4 min read

People must learn some basic things about the Norwegian Legal system

1. The Supreme Court never does anything to weaken the EEA.

2. Ecocrime never investigates people at the top of the political power pyramid. The cat does not bite the hand that feeds it.

And by extension, one can derive a number of other corresponding rules that apply to the Norwegian system.

If you learn this, you will have fewer disappointments and realize that it is the system that must be fought if you want change.

Supreme Court

Marius Reikerås writes on  Facebook:

These 17 judges voted and ruled in favor of the state in the ACER case. They have relied on the assessments that come from the Government Attorney / Department of Justice's legal department and the Borgarting Court of Appeal. Perhaps it is not so strange when 16 of the 17 judges have a previous professional background precisely from the Government Attorney / Department of Justice's legal department and from the Borgarting Court of Appeal?

Judges in the ACER case with previous professional experience from the Department of Justice's legal department:

1. Justice Toril Marie Øie, background from the Department of Justice's legal department,

2. Judge Wilhelm Matheson, background from the Department of Justice's legal department,

3. Judge Henrik Bull, background from the Department of Justice's legal department,

4. Judge Per Erik Bergsjø, background from the Department of Justice's legal department,

5. Judge Arne Ringnes, background from the Department of Justice's legal department,

6. Judge Espen Bergh, background from the Department of Justice's legal department,

7. Judge Knut Erik Sæther, background from the Department of Justice's legal department,

8. Judge Thom Arne Hellerslia, background from the Department of Justice's legal department.

9. Judge Wenche Elizabeth Arntzen, background from both the Department of Justice's legal department and the Government Attorney

Judges in the ACER case with previous professional experience from the Government Attorney:

10th Judge Aage Thor Falkanger, background from the Government Attorney,

11. Judge Bergljot Webster, background from the Government Attorney,

12. Judge Borgar Høgetveit Berg, background from the Government Attorney,

13. Judge Ingvald Falch, background from the Government Attorney,

14. Judge Kine Steinsvik, background from the Government Attorney,

Judges in the ACER case with previous professional experience from the Borgarting Court of Appeal:

15. Judge Cecilie Østensen Berglund, background from the Borgarting Court of Appeal,

16. Judge Kristin Normann, background from the University of Oslo, Borgarting Court of Appeal,

A judge in the ACER case who does not have a background from the Department of Justice's legal department, the Government Advocate or , Judgethe Borgarting Court of Appeal:

17. Judge Erik Thyness, background from Sør – Gudbrandsdal district court.

Ecocrime

Reikerås  comments  that Økokrim will not investigate Erna Solberg:

There is something surreal about this.

Here, first Erna Solberg, then Pål Lønseth and then former first state prosecutor in Økokrim, current lawyer for Sindre Finnes, Thomas Skjelbred, sit in Dax 18 to talk about "Sindre Finnes is relieved that Økokrim is not opening an investigation."

Firstly: It was Erna Solberg's government that appointed the former State Secretary in the Department of Justice, Pål Lønseth, as the new Økokrim - chief in July 2020.

Secondly: Lønseth sits openly on Dax 18 and acknowledges that the conclusion not to investigate Finnes is based on information that Finnes himself gave. It gives the impression that the top of the elite can dictate the conclusions of public institutions, such as Økokrim.

Thirdly: Sindre Finnes' lawyer, Thomas Skjelbred, has himself worked as the first state prosecutor for Økokrim.

Comment: Yes, exactly, that's how the Norwegian system is

Pål Steigan

Pål Steigan. b. 1949 has worked with journalism and the media most of his life. In 1967 he was editor of Ungsosialisten. In 1968, he helped found the newspaper Klassekampen. In 1970, he helped found the publishing house Oktober, where he was also chairman of the board for a period. Steigan was the initiator and first editor of the journal Røde Fane (now Gnist).

From 1985 to 1999 he was encyclopedia editor at Cappelen's publishing house and published, among other things, Europe's first encyclopedia on CD-ROM and the internet edition of CAPLEX in 1997. He created the blog steigan.no and later gave it to the company Mot Dag AS, which turned it into an online newspaper. Steigan was chairman of AKP(ml) 1975–84. Steigan has written several books, including the autobiography En folkefiende (2013).

Editor Comments.

You only need to say Que Bono? Who is this system best suited for? The worldwide Deep State that holds power in the US, EU and other affiliated countries. Our judges in the Supreme Court and Økokrim are only puppets who must adapt to their call. If you examine the 9-year-old list of participants in the WEF's class members in Young, Ambitious World Leaders, you will probably find several of our legal employees. Finis Causae!

Complaints to The European Court of Human Rights must first go through several steps to the Supreme Court and their judgment must be attached. Our Supreme Court judges are then entitled to DIRECT telephone contact with the European Court of Human Rights judges who then together make a decision in the current case without contact with the complainant.

After large expenses for solicitors etc. The complainant then submits the Norwegian court decision as well as HIS view on the case to the European Court of Human Rights, who then after a good amount of time responds with a court decision in accordance with their previous conversation/s with our Supreme Court judge. Corruption totalis!