THE WORLD DOMINANT COMPANY SERCO.

By SOTON- ChatGPT - Human Synthesis - 17 March 2024

Serco Group plc is a British outsourcing company with operations spanning across various sectors including, military, transport, healthcare, justice, immigration, and citizen services. It is one of the world's largest providers of public services.

Here's an overview of Serco:

1. Background: Serco was founded in 1929 as a UK division of the Radio Corporation of America (RCA). It initially focused on providing radio and other electronic services.
2. Diverse Operations: Serco operates in over 30 countries, employing more than 50,000 people worldwide. Its services cover a wide range of sectors including:
   • Military: Serco provides support services to military forces around the world, including training, logistics, and base operations support.
   • Transport: Serco operates transportation services such as railways, ferries, and air traffic control systems.
   • Healthcare: In the healthcare sector, Serco manages hospitals, medical facilities, and provides support services.
   • Justice and Immigration: Serco operates prisons, detention centers, and provides services related to immigration and border control.
   • Citizen Services: This includes services like managing local government facilities, citizen support services, and contact centers.
3. Controversies: Serco has faced several controversies over the years, particularly related to its management of public services. For example:
   • In 2013, it was revealed that Serco and another company had overcharged the UK government for electronic monitoring of offenders.
   • There have been criticisms regarding the quality of services provided by Serco in some sectors, such as healthcare and immigration detention.
   • Concerns have been raised about the privatization of essential public services and the role of profit-driven companies like Serco in delivering them.
4. Global Reach: Serco's operations extend beyond the UK to countries such as the United States, Australia, Saudi Arabia, and others. It often secures contracts with governments and organizations to provide essential services.
5. COVID-19 Pandemic: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Serco played a role in managing various aspects of the response, including operating testing centers and supporting vaccination efforts in some countries.
6. Financial Performance: Serco's financial performance has varied over the years, influenced by factors such as contract wins, controversies, and economic conditions in the regions where it operates.

Overall, Serco is a significant player in the outsourcing industry, providing a wide range of services to governments and organizations globally. However, its operations have been subject to scrutiny and controversy, particularly concerning the delivery and management of public services.

CERCOS CONNECTION TO THE ISRAELI FORCES

Serco does not have direct connections to the Israeli forces in the sense of being a contractor specifically for the Israeli military or defense establishment. However, like many multinational companies, Serco operates in various countries around the world, including Israel. In some cases, its services may indirectly support government agencies, including military or security forces, through contracts for facilities management, logistics, or other support services.

It's worth noting that Serco's operations in Israel, if any, would likely be subject to the same scrutiny and controversy that surround its operations elsewhere, particularly if those services are perceived as enabling or supporting contentious government policies or actions. However, without specific information on contracts or operations in Israel, it's challenging to provide detailed insights into any connections between Serco and the Israeli forces.

IS CERCO SUPPLYING UKRAINE?

No reported information indicating that Serco Group plc, a British outsourcing company, was directly supplying goods or services to Ukraine. However, it's essential to note that the situation may have changed since then. Companies can enter into contracts or agreements at any time, and news about such deals might not always be immediately available or widely reported.

If you're specifically interested in whether Serco has supplied goods or services to Ukraine, especially in the context of recent events or developments, I would recommend checking the latest news sources or official statements from Serco for the most accurate and up-to-date information.

CERCO AND THE WEF

As of my last update in January 2022, there was no widely reported information indicating a direct partnership or significant collaboration between Serco Group plc and the World Economic Forum (WEF). The World Economic Forum is an international organization that primarily engages with government, business, and civil society leaders to address global issues through conferences, initiatives, and research.

However, both Serco and the World Economic Forum operate in sectors and industries that intersect with various aspects of global governance, public policy, and business. It's possible that representatives from Serco might attend WEF events or participate in discussions related to topics such as infrastructure, technology, or public-private partnerships.

If you're interested in any recent developments or potential collaborations between Serco and the World Economic Forum, I would recommend checking the latest news sources or official statements from both organizations for the most accurate information.

WHO SITS ON THE CERCO BOARD?

As of my last update in January 2022, the composition of Serco Group plc's board of directors may have changed since then. However, here is a general overview of the board structure and some key members who were in prominent positions as of that time:

1. Chairman: The Chairman of Serco Group plc oversees the board of directors and provides leadership to the company's governance. The chairman as of January 2022 was Roy Gardner.
2. CEO (Chief Executive Officer): The CEO is responsible for the overall management and strategic direction of the company. As of January 2022, the CEO of Serco Group plc was Rupert Soames.
3. Executive Directors: These are individuals who are part of the company's executive leadership team and also serve on the board. They may hold specific operational roles within the company. Examples of executive directors at Serco might include the CEO (if also serving on the board) or other top executives.
4. Non-Executive Directors: These are individuals who provide independent oversight and bring diverse expertise to the board. They are not involved in the day-to-day operations of the company but play a crucial role in governance and decision-making. Non-executive directors may include individuals with backgrounds in finance, industry, or public service.

Please note that board compositions can change due to retirements, appointments, or other factors. For the most up-to-date information on Serco Group plc's board of directors, I would recommend visiting the company's official website or referring to recent corporate governance reports or filings.

THE NAMES OF THE BOARD MEMBERS

As of my last update in January 2022, the names of some key individuals on Serco Group plc's board of directors were as follows:

1. Roy Gardner - Chairman
2. Rupert Soames - Chief Executive Officer
3. Angus Cockburn - Chief Financial Officer
4. Sir John Roy Major - Non-Executive Director
5. Rachel Lomax - Non-Executive Director
6. Peter Ventress - Senior Independent Director
7. Ian El-Mokadem - Non-Executive Director
8. Philippa Hird - Non-Executive Director
9. Rachel Lomax - Non-Executive Director

Please note that board compositions can change over time due to retirements, appointments, or other factors. For the most current information on Serco Group plc's board of directors, it is recommended to consult the company's official website or recent corporate governance reports.

SERCO: The Corporate Octopus Wrapped Around the U.S. National Security State

It is noteworthy that SERCO started off as a division of old RCA company.  As flows:

Serco was founded in 1929 as RCA Services Limited, a United Kingdom division of the Radio Corporation of America and initially provided services to the cinema industry. It changed its name to Serco in 1987 and has been a London Stock Exchange listed company since 1988.
(Source: Serco)

So the 64 thousand dollar question is how, and most importantly why, a British Corporation controls so many critical functions within the United States of America, as well as within many other key industrialized nations around the world?

There is only one answer: Because SERCO is a foreign multinational corporation, it can do things at its headquarters in Hook, Hampshire, England, United Kingdom, that a U.S. company could simply not get away with.

The best illustration of this fact of the U.S. government–U.K. corporate cozy relationship is the BP Gulf oil spill.  The excerpt below delineates the basic scheme that plays out across the planet 24/7, especially where plausible deniability or safe distance is needed for the U.S. Federal Government.

Well, not quite. You see, BP, as a foreign multi-national corporation, can do things in the process of exploration, drilling and extraction of oil that US-based companies can’t do. What and why, you may ask, would a foreign national corp (short for corpse) with a track record like BP’s be given so much latitude? How could they, of all oil giants, be the beneficiary of such permitting largesse, regulatory laxity and freedom of practice?

Well, first of all, they were permitted to drill at depths to which no one else could drill – legally – because of the mother lodes waiting at the tip of their humongous drill bits. In the instant case we’re talking at the very least 50 to 100 million barrels of oil. Also, by their convenient foreign corporate distance from the US Government, they were practically immune to various oversight regimes that are normally imposed on their US counterparts. Wink, wink (|) (|)
(Source: The BP Gulf Oil Spill: A Matter Of National Security?)

What the SERCO researcher should glean from this quite telling disclosure is that the U.S. Government reflexively outsources every single service or function, dirty job or unsavory task that it needs to distance itself from.  In the case of conducting extremely risky and outright dangerous oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, the globalists chose BP to do the dirty work.  

In that particular instance it had everything to do with liability — financial and legal.  However, the primary reason for such an arms distance government-corporate relationship is the ‘necessary’ buffer that permits the spurious claim of plausible deniability.

SERCO is handed the job of serving a multitude of patently illegal contracts executed by the U.S. government.  They routinely perform some of the most shady services within the most corrupt sectors of the national security state apparatus.  Now the reader understands why they whitewash their corporate slogan/tagline “Bringing service to life”.  They sure do — they bring services that nobody else will touch because of their inherent threat to life.

Whose life?  Everybody and anybody involved with the SERCO ‘services’.  Yes, what they really do is that perilous to people and dangerous to property.  The link below provides some of the details to the convoluted but true back story of the highly mysterious disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 … and the direct involvement of SERCO.

How was SERCO involved with the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370?

Obamacare: A SERCO Contract that Controls the US Healthcare System

Obviously it was no accident of good fortune that SERCO was chosen to process Obamacare applications.[1]  What, pray tell, is more important to control than the healthcare delivery system of any nation.  When you control the healthcare services, you control the health of the citizens.  When you control their health, you effectively control them.  If you don’t believe this, then please read the flowing exposé.

With this hidden knowledge it is now much easier to understand why SERCO was the recipient of a literal barrage of bad press right in the thick of the Obamacare rollout debacle.  The headlines below are by purposeful design, but not because SERCO screwed up.  Did SERCO really do the things that have been reported in these articles?  Maybe; maybe not. Probably they did; however, these stories were specifically run to confer street cred to their reputation of corporate corruption and irresponsibility.

Obamacare Serco Scandal Grows: Arkansas office also pays people to do nothing

White House Hired Sham Foreign Company for Obamacare, Employees ‘Do Nothing’

Serco’s Checkered History

Serco: Obamacare Contractor Exposed Running Fight Club at Prison

Obamacare Contractor Under Fire

Assume that they really are responsible for these unparalleled fiascos and then you will comprehend the strategy which has been used all along to make the taxpayer think that SERCO is just another greedy, incompetent government contractor.

No, they are not.

This image has been carefully sculpted over decades to convince (deceive) the general public that SERCO is too incompetent and irresponsible to perpetrate the countless black operations which they carry out on a regular basis.  

In fact, they have a very critical mission in the execution of some of the most highly consequential implementation plans having to do with everything from 9/11 to the Oklahoma City bombing, from FEMA to the Department of Homeland Security, from Obamacare to NSA surveillance and spying, from the Russian warplane shootdown over Turkey to the Benghazi CIA gun-running operation, from the Syrian War to the arming of the Islamic State.

And these examples are only the least consequential; the others are so secret and highly classified that Hillary Clinton was forced to set up her own personal email and home server in order to privately communicate about the much more [illegal, unlawful and illicit] serious business.

Yes, that’s precisely why she stonewalled the House Committee for years and was unwilling to turn over her emails … or even her server which was effectively the property of the State Department, since it was used to conduct official government business. Whenever and wherever SERCO is involved with the affairs of government, you know that there is something very, VERY wrong going on.

Conclusion

In reality, SERCO is just one of hundreds of government contractors, many of which perform similar [CLANDESTINE] services.  Just like the U.S. Armed Forces frequently outsource their special security contracts to firms comprised of prior military mercenaries, there are outsourcing companies for every service and product under the sun.   In this way, the revolving door between the government and corporate sectors is now moving faster after than ever.

The more politically sensitive and/or militarily dangerous any particular mission is, the more firms like SERCO are utilized to do the dirty work… real dirty work.  Especially in cases like 9/11 and Sandy Hook, plausible deniability becomes the overriding factor.  This is exactly why the U.S. Government gave BP total control over the BP Gulf oil spill crime scene.  Not only were they a British multinational company headquartered in London, England, they could get away with criminal conduct that would have shut down an American company.

Final Point: Outsourcing the most repugnant and unlawful operations of government has been the primary way for keeping it off the front page for decades.  However, even the extraordinary rendition programs post 9/11 can be exposed when the right whistleblower wanders into the wrong place at the wrong time (actually the right place at the right time).

Let’s face it, when government-sponsored abductions and the extrajudicial transfer of those abductees from one country to another are perpetrated in order to illegally torture those individuals, the Government-Corporate Complex that supports these blackops places itself in serious jeopardy.  In this manner have the SERCOs of the world been put on notice.

State of the Nation

Serco-run immigration detention center in Australia

Nauroze Anees spent more than 1,000 days in a Serco-run immigration detention centre in Australia, but for most of that time, he had no idea he was the subject of a Security Risk Analysis Tool, or SRAT, that determined where he was accommodated and whether he was handcuffed outside the centre.

The secretive SRAT attempts to calculate a detainee’s “risk” for violence, escape or self-harm. But lawyers, immigration insiders and government reports say the tool regularly rates people as high risk based on “unwarranted” escalations and inaccurate information – with devastating consequences.

Anees said: “Serco is essentially the judge, jury and executioner.”