts.
The Times reports 6th January 2025:
As for PM Starmer, the precise role that he played in making sure that relevant cases were buried has been further detailed by the Times.
The Times reports 6th January 2025:
“It was against this background that Starmer, the former human rights barrister, was selected as the surprise choice to be the director of public prosecutions (DPP). His appointment was announced in July 2008, and he took up the position in November of that year. Shortly after he took up the role, a critical child grooming case in Rochdale was dropped before trial by a CPS lawyer in July 2009. They had concluded the victim would not come across as credible, even though one of her attacker’s DNA was found on her underwear.”
The failures went beyond Starmer though, and touch on multiple institutions that are supposed to be safeguarding children but appeared instead to have been complicit in their systemic rape.
The Times reports 6th January 2025:
“There were other signs that the CPS, councils and police forces were failing victims. One serious case review, published in 2010, found ‘missed opportunities’ to help two grooming and abuse victims between 2008 and 2009. The girls, who lived in care in Derby, were instead treated as rebellious teenagers, the report found. Police became involved by chance, at a car stop, and 13 men were convicted for what investigators described as ‘a campaign of rape against children’. Other trials also hinted at the problem. Nine men were convicted in August 2010 for forcing a 14-year-old into prostitution and using her ‘as a commodity’ in Greater Manchester. The scandal lay in the cases that were not brought to trial. Starmer’s team claims these cases never reached the DPP’s office.”
Instead, what Starmer appears to have done is to appoint his lackey Nazir Afzal in order to prosecute contain the street-level cases while absolving the institutions and the people running them of their criminal failures.
The Times reports 6th January 2025:
Times reporter Andrew “Norfolk’s reports were read by Nazir Afzal, then the CPS’s national director of communities who says he immediately told Starmer this was an area that demanded more focus. Shortly afterwards, in May 2011, he moved to take up the job as chief prosecutor in the northwest. ‘They brought the Rochdale case to me, I revisited and decided it should be prosecuted. I told Keir and he said fine...‘We brought in first ever national guidelines on prosecuting child sexual abuse,’ Afzal said. ‘I led on them, but [Starmer] was with me on that journey…Every police force had their own guidance, so we persuaded the police to have one national police guideline on tackling these types of cases. Keir had conversation with the home secretary, and in 2013 [child sexual abuse] became a national policing priority. ‘He allowed me to lead a national team of specialist prosecutors, which never existed before, and commissioned to set up the first ever child sexual abuse review panel, which he jointly chaired.”
Here is prosecutor Nazir Afzal confirming the order of events.
And here is that same lackey Nazir Afzal reposting Tony Blair’s former Political Secretary who praises Afzal and PM Starmer, despite the cover up that has been, and is being revealed:
The truth is slightly less flattering for Nazir Afzal’s boss, Sir Keir Starmer.
It is because of this very cover up that a national statutory inquiry is needed, precisely as we demanded over four years ago on LBC. And it is because there was a cover up that Starmer’s Labour party are still doing everything within their power to obstruct such an inquiry.
Maajid Nawaz on GB News with Neil Oliver, 6th February 2025, Click to play:
Full interview with Neil Oliver on GB News can be found on youtube as Part 1 and Part 2.
“Pakistani street gangs are only one element and that’s why we immediately said this was a cover-up don’t just talk about the street level gangs they are organised gangs who have their connections in the police, the social services, the local councils, all the way up through the national political hierarchy of the Labour party. Now, since we said that, it all came out. We were pointing at the time to Lord Ahmed’s conviction for underage sex abuse, who was a Labour peer from Rotherham, which was a trigger case for these grooming gangs. Now that’s from right at the top. We were also pointing to Keir Starmer’s decision to appoint Peter Mandelson, as his ambassador to the US, Mandelson the same guy, without a doubt, on record in released court documents is proven to have visited Epstein’s island, to have gone to Epstein’s mansion in New York and to have gone to Paris for his birthday. Close friend of Epstein, more so than even Prince Andrew. Right? There’s more information on Mandelson’s relationship with him than there even was with Prince Andrew. So why was Starmer, look at how Prince Andrew was treated, why was Starmer rewarding Mandelson with the most diplomatic appointment on the planet for Britain, which is to America, right? Granting him diplomatic immunity is what it was about. So that’s how far up the rot goes, right to the top with Lord Ahmed and Peter Mandelson. By the way, both Labour and both from the Blair era, Mandelson was Blair’s ‘dark prince’ who had all the dirt on all of the politicians and that’s how he kept them in line, it’s why he was called the ‘dark prince’. Where do you think he got that dirt from if not Epstein, right? So that’s what was going on. Since we said all of that what got revealed? Well there was a Labour former Defence Minister who got arrested in a sting for attempting to solicit sexual favours from an underage boy, and then two police officers got arrested in Rotherham for being involved as well. This all came out after the scandal was recently resurrected by Musk. Proving that this is bigger, as you just said, Neil, than the mere street gang level. And it’s not just Pakistanis. This thing is a rot that goes through the system, and is actually what people used to refer to as ‘conspiracy theory’. It’s the global VIP pedophile ring that used to be run by Epstein, which is an acknowledged Mossad operation.”
After the Harvey Weinstein Hollywood story, revelations around the Mossad-backed Epstein global VIP pedophile ring, the P. Diddy music industry sex abuse cases, and after revelations around the Church of England mass child abuse leading to the recent resignation of the Archbishop, among multiple other such scandals, is there any doubt remaining as to our warning from 2023 below?
5) Blackmail for War
In answer to why such a vast and complex blackmail operation would be needed, one need look no further than to current events. War is hugely profitable. It also provides the ideal pretext to introduce further totalitarian technocratic control, such as digital ID cards.
Radical Media reports 3rd April 2024:
The reality is that - as the Epstein case demonstrates - powerful positions and institutions in our society have been infiltrated by people who have been severely compromised through blackmail. As such, they proceed to run these positions and institutions not in the interests of their own nation, but at the behest of the blackmailing party. This is why Western policy has seemed for years to be working against its own people.
There is no polite way to say this. Epstein’s entire global VIP pedophile ring, being exposed in real time, and connected to royalty as it is, has been one large Mossad blackmail operation in order to entrap royalty and those who serve them into pursuing the foreign policy aims of Israel.
The Daily Mail reports 4th January 2024:
“The Jeffrey Epstein list of associates unsealed by a US judge has reignited suspicions the pedophile financier was an asset for Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency. Israel’s former prime minister Ehud Barak was identified in the bombshell dossiers Wednesday night. He served as PM from 1991 to 2001 after serving in the IDF for 35 years, rising to Chief of the General Staff.”
Imagine the security clearances needed to be able to privately meet the Prime Minister of Israel no less than 36 times. It is no longer in much doubt that Epstein’s entire operation was a Mossad honeytrap designed to capture compromising material on senior figures and leverage this Kompromat so as to pursue Israel’s foreign policy aims.
The Daily Mail reports 5th December 2019:
As to the purpose of this blackmail, the Radical Dispatch reports 11th January 2024:
Is it any wonder then that even former PM Tony Blair, who launched Britain’s ill-fated invasion of Iraq, was made to meet with Epstein in Downing Street, at none other than Lord Mandelson’s request.
BBC reports 10th October 2025:
“Sir Tony Blair met with Jeffrey Epstein in Downing Street while still prime minister, following lobbying by Lord Peter Mandelson, the BBC has confirmed….Emails seen by BBC News show Lord Mandelson pushed for the meeting, telling Sir Tony’s chief of staff Jonathan Powell that Epstein was “a friend of mine” who ex-US President Bill Clinton hoped to introduce to the PM.”
Likewise, after Starmer initially blocked the UK inquiry into underage rape ‘grooming’ gangs, yet another Labour minister who supported war was exposed for similar behaviour.
Radical Media reports 15th January 2025:
The Sun reports 11th January 2025:
“FORMER Labour minister Ivor Caplin was arrested today after he was filmed allegedly trying to meet with a 15-year-old child he met online. The ex-Hove MP was stopped at his local train station by activist group Stop Stings who told The Sun they had arranged to meet him there posing as an ‘underage boy’.”
Caplin’s career is stated online as follows:
“Caplin became an Assistant Government Whip. He was a prominent supporter of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, and refused to accept a 1,000 signature petition from constituents against the invasion, resulting in regular demonstrations outside his constituency office. In June 2003 he was appointed Parliamentary under-secretary of state and Minister for Veterans at the Ministry of Defence. During his term, he introduced the Veteran’s Badge for those who had served in HM Armed Forces. He was vice chairman of Labour Friends of Israel from 1997 to 2005….He was the Chair of the Jewish Labour Movement for 2018–19.”
The arrest of such a senior former Labour minister came soon after Labour unanimously voted down an inquiry into underage rape ‘grooming’ gangs in Parliament.
Sky News reports 8th January 2025:
“A Tory bid to launch a new national inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal has been voted down by MPs amid criticism of ‘political game playing’. MPs rejected the amendment to the Children’s Wellbeing Bill by 364 to 111, a majority of 253.”
It is probably this incident with Ivor Caplin that forced Starmer’s hand to eventually allow the public inquiry into underage rape ‘grooming’ gangs, which Labour is still obstructing.
The Times reports 21st October 2025:
“One of two candidates shortlisted to run Britain’s grooming gang inquiry has pulled out of the process after two survivors of child sexual abuse resigned over a ‘toxic, fearful environment’. The withdrawal of Annie Hudson, a social worker, leaves only Jim Gamble, a former head of the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (Ceop), in the running to lead the inquiry. Jess Phillips, the home office minister, had said on Monday in a letter to the home affairs select Committee that ministers would press on with the appointment process, despite the concerns of abuse victims Fiona Goddard and Ellie Reynolds. In a letter resigning from the victims liaison panel advising the Home Office about the inquiry, Goddard said the process so far had involved ‘secretive conduct’ and instances of ‘condescending and controlling language’ towards survivors.”
6) Floodgates Will Open
But these floodgates will open. Supporting the angle that Epstein was a Mossad asset, Virginia Giuffre’s posthumous memoir contains harrowing details involving former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak.
The following revelations are graphic and may trigger survivors of sexual or other violent trauma.
Mint Press News reports 20th October 2025:
The New York Post reports 18th October 2025:
“Giuffre simply referred to the deranged man as the ‘Prime Minister,’ saying she was afraid the brute would ‘seek to hurt’ her if she printed his name. In the past, however, she pointed to Israel’s Prime Minister Ehud Barak in court filings as one of the many elites who had raped her, a claim he has repeatedly denied…In her memoir, Giuffre said she first met the ‘Prime Minister’ on Epstein’s private island in the US Virgin Islands sometime in 2002, when she was just 18. She was ordered to escort him to a cabana, but the man made it clear as soon as they were alone that ‘he wanted violence.’ ‘He repeatedly choked me until I lost consciousness and took pleasure in seeing me in fear for my life. Horrifically, the Prime Minister laughed when he hurt me and got more aroused when I begged him to stop. I emerged from the cabana bleeding from my mouth, vagina, and anus. For days, it hurt to breathe and to swallow,’ Giuffre wrote. The politician ‘raped me more savagely than anyone had before.’ She immediately rushed to Epstein and begged him not to send her back to the Prime Minister...“
The New York Post reports 18th October 2025:
“Sometime later, Epstein sent her back to the politician for a second encounter conducted entirely in a cabin aboard the Lolita Express. Although the experience was far less violent, Giuffre spent the entire hour in fear he would suddenly strike or choke her, she wrote…The final breaking point came that summer when Epstein and his madam, Ghislaine Maxwell, pleaded with Giuffre to carry their child — a proposal that came with mansions, wealth and around-the-clock nannies, but would require her to sign away any legal rights…Barak has repeatedly denied Giuffre’s abuse claims or knowledge that Epstein was running a perverted sex ring…Barak was a personal friend of Epstein’s and used several million dollars of Epstein’s money to finance a security company. Records show he had visited Epstein on his private island and had boarded his private plane.”
Blackmail only works if the Kompromat is not yet public. It is the threat of making such Kompromat public that provides leverage to the blackmailer. If the information is already out there, the blackmailer has lost all power because there is no leverage. This is why disclosure becomes so important.
The information needed for full disclosure is already available, and ready to go.
Wired magazine reports 28th March 2024:
“NEARLY 200 MOBILE devices of people who visited Jeffrey Epstein’s notorious “pedophile island” in the years prior to his death left an invisible trail of data pointing back to their own homes and offices. Maps of these visitations generated by a troubled international data broker with defense industry ties, discovered last week by WIRED, document the numerous trips of wealthy and influential individuals seemingly undeterred by Epstein’s status as a convicted sex offender.”
The Times of London reports 29th March 2024:
“..another and potentially more comprehensive view of all who visited Epstein’s domain in the US Virgin Islands has been revealed in mobile phone location data collected and mapped by a data intelligence firm called Near Intelligence.
The data pinpointed the location of more than 200 phones belonging to people who visited Little St James, according to Wired magazine, which said it found the maps while searching through reports produced by one of the company’s intelligence platforms.
More than 10,000 co-ordinates formed trails to the island from 80 cities in the United States, the magazine reported. They indicated people making their way there from homes on the well-heeled island of Martha’s Vineyard, or from Nantucket, from gated communities in Michigan and Florida and from a pavement on Fifth Avenue in Manhattan, across the road from Trump Tower. The trails also led to Epstein’s mansion in Palm Beach, and his enormous ranch in New Mexico. The intelligence firm could infer, from the data, 166 locations where visitors to the island probably lived or worked, it said.”
The names of these 200 visitors to Epstein’s island must be publicised, not least so that they can no longer be blackmailed to serve foreign interests. Publicising these names destroys the blackmailer’s leverage.
Alas, this is one of those stories where there is little satisfaction in being vindicated.
We are coming.
As a caution, merely appearing on Epstein’s island, in one of his mansions, or elsewhere with him, is not conclusive proof of guilt. Such evidence does require corroboration. Radical Media advises corroborating any name suspected of being an Epstein client or collaborator, against a robust check list of Epstein related activity. We have provided a check list below….
To continue reading become a premium member of Radical Media by upgrading below. ...
Watch with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Radical Media - by Maajid Nawaz to watch this video and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.
 |
Radical Media Membership Preview
 |
| ||
Epstein's VIP Blackmail Ring: Prince Andrew - Lord Mandelson - PM Blair - PM Starmer - Grooming Gangs - PM Barak - Middle East War. Follow The Evidence.
Plus WARRIOR CREED Podcast
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
This Radical Dispatch Newszine - below - is provided free for all subscribers.
At the top of this post, Resistance Radio presents our WARRIOR CREED video/audio podcast from Tuesday 21st October 2025, with a transcript provided - Epstein’s VIP Blackmail Ring: Prince Andrew - Lord Mandelson - PM Blair - PM Starmer - Grooming Gangs - PM Barak - Middle East War. Follow The Evidence.
This podcast can be set to either audiovisual, or just audio, and is for premium members of Radical Media only. To listen, basic members should upgrade to the premium service here:
Read on now for our free Radical Dispatch.
The reader may buy Virginia Giuffre’s memoir Nobody’s Girl from here.
Epstein’s VIP Blackmail Ring:
Prince Andrew - Lord Mandelson - PM Blair - PM Starmer - Grooming Gangs - PM Barak - Middle East War.
Follow The Evidence.
- A Radical Dispatch
1) Prince Andrew
The Epstein saga just isn’t letting up for Prince Andrew.
The Times reports 19th October 2025:
“More documents related to Prince Andrew’s friendship with Jeffrey Epstein are expected to be released in the US after Democrats in Congress vowed to ‘deliver justice’ for the victims of the paedophile financier. The House of Representatives oversight committee has released tens of thousands of documents, including travel logs, pictures and messages, from Epstein’s estate over the past several weeks. The documents were obtained through a subpoena. Previous releases included evidence suggesting Andrew received massages paid for with $200 cheques and travelled in Epstein’s private jet, nicknamed the ‘Lolita Express’. On Friday, the committee issued another trove of documents, which included Epstein’s calendar showing lunches and dinners with Woody Allen, Peter Thiel, the PayPal co-founder and Mark Zuckerberg. One phone log showed two undated calls with President Trump. Andrew appeared as a passenger on four different flights.”
Fearing more is soon to be revealed, his brother King Charles has stripped Andrew of all his remaining titles except ‘Prince’, which would require a change in law.
The impetus has been provided not only by the US Congressional oversight committee’s decision to continue releasing documents related to this saga, but also to the fact that Prince Andrew accuser Virginia Giuffre has posthumously released a memoir detailing horrific accounts of her abuse.
The Times reports 20th October 2025:
“The story of Giuffre has been told and retold in the pages of newspapers and in the dockets filed in civil lawsuits, but the book offers the first full account of her life in her own words. Giuffre warns early on that it will be a difficult read. ‘I know this is a lot to take in. The violence. The bad decisions. The self harm,’ she writes. ‘But please, don’t stop reading’.”
Demands for further disclosure have been met with temporary respite, as House Speaker Mike Johnson (R) will not allow the final voter for disclosure to take her Congressional seat until the Federal shutdown ends.
The Times reports 19th October 2025:
The Times reports 19th October 2025:
“Democrats are trying to force the release of the wider Epstein files. They need 218 signatures to secure a vote in the House of Representatives. But, the party remains stuck on 217 signatures because Mike Johnson, the Republican speaker of the House, is blocking a newly elected congresswoman from taking her seat. Adelita Grijalva was elected last month, succeeding her father, Raúl Grijalva, who died earlier this year. She has vowed to provide the 218th signature once she is allowed to take her seat. However, Johnson claimed he cannot allow Grijalva to take her seat during the government shutdown. ‘We will swear her in when everybody gets back,’ he said…Thomas Massie, a Republican congressman who teamed up with Democrats to try to force the release of the Epstein files, said Johnson was ‘delaying the vote’. ‘First the British ambassador lost his job and now the prince lost his title. Don’t tell us there’s nothing in the Epstein files. The truth is coming out and we will not give up,’ he wrote on Facebook.”
King Charles is seeking to rapidly get ahead of this development. This Radical Dispatch follows the available evidence, the trail of which continues to go all the way up to multiple members of the King’s Privy Council (his cabinet). This does not bode well for the King.
Regardless, the shutdown will eventually end. And these floodgates will open.
2) Lord ‘Petie’ Mandelson
Radical Media had long been warning that this story would snowball, even as UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer inexplicably appointed Epstein’s known close friend Lord Peter Mandelson as his ambassador to the US.
Radical Media reports 12th February 2025:
It was inevitable that this move would spectacularly backfire, as it eventually did just last month.
Radical Media reports 12th September 2025
The Times reports 11th September 2025:
The Times reports 11th September 2025:
“Depth of Mandelson-Epstein relationship was new information, No 10 says. Starmer found Mandelson’s emails to Epstein ‘reprehensible’, Downing Street has said. Asked if the prime minister shared the view of two ministers who said they were disgusted and sickened by the messages, Starmer’s spokesman said: ‘I think it’s self-evident that he found the content of these emails reprehensible.’ Asked what aspect Starmer found reprehensible, he said the depth and extent of the relationship shown in the emails was ‘new information’. ‘And they show that Peter Mandelson suggested that Jeffrey Epstein’s first conviction was wrongful, should be challenged — that is why he’s been withdrawn as ambassador with immediate effect.’”
But Starmer’s decision to go ahead and appoint Mandelson raises more questions than it answers.
Click to play:
Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED “The grooming gang story isn’t a new story. The Epstein story is not a new story. What’s new here is the cover up and who was involved in the cover up and how many presidents, princes and prime ministers were involved in the cover up on behalf of Epstein - who was running a global VIP blackmail ring for pedophiles in order to acquire compromise on them so that he could blackmail them to do his bidding. And the bidding that he wanted them to do was to push forward with a globalist agenda, which included technocracy and permawar and the COVID mandates. This is how they got the politicians and the leaders to do what they wanted them to do. That’s the cover-up. So the actual real story now should be about the cover-up. And people should be very much concerned as to exactly why Keir Starmer, despite knowing what he knew about Epstein and his relationship with Mandelson, continued nevertheless to still appoint Mandelson as our ambassador to Washington DC.”
As Radical Media previously revealed in much detail, Lord Mandelson never stopped contacting or visiting Epstein long after Epstein’s first ‘sweetheart’ conviction in Florida.
Radical Media reports 11th January 2024:
All of this raises the question, who was responsible for vetting Lord Mandelson as he was appointed by PM Starmer to his latest diplomatic role in DC?
The Times reports 11th September 2025:
“Ministers insist Mandelson was vetted ‘robustly.’ The government has insisted that Lord Mandelson was subject to ‘robust security clearances and processes’ before his appointment. Stephen Doughty, the Foreign Office minister, said Epstein was a ‘despicable criminal who committed the most heinous crimes and destroyed the lives of so many women’.”
In fact, it has since been revealed that Mandelson himself admitted his friendship with Epstein during his vetting process.
The Times reports 11th September 2025:
“Lord Mandelson admitted in his vetting interview for US ambassador that he continued his relationship with the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein for many years, allies said last night, as Sir Keir Starmer faced questions from cabinet ministers about his political judgment.”
We here at Radical Media have been canceled from corporate media for far far less in our public challenge of Covid mandates.
3) PM Starmer, Jimmy Saville & Grooming Gangs
What do they have on PM Keir Starmer such that he remained loyal to Lord Mandelson right up until the day before his departure from post in Washington DC, even as Mandelson had admitted his Epstein friendship in his vetting interview?
The Times reports 10th September 2025:
“On Tuesday, Downing Street defended Mandelson and said that Starmer still had confidence in his ambassador…”
For two years prior, and despite being asked multiple times by journalists, Starmer had refused to abandon Mandelson. Why?
The Telegraph reports 21st June 2023:
“Sir Keir Starmer will continue receiving advice from Lord Mandelson, despite accusations he maintained a friendship with Jeffrey Epstein..”
This is the same Keir Starmer who as head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) failed to prosecute known serial pedophile, the late Jimmy Saville.
The Sun reports 16th June 2020:
When Prime Minister, and among his many mistakes, Boris Johnson himself challenged Starmer on his earlier role as Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) for choosing not to prosecute Britains most notorious pedophile and personal friend of King Charles, Sir Jimmy Saville.
Click to play:
PM Boris Johnson to Keir Starmer: “This Leader of the Opposition, a former Director of Public Prosecutions Mr Speaker, if anything, he spent most of his time prosecuting journalists and failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile, as far as I can make out, Mr Speaker. He, Mr Speaker, chose to use this moment, he used this moment, Mr Speaker, continually to prejudge a police inquiry. That’s what he chose to do. He’s reached his conclusions about it. I’m not going to reach any conclusions and he would be entirely wrong to do so...”
So what exactly do serial abusers have on Starmer, such that he consistently votes to protect them? Does any of this feel right to you?
Again, this is the same Keir Starmer that whipped every single one of his MPs to vote against the UK underage rape ‘grooming’ gangs inquiry.
Upon PM Starmer’s instructions, all Labour MPs initially voted against this inquiry unanimously.
Radical Media reports 8th January 2025:
The underage rape slave ‘grooming gang’ scandal is the latest in a long line of sex abuse stories and dates back some years in the UK. The issue itself is not so much news anymore, but the cover up by Prime Minister Keir Starmer is.
The Times of London has been at the forefront of seeking to expose these revelations.
The Times reports 6th January 2025:
The Times reports 6th January 2025:
“The prime minister was in charge of the Crown Prosecution Service when The Times exposed a conspiracy of silence around on-street grooming among police, councils and prosecutors in 2011. The Labour leader has used his time as director of public prosecutions to his political advantage several times.”
Here is a summary of the basic story from this author’s days on Global’s LBC radio:
Click to play:
Maajid Nawaz on Global’s LBC:
“In 27 cities with probably thousands of underage young girls, it must lead to a Stephen Lawrence style national inquiry looking into what the institutional failures have been, well here the majority of these girls were in care homes and therefore were let down by these care homes. One girl was she was impregnated twice before the age of 15 in her care home because an adult predator was allowed into their care home to statutorily rape her eventually found dead from a heroin overdose. There has been failures on an institutional level in the care homes up and down this country. There have been failures on an institutional level in the police up and down this country, and there have been failures on an institutional level in local Labor councils, probably not only Labor but mainly Labor councils up and down this country, because people have been scared of being called racist. And the fear of racism or the fear of so-called “Islamophobia” which is a misnomer, the fear more appropriately of anti-muslim bigotry, must never be an excuse to allow underage girls to be raped and abused in this way. Think of that, imagine that. 27 cities and counting because I can guarantee you we haven’t heard the end of this yet. Imagine the thousands of victims. Imagine the impunity with which these men must have been acting. Some of the girls as young as 11. One girl, if my memory serves me correctly, was in oxford one girl was even branded branded by her raper as property of, and then his name, on her leg. And I think if memory serves me correctly, that girl was 11 years old. It is an absolute disgrace. People have cared for their reputations over the safety of children in this country being raped and drugged and passed around like meat because of the bigotry and the prejudices of these Pakistani Muslim men who were looking down on these children as less than, as inferior, as some form of infidel that doesn’t deserve honour or dignity. And I address you now here, oh, woke left wing. You talk about believing the victim. Look it up. Go to your smartphone and Google Ella Hill. She writes a piece in The Independent in which she describes the religious extremist terminology her abusers were using as they were sexually exploiting her as a child, in which she talks of how they called her an infidel and how they abused her race and her lack of Islamic faith and justified treating her in this way because they viewed her as less than because they believed themselves to be Muslim supremacists. Don’t tell me that their Muslim identity had nothing to do with this. I have lived and breathed this community all of my life. I can guarantee you that it’s not the cause, but a factor in the way in which these girls was treated was the culture of these men. And as part of that culture is their religious attitude towards non-Muslims. And that is the reason that you see almost exclusively that they are men like me, Pakistani, British, Muslim. Most of them, all of them Muslims, almost all Pakistani Muslims. And the victims, almost all underaged white girls. We started to convict people. Yes, I listed those 27 cities for you. which is bad enough as it is. But where’s the accountability for the police who covered this up? Where’s the accountability for the Labour councils who covered this up? Where are the accolades for Anne Cryer MP, former Labour MP in Keeley, who raised this years and years ago? Was a sole voice, crying out into the wilderness, beseeching people to listen to her. Then came Julie Bindell, the first to write columns about this. Ignored, in fact, she writes herself that in 2007 she was looking into this and her pieces were shelved. Look how Sarah Champion was treated, Labour frontbencher who was sacked because she said this was a problem. And now finally, the independent police watchdog has said, yes, it was covered up by the police. Well, that’s not good enough because nothing short of this national and statutory inquiry will satisfy the victims and bring them dignity and honour, but also quell the anger that people are rightfully feeling as these cases unfold. As I say, it is a national disgrace.”
Keir Starmer’s role as DPP has also been raised by one of the most prominent whistleblowers of this underage rape ‘grooming’ gang scandal, former police detective Maggie Oliver.
Click to play:
Whistleblower Maggie Oliver: “I shouldn’t have had to resign. It’s still, you know, 12 years on from that day, and we are still going round this same hamster wheel.”
Correspondent: “We need to see Keir Starmer stand up in the House of Commons and issue you a full and unreserved apology, don’t we?”
Maggie Oliver: “You know what Bev? Empty words mean nothing to me. I want to see him put his actions where his mouth is you know blaming this problem on far-right extremists is actually dodging the issue. He was the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) when I resigned from Rochdale, and I resigned because the charges that were being levelled at the predators and the abusers of those men, I knew in detail. I knew what had happened to them because I’ve spoken to them all. You know, being threatened at gunpoint, being passed around a room like a bull, being raped on a daily basis. And he…made the decision alongside the prosecutors that the man who got a 13-year-old pregnant didn’t face charges of rape. He was out of prison in less than four years. As a tactical option, they put a child victim of that gang on the indictment so they could get her evidence into court without even telling her. Then they tried to take her children away from her. He was the DPP. And I’m sorry, when he says that his record is clear and good, I would take him straight back to that case, which 10 years later, Bev, the Chief Constable of Manchester has publicly acknowledged, it was borderline incompetence in the handling of it on many levels. And to this day, the CPS refused to apologise for putting that victim on the indictment as a purely tactical option. So we still have a long, long way to go. And so, you know, words like yesterday, they...can again actually are blaming victims and abuse and abuse victims for standing up for their right to have their their their abusers tackled and dealt with properly it’s..smoke and mirrors and I’ve heard these things so many times that I get really angry about it.”
Indeed, it is the cover up that has angered so many, and will continue to do so.
Click to play:
Maajid Nawaz on WARRIOR CREED: “Now, we mentioned the cover-up, which is why people are so upset. Understand why people are so upset. This is a systemic cover-up. We have institutional failures in our police, in our Labour government and in our local Labour council and in our child protection services. All of which have been complicit in covering this up and for which multiple reports have also come to this same conclusion that they’ve been covering it up. And whistleblower former police detective Maggie Oliver in particular has been speaking about Keir Starmer as director of public prosecutions, covering this up when he made the decision alongside other prosecutors that a man who got a 13-year-old pregnant should not face charges of rape.”
4) Prosecutor Nazir Afzal & the Cover Up
There really is little by way of an excuse for the abysmal failure to act. The Times even ran a front cover on the issue back in 2010.
Original Times cover story:
Activists such as Ann Cryer MP had been raising the alarm since 2003 and, much like the victims themselves, was branded a trouble maker for her efforts.
The Times reports 6th January 2025:
As for PM Starmer, the precise role that he played in making sure that relevant cases were buried has been further detailed by the Times.
The Times reports 6th January 2025:
“It was against this background that Starmer, the former human rights barrister, was selected as the surprise choice to be the director of public prosecutions (DPP). His appointment was announced in July 2008, and he took up the position in November of that year. Shortly after he took up the role, a critical child grooming case in Rochdale was dropped before trial by a CPS lawyer in July 2009. They had concluded the victim would not come across as credible, even though one of her attacker’s DNA was found on her underwear.”
The failures went beyond Starmer though, and touch on multiple institutions that are supposed to be safeguarding children but appeared instead to have been complicit in their systemic rape.
The Times reports 6th January 2025:
“There were other signs that the CPS, councils and police forces were failing victims. One serious case review, published in 2010, found ‘missed opportunities’ to help two grooming and abuse victims between 2008 and 2009. The girls, who lived in care in Derby, were instead treated as rebellious teenagers, the report found. Police became involved by chance, at a car stop, and 13 men were convicted for what investigators described as ‘a campaign of rape against children’. Other trials also hinted at the problem. Nine men were convicted in August 2010 for forcing a 14-year-old into prostitution and using her ‘as a commodity’ in Greater Manchester. The scandal lay in the cases that were not brought to trial. Starmer’s team claims these cases never reached the DPP’s office.”
Instead, what Starmer appears to have done is to appoint his lackey Nazir Afzal in order to prosecute contain the street-level cases while absolving the institutions and the people running them of their criminal failures.
The Times reports 6th January 2025:
Times reporter Andrew “Norfolk’s reports were read by Nazir Afzal, then the CPS’s national director of communities who says he immediately told Starmer this was an area that demanded more focus. Shortly afterwards, in May 2011, he moved to take up the job as chief prosecutor in the northwest. ‘They brought the Rochdale case to me, I revisited and decided it should be prosecuted. I told Keir and he said fine...‘We brought in first ever national guidelines on prosecuting child sexual abuse,’ Afzal said. ‘I led on them, but [Starmer] was with me on that journey…Every police force had their own guidance, so we persuaded the police to have one national police guideline on tackling these types of cases. Keir had conversation with the home secretary, and in 2013 [child sexual abuse] became a national policing priority. ‘He allowed me to lead a national team of specialist prosecutors, which never existed before, and commissioned to set up the first ever child sexual abuse review panel, which he jointly chaired.”
Here is prosecutor Nazir Afzal confirming the order of events.
And here is that same lackey Nazir Afzal reposting Tony Blair’s former Political Secretary who praises Afzal and PM Starmer, despite the cover up that has been, and is being revealed:
The truth is slightly less flattering for Nazir Afzal’s boss, Sir Keir Starmer.
It is because of this very cover up that a national statutory inquiry is needed, precisely as we demanded over four years ago on LBC. And it is because there was a cover up that Starmer’s Labour party are still doing everything within their power to obstruct such an inquiry.
Maajid Nawaz on GB News with Neil Oliver, 6th February 2025, Click to play:
Full interview with Neil Oliver on GB News can be found on youtube as Part 1 and Part 2.
“Pakistani street gangs are only one element and that’s why we immediately said this was a cover-up don’t just talk about the street level gangs they are organised gangs who have their connections in the police, the social services, the local councils, all the way up through the national political hierarchy of the Labour party. Now, since we said that, it all came out. We were pointing at the time to Lord Ahmed’s conviction for underage sex abuse, who was a Labour peer from Rotherham, which was a trigger case for these grooming gangs. Now that’s from right at the top. We were also pointing to Keir Starmer’s decision to appoint Peter Mandelson, as his ambassador to the US, Mandelson the same guy, without a doubt, on record in released court documents is proven to have visited Epstein’s island, to have gone to Epstein’s mansion in New York and to have gone to Paris for his birthday. Close friend of Epstein, more so than even Prince Andrew. Right? There’s more information on Mandelson’s relationship with him than there even was with Prince Andrew. So why was Starmer, look at how Prince Andrew was treated, why was Starmer rewarding Mandelson with the most diplomatic appointment on the planet for Britain, which is to America, right? Granting him diplomatic immunity is what it was about. So that’s how far up the rot goes, right to the top with Lord Ahmed and Peter Mandelson. By the way, both Labour and both from the Blair era, Mandelson was Blair’s ‘dark prince’ who had all the dirt on all of the politicians and that’s how he kept them in line, it’s why he was called the ‘dark prince’. Where do you think he got that dirt from if not Epstein, right? So that’s what was going on. Since we said all of that what got revealed? Well there was a Labour former Defence Minister who got arrested in a sting for attempting to solicit sexual favours from an underage boy, and then two police officers got arrested in Rotherham for being involved as well. This all came out after the scandal was recently resurrected by Musk. Proving that this is bigger, as you just said, Neil, than the mere street gang level. And it’s not just Pakistanis. This thing is a rot that goes through the system, and is actually what people used to refer to as ‘conspiracy theory’. It’s the global VIP pedophile ring that used to be run by Epstein, which is an acknowledged Mossad operation.”
After the Harvey Weinstein Hollywood story, revelations around the Mossad-backed Epstein global VIP pedophile ring, the P. Diddy music industry sex abuse cases, and after revelations around the Church of England mass child abuse leading to the recent resignation of the Archbishop, among multiple other such scandals, is there any doubt remaining as to our warning from 2023 below?
5) Blackmail for War
In answer to why such a vast and complex blackmail operation would be needed, one need look no further than to current events. War is hugely profitable. It also provides the ideal pretext to introduce further totalitarian technocratic control, such as digital ID cards.
Radical Media reports 3rd April 2024:
The reality is that - as the Epstein case demonstrates - powerful positions and institutions in our society have been infiltrated by people who have been severely compromised through blackmail. As such, they proceed to run these positions and institutions not in the interests of their own nation, but at the behest of the blackmailing party. This is why Western policy has seemed for years to be working against its own people.
There is no polite way to say this. Epstein’s entire global VIP pedophile ring, being exposed in real time, and connected to royalty as it is, has been one large Mossad blackmail operation in order to entrap royalty and those who serve them into pursuing the foreign policy aims of Israel.
The Daily Mail reports 4th January 2024:
“The Jeffrey Epstein list of associates unsealed by a US judge has reignited suspicions the pedophile financier was an asset for Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency. Israel’s former prime minister Ehud Barak was identified in the bombshell dossiers Wednesday night. He served as PM from 1991 to 2001 after serving in the IDF for 35 years, rising to Chief of the General Staff.”
Imagine the security clearances needed to be able to privately meet the Prime Minister of Israel no less than 36 times. It is no longer in much doubt that Epstein’s entire operation was a Mossad honeytrap designed to capture compromising material on senior figures and leverage this Kompromat so as to pursue Israel’s foreign policy aims.
The Daily Mail reports 5th December 2019:
As to the purpose of this blackmail, the Radical Dispatch reports 11th January 2024:
Is it any wonder then that even former PM Tony Blair, who launched Britain’s ill-fated invasion of Iraq, was made to meet with Epstein in Downing Street, at none other than Lord Mandelson’s request.
BBC reports 10th October 2025:
“Sir Tony Blair met with Jeffrey Epstein in Downing Street while still prime minister, following lobbying by Lord Peter Mandelson, the BBC has confirmed….Emails seen by BBC News show Lord Mandelson pushed for the meeting, telling Sir Tony’s chief of staff Jonathan Powell that Epstein was “a friend of mine” who ex-US President Bill Clinton hoped to introduce to the PM.”
Likewise, after Starmer initially blocked the UK inquiry into underage rape ‘grooming’ gangs, yet another Labour minister who supported war was exposed for similar behaviour.
Radical Media reports 15th January 2025:
The Sun reports 11th January 2025:
“FORMER Labour minister Ivor Caplin was arrested today after he was filmed allegedly trying to meet with a 15-year-old child he met online. The ex-Hove MP was stopped at his local train station by activist group Stop Stings who told The Sun they had arranged to meet him there posing as an ‘underage boy’.”
Caplin’s career is stated online as follows:
“Caplin became an Assistant Government Whip. He was a prominent supporter of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, and refused to accept a 1,000 signature petition from constituents against the invasion, resulting in regular demonstrations outside his constituency office. In June 2003 he was appointed Parliamentary under-secretary of state and Minister for Veterans at the Ministry of Defence. During his term, he introduced the Veteran’s Badge for those who had served in HM Armed Forces. He was vice chairman of Labour Friends of Israel from 1997 to 2005….He was the Chair of the Jewish Labour Movement for 2018–19.”
The arrest of such a senior former Labour minister came soon after Labour unanimously voted down an inquiry into underage rape ‘grooming’ gangs in Parliament.
Sky News reports 8th January 2025:
“A Tory bid to launch a new national inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal has been voted down by MPs amid criticism of ‘political game playing’. MPs rejected the amendment to the Children’s Wellbeing Bill by 364 to 111, a majority of 253.”
It is probably this incident with Ivor Caplin that forced Starmer’s hand to eventually allow the public inquiry into underage rape ‘grooming’ gangs, which Labour is still obstructing.
The Times reports 21st October 2025:
“One of two candidates shortlisted to run Britain’s grooming gang inquiry has pulled out of the process after two survivors of child sexual abuse resigned over a ‘toxic, fearful environment’. The withdrawal of Annie Hudson, a social worker, leaves only Jim Gamble, a former head of the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (Ceop), in the running to lead the inquiry. Jess Phillips, the home office minister, had said on Monday in a letter to the home affairs select Committee that ministers would press on with the appointment process, despite the concerns of abuse victims Fiona Goddard and Ellie Reynolds. In a letter resigning from the victims liaison panel advising the Home Office about the inquiry, Goddard said the process so far had involved ‘secretive conduct’ and instances of ‘condescending and controlling language’ towards survivors.”
6) Floodgates Will Open
But these floodgates will open. Supporting the angle that Epstein was a Mossad asset, Virginia Giuffre’s posthumous memoir contains harrowing details involving former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak.
The following revelations are graphic and may trigger survivors of sexual or other violent trauma.
Mint Press News reports 20th October 2025:
The New York Post reports 18th October 2025:
“Giuffre simply referred to the deranged man as the ‘Prime Minister,’ saying she was afraid the brute would ‘seek to hurt’ her if she printed his name. In the past, however, she pointed to Israel’s Prime Minister Ehud Barak in court filings as one of the many elites who had raped her, a claim he has repeatedly denied…In her memoir, Giuffre said she first met the ‘Prime Minister’ on Epstein’s private island in the US Virgin Islands sometime in 2002, when she was just 18. She was ordered to escort him to a cabana, but the man made it clear as soon as they were alone that ‘he wanted violence.’ ‘He repeatedly choked me until I lost consciousness and took pleasure in seeing me in fear for my life. Horrifically, the Prime Minister laughed when he hurt me and got more aroused when I begged him to stop. I emerged from the cabana bleeding from my mouth, vagina, and anus. For days, it hurt to breathe and to swallow,’ Giuffre wrote. The politician ‘raped me more savagely than anyone had before.’ She immediately rushed to Epstein and begged him not to send her back to the Prime Minister...“
The New York Post reports 18th October 2025:
“Sometime later, Epstein sent her back to the politician for a second encounter conducted entirely in a cabin aboard the Lolita Express. Although the experience was far less violent, Giuffre spent the entire hour in fear he would suddenly strike or choke her, she wrote…The final breaking point came that summer when Epstein and his madam, Ghislaine Maxwell, pleaded with Giuffre to carry their child — a proposal that came with mansions, wealth and around-the-clock nannies, but would require her to sign away any legal rights…Barak has repeatedly denied Giuffre’s abuse claims or knowledge that Epstein was running a perverted sex ring…Barak was a personal friend of Epstein’s and used several million dollars of Epstein’s money to finance a security company. Records show he had visited Epstein on his private island and had boarded his private plane.”
Blackmail only works if the Kompromat is not yet public. It is the threat of making such Kompromat public that provides leverage to the blackmailer. If the information is already out there, the blackmailer has lost all power because there is no leverage. This is why disclosure becomes so important.
The information needed for full disclosure is already available, and ready to go.
Wired magazine reports 28th March 2024:
“NEARLY 200 MOBILE devices of people who visited Jeffrey Epstein’s notorious “pedophile island” in the years prior to his death left an invisible trail of data pointing back to their own homes and offices. Maps of these visitations generated by a troubled international data broker with defense industry ties, discovered last week by WIRED, document the numerous trips of wealthy and influential individuals seemingly undeterred by Epstein’s status as a convicted sex offender.”
The Times of London reports 29th March 2024:
“..another and potentially more comprehensive view of all who visited Epstein’s domain in the US Virgin Islands has been revealed in mobile phone location data collected and mapped by a data intelligence firm called Near Intelligence.
The data pinpointed the location of more than 200 phones belonging to people who visited Little St James, according to Wired magazine, which said it found the maps while searching through reports produced by one of the company’s intelligence platforms.
More than 10,000 co-ordinates formed trails to the island from 80 cities in the United States, the magazine reported. They indicated people making their way there from homes on the well-heeled island of Martha’s Vineyard, or from Nantucket, from gated communities in Michigan and Florida and from a pavement on Fifth Avenue in Manhattan, across the road from Trump Tower. The trails also led to Epstein’s mansion in Palm Beach, and his enormous ranch in New Mexico. The intelligence firm could infer, from the data, 166 locations where visitors to the island probably lived or worked, it said.”
The names of these 200 visitors to Epstein’s island must be publicised, not least so that they can no longer be blackmailed to serve foreign interests. Publicising these names destroys the blackmailer’s leverage.
Alas, this is one of those stories where there is little satisfaction in being vindicated.
We are coming.
As a caution, merely appearing on Epstein’s island, in one of his mansions, or elsewhere with him, is not conclusive proof of guilt. Such evidence does require corroboration. Radical Media advises corroborating any name suspected of being an Epstein client or collaborator, against a robust check list of Epstein related activity. We have provided a check list below….
To continue reading become a premium member of Radical Media by upgrading below. ...
Watch with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Radical Media - by Maajid Nawaz to watch this video and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.
