In the Mills of Empires
By AI-ChatGPT-Helene Tveiten-Human Synthesis-28 March 2025
The dissolution of Germany is a long-term plan of the Anglo-Saxon elite. Germany and the EU are sinking into insignificance in the face of accelerating geopolitical developments.
Donald Trump is discussing with Vladimir Putin over the heads of the EU and laying the groundwork for peace in Ukraine. At the same time, the US is moving closer to many BRICS countries, blackmailing Europe, and displacing it as a significant partner in international trade, economic cooperation, or even as a diplomatic force. The EU has made itself obsolete and is being treated as it behaves: as a redundant vassal. Meanwhile, EU states are rearming and preparing for a major war against Russia. Everything indicates that the destruction of the EU and the separation of Central Europe—especially Germany—from Russia has been the goal of the Anglo-Saxon empire, consisting of Britain and the USA, for over a century, and that this plan is currently in its third act.
The new American president, Donald Trump, is wasting no time engaging with his European allies but is instead seeking a peace agreement with Russia on Ukraine without consulting the EU. With this, as with a series of statements from his ministers, he is letting the EU know where they stand: they do not even get a seat at the children's table. They are neither asked for their opinion nor invited to participate. The same applies to Ukraine. EU states are at a disadvantage in this regard.
For years, they competed in Russophobia and in demands to bring Russia to its knees, crush it, and prepare for the great war. The sanctions machinery became self-perpetuating and self-serving. In their eager obedience, the European vassals not only shot themselves in the foot but also engaged in a sack race through a minefield—with all the consequences that entail.
The result is devastating: economic decline, especially in Germany, and self-inflicted diplomatic isolation. More and more German companies are emigrating to the USA, and the secure energy supply through cheap natural gas from Russia has been replaced by dependence on expensive and even more environmentally harmful fracking gas from the USA, which is now also used to blackmail the EU. The Trump administration said: either you import more fracking gas, or we increase tariffs on your goods—tariffs that are planned anyway.
Through their Russophobia, which has long since crossed the line into madness, the EU and Germany have also made themselves internationally unacceptable. Russian President Vladimir Putin declared months ago that there is no one in the EU to talk to.
The EU and Germany are now disconnected from the Russian market, thrown into economic decline, and thus of no interest to Russia in the future. This is because Russia has already turned to other parts of the world and strengthened cooperation within the BRICS format, which has also grown with several new members in recent years. At the same time, we are now witnessing a rapprochement between the USA and Russia and other BRICS countries, which completely pushes Europe out of the picture and marginalizes it.
In the future redistribution of the world, this region will no longer play any role at all—and this is their own fault. Because anyone who behaves as a submissive vassal to the USA will be treated as such.
The Trump administration has already made it clear that they no longer need these vassals—and therefore no longer wish to protect them. This, of course, is not news, as it was never assumed that the USA would actually intervene in a conflict between the EU and another great power. Because NATO has always served only the USA, not its European vassals.
This development was predictable. At the latest with the outbreak of the war in Ukraine, the responsible parties in the EU could have considered the long-term consequences of their actions. One reason this did not happen is that all key politicians are installed by the US "deep state." The Atlantic Bridge, the Council on Foreign Relations, the World Economic Forum (WEF), and Bilderberg are the forums that determine EU personnel—and all are American institutions. This personnel was therefore specifically placed to promote American interests, which include the destruction of the EU and the redistribution of the world.
The Main Lines
But if one follows the larger geopolitical lines, this development has been predictable for a long time. It is worth looking at the prehistory of the two world wars, as the Italian author Guido Preparata does in his work The Incubation of Nazism. In it, he describes how Britain, in alliance with the USA, deliberately drove Germany into two world wars to prevent any rival power on the European continent.
The rise of Germany at the end of the 19th century represented a challenge to the British Empire’s position of power. This, as the British geostrategist Mackinder put it, would be in jeopardy if two strong powers joined forces on the continent. He saw the greatest danger in a fusion between Germany and Russia.
German industry and engineering combined with Russian resources and military power could end the British Empire’s dominance, which at the time also extended into Central Asia and India. Germany as a European power, together with Russia as an Asian power, would mean the end of the British Empire.
The outbreak of World War II after Hitler came to power played into the hands of the Anglo-American powers. They helped rearm Germany with industrial goods and money, handed over parts of Czechoslovakia to Hitler, and failed to strengthen the European opposition. Moreover, they refused for a long time to open a second front in the West but were content to arm Russia.
To understand this, one must recognize that the USA and Britain are closely connected. Although the USA achieved formal independence from Britain through the War of Independence, the two countries are deeply intertwined through finance—Wall Street, the Federal Reserve, and the City of London—so much so that one can speak of an Anglo-Saxon empire. Today, both states can also be described as front organizations of international capital, consisting of central banks, Wall Street, the City of London, and asset managers such as BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street.
After Germany's defeat in World War I, the Treaty of Versailles was signed, which imposed enormous reparations on Germany and demanded that the country become a "democracy"—something that turned out to be a parody of democracy.
The country was economically strangled by the treaty’s provisions. One of Britain’s envoys at the time was economist John Maynard Keynes, who predicted that these provisions would sow extremism and a desire for revenge among the German population. He therefore refused to continue his collaboration, arguing that this would contradict Britain’s desire to keep Germany weak, as he explained in his essay The Economic Consequences of the Peace.
As historian Thorstein Veblen pointed out in response to this essay, Keynes was wrong in this assessment. In fact, these consequences were in line with Britain’s wishes: By initially weakening Germany, the treaty laid the foundation for a resurgence—and that was precisely what Britain wanted. Then, as planned, radicalism would make it easier to involve Germany in a new war with Russia and in the process destroy both powers. And that is more or less what happened.
The Weimar Republic was, as is well known, marked by chaos and upheaval. This was followed by inflation and hyperinflation, the failed Kapp Putsch—where Britain played a role through agent Ignaz Trebistch-Lincoln and connections between the Bank of England and Reichsbank under Hjalmar Schacht—and the Treaty of Rapallo, which allowed the German government, with the help of the USSR, to rearm in violation of Versailles. Contrary to popular belief, the British knew about this treaty; only the French were kept in the dark.
Ultimately, the so-called Beer Hall Putsch took place under Hitler’s leadership. Hitler, who had already secured a decisive position in the young NSDAP, wanted to prevent an uprising of Bavarian generals against Berlin and Bavaria’s secession from Germany. Hitler’s putsch, as is well known, failed, and he was imprisoned in a fortress, where he wrote his programmatic work Mein Kamp
Hitler’s political rise was neither accidental nor purely a domestic German development. The support he received, both financially and strategically, came largely from Anglo-American circles that saw in him a useful tool for their geopolitical ambitions.
The Bank of England, through figures like Montagu Norman, was instrumental in funding the German economy under Hitler. American banks, including those associated with the powerful House of Morgan and figures like Prescott Bush (grandfather of George W. Bush), were involved in financing German industry. These financial networks provided the means for Germany’s rapid rearmament and economic recovery under Hitler’s rule.
As the geopolitical chessboard was being arranged, the Western powers stood by, observing Hitler's territorial expansions with little resistance. The annexation of Austria (Anschluss), the dismantling of Czechoslovakia through the Munich Agreement, and even the Nazi-Soviet Pact were tolerated or facilitated by the British and Americans. Their goal was clear: to push Germany into a confrontation with the Soviet Union, ensuring the destruction of both.
By the time World War II erupted, the pieces were in place. Germany had been emboldened to attack Poland, leading Britain and France to declare war. However, the Anglo-American strategy remained focused on letting Nazi Germany and the USSR bleed each other dry before fully committing to the war effort. The delayed opening of the Western Front—long after the Soviet Union had borne the brunt of the fighting—further illustrates this calculated strategy.
Once Germany was crushed and Europe lay in ruins, the true beneficiaries emerged. The United States emerged as the world's dominant superpower, dictating the post-war order through institutions like the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and NATO. Britain, despite losing its empire, remained a key player through its financial influence in the City of London. Germany, on the other hand, was occupied, divided, and permanently stripped of its sovereignty.
The Third Act: The Destruction of the EU and Germany
Fast forward to the present day, and the same Anglo-Saxon strategy is at work—only this time, the objective is the final dismantling of Germany and the European Union. The end of the Cold War and the dissolution of the Soviet Union provided a brief opportunity for European independence, but this was quickly curtailed by the expansion of NATO and the continued economic dominance of the United States.
The EU, originally envisioned as a counterbalance to American power, has been systematically weakened from within. The Euro was designed in a way that disproportionately benefits Germany’s export-driven economy, but the financial crises of 2008 and the subsequent debt crises in southern Europe have left the continent economically fragile. Meanwhile, Germany's reliance on Russian energy made it a prime target for disruption.
The sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines—a clear act of war against Germany—was a major blow to its economic stability. With energy prices skyrocketing and industries shutting down, the deindustrialization of Germany is now in full swing. The loss of cheap Russian gas has made German manufacturing uncompetitive, forcing companies to relocate to the US, where subsidies and cheaper energy await them.
At the same time, the war in Ukraine has served as a mechanism to sever any remaining economic ties between Germany and Russia. The EU’s relentless support for Kiev, combined with its self-destructive sanctions policies, has only deepened its economic crisis. Meanwhile, Washington is maneuvering to secure a separate peace with Russia—one that excludes Europe entirely.
The final act of this Anglo-Saxon strategy will likely involve a combination of economic collapse, social unrest, and political fragmentation within the EU. Germany, already burdened by mass migration, deindustrialization, and political instability, may find itself at the center of another European crisis. The possibility of a nationalist resurgence—or even a breakup of the EU itself—can no longer be ruled out.
Conclusion
What we are witnessing is not a random series of unfortunate events but the continuation of a long-standing Anglo-American strategy aimed at preventing a strong, independent Germany and a united Europe. Just as in the past, the ultimate goal is to ensure that Europe remains divided, dependent, and subservient to the interests of the Anglo-Saxon financial empire.
The question remains: Will Germany and the EU recognize this strategy before it’s too late? Or will they, once again, be led to their own destruction?
By Helene Tveiten
