Apr 14, 2023 39 min read

Earth as Weapon-Geoengineering as War

Earth as Weapon/Geoengineering as War

di Claudia von Werlhof*

Abstract: This book is a globally unique documentation by Dr. Rosalie Bertell. I think it is

one of the most important books of the 21st century. In addition to the author’s original text

from the year 2000 there are various updates by herself until 2011, and additional articles

written by international experts. As the founder of the “Planetary Movement for Mother

Earth” which was organized after having known Bertell’s work (2010) in order to distribute it

always more, I have contributed to the book by organizing its translation and publication.

Rosalie has named me her representative in the German speaking part of the world. When

Rosalie Bertell has passed, she was 83 years old. We learn from her that the free expression of

opinions and thoughts about the topic in question, as well as a whole collection of detailed

scientific facts, as presented by her, have been suppressed to be discussed for decades. For me

there needs to be a public discussion and a theoretical clarification asking the question: In

which of the academic traditions, worldviews, in what logics, politics, and motivation does

the literally inconceivable fit that Rosalie Bertell is describing? What are the consequences to

be drawn?

Who was Rosalie Bertell (1929-2012)?

Dr. Rosalie Bertell was born in 1929 in the United States. She earned a PhD in

Biometry at the Catholic University of America, Washington DC, in 1966. She

holds nine honorary doctor’s degrees, and she won numerous prizes, among them

the “Right Livelihood Award”, RLA (1986); she co-founded multiple organizations

including the “International Institute of Concern for Public Health” (IICPH) in To-

ronto, Canada (1984) and the “International Physicians for Humanitarian Medi-*

Nata a Berlino nel 1943, Claudia von Werlhof si è laureata in economia e in seguito

ha conseguito il

dottorato in sociologia presso l’Università di Colonia; ha insegnato all’Università di

Bielefeld e dal

1988 al 2011 come professoressa emerita (Political Science and Women’s Studies)

all’Università di

Innsbruck. Nel 2010 ha dato vita alla Fondazione “Planetary Movement for Mother Earth” e nel 2015

alla rivista “BOOMERANG – Journal for the Critique of Patriarchy”. Tra le sue opere in inglese si

ricorda: Women, the Last Colony, Zed, London 1988; There is an Alternative, Zed, London 2001, The

Failure of Modern Civilization and the Struggle for a “Deep” Alternative, Lang, Frankfurt-New

York-Paris 2011. In Italiano è recentemente uscito il volume, recensito in questo numero della rivista,

Nell’Età del Boomerang. Contributi alla teoria critica del patriarcato, Unicopli, Milano 2014.

1 This essay is a Presentation and an interpretation of the book by Rosalie Bertell and its updated

German version, Kriegswaffe Planet Erde (3rd ed. 2016).

Claudia von Werlhof

DEP n. 35 / 2017

131

cine” in Geneva, Switzerland (1999). She has worked as an appraiser for the UN,

worked in more than 60 countries for this institution, and was a life-long member

of the Roman Catholic Congregation “Grey Nuns of the Sacred Heart”, Pennsylva-

nia, USA. Rosalie Bertell is concerned about human health, the environment and

the planet as a whole respectively, and about a warning referring to the dangers we

face. Her very first book dealt with nuclear dangers: “No Immediate Danger?

Prognosis for a Radioactive Earth”. She was awarded the RLA for this very publi-

cation in the year of the MCA in Chernobyl 1986. Due to the several hundreds or

even more times greater ultimate MCA in Fukushima in 2011 this book is now

more relevant than ever.

If the public were to discover the real health costs of nuclear contamination, a cry would arise

from every part of the world and the people would refuse to continue to passively contribute

with their own death! (Bertell 1985, p. xiii)

For today she states:

What is planned now are climate and weather wars, wars in which earthquakes and volcanoes,

floods and droughts, hurricanes and monsoon rains will play a role (Bertell 2013, p. 57).

The dangers that we people and the planet are facing today are far more devel-

oped in the post-nuclear era without that the dangers of the nuclear one would have

diminished.

Rosalie Bertell is an ethicist of the same magnitude as before her Rachel Carson

with her book “Silent Spring” about the fifties and sixties of the 20th century, who

was the first to create awareness about the spreading chemical contamination in na-

ture, and its ramifications in regard to steadily growing cancer rates (Carson 1962).

Bertell, too, wants to deliver a wakeup call for people to become active from

below. Her hope is that a peaceful, cooperative and wiser world will emerge. The

earth is still a wonderful planet, so she believes at the end of her book, as she calls

upon us all “to respect it, to love it and to save it!” (Bertell 2013, p. 439).

Bertell is an ecofeminist and a pacifist in the best sense of the word. She stands

for respect of the rights of Mother Earth as a “cosmic being”, and of all beings up-

on, beneath, and above her. She argues for the abolition of the military and of war,

for the end of patriarchy as the attempt to dominate all life and meanwhile the earth

itself, and for the end of capitalism as the raving and reckless looting of the whole

planet.

She stands for the peaceful resolution of conflicts through international courts,

and for the necessary foundation of an environmental court that will preserve the

interests of the Earth and its safety and integrity, as well as rule over compensation

for inflicted damage. Bertell is a most sensible thinker, crystal-clear and keen; she

had a sixth sense for the uncovering of hidden information, she was committed and

courageous, and she never gave up even though she has been threatened by several

attacks on her life.

As a Catholic nun she was backed by her Congregation “Grey Nuns of the Sa-

cred Heart” in the US and had therefore not been dependent on funding by individ-

uals or institutions.

Claudia von Werlhof

DEP n. 35 / 2017

132

Why is this book so important?

a) It is a history of the ongoing destruction of planet Earth through the de-

velopment and employment of new military technologies

b) It shows the reaction of the public and of social movements

c) It should be the end of the “conspiracy theory” accusations

d) It shows the overall damages to the planet

e) It needs more of a theoretical explanation

f) It shows the legal situation

This book discusses the history of an ongoing destruction of our planet,

caused by applied natural science, corporate capital, and the military

Since World War II the development and employment of new military technol-

ogies in the East and the West have been the basis of destructions in the very “life

systems”, as Bertell calls them, of our planet. The book presents us with a unique

historical documentation, which reads like a breathtaking thriller. Its scope ranges

from chemical, biological, and nuclear technological development and warfare to

the post nuclear, especially in the field of electromagnetic “plasma” weapons, not

only threatening to wipe out all life on earth using technologies that are able to

produce huge catastrophes, but also threatening to destroy the planet itself. The es-

sence of the thriller Rosalie Bertell has written lies precisely in this escalation. For,

it is literally this planetary dimension, which connected to warfare that has been

taking action for a long time already, is completely new and unimagined. The be-

ginning of this development started with the use of detrimental substances in indus-

trial agriculture, and in the medical field – such as herbicides, pesticides, deter-

gents, chlorine, and anesthetics –, which were used during both world wars. It was

Rachel Carson (Carson 1962), the first “ecofeminist”, who protested against this

development.

The story continues with rocket technology and the atmospheric, surface, and

underground nuclear and hydrogen bomb tests that have been ongoing since the

end of World War II. There have been around 2.300 tests between 1945 and 1998

(Bertell 2013, p. 323) beginning with Hiroshima/Nagasaki up to the many tests in

the western parts of the United States, in Central Asia and the South Pacific; more

than half of them instigated by the US. These tests mark the beginning of a system-

ic radioactive contamination of the earth and the application of nuclear processes

and radiation to food and for medical purposes. The nuclear tests caused the first

damages to the ozone layer and all other layers of the atmosphere, and they were

particularly detrimental to the layers of the Van Allen Belts, which determine the

earth’s magnetic field.

Due to a lack of knowledge about the functions of the upper atmospheric layers

in regard to the preservation of the earth’s life support systems, as Bertell calls

them, there was complete ignorance about the effects (exo-)atmospheric nuclear

testing could possibly cause. The military scientists acted by “trial and error”. Na-

ture’s reaction to an attack on it is very self would just have to be seen (Bertell

2013, pp 58ss, 151, 156-158, 167, 476).

Claudia von Werlhof

DEP n. 35 / 2017

133

The damages to this sensitive mantle of the atmosphere, however, are unac-

counted for until today and it remains unclear, if they will ever vanish again. We

may never grasp the meaning of the earth’s “life systems” of which the electro-

magnetic field is a part, or understand the changes it has undergone.

In addition, experiments with the weather began to take place, reaching a first

climax during the Vietnam War. They started with experiments on an artificially

prolonged monsoon season, with artificially intensified severe weather episodes,

using lethal chemicals such as Monsanto’s “Agent Orange”, which was dispersed

through sprayings by airplanes, so that the trees would lose their leaves. These ex-

periments moved on to the attempt of creating a hole in the ozone layer, with the

objective of triggering a collapse of Vietnamese agriculture through the induction

of unfiltered cosmic radiation, consisting of gamma rays, x rays, infrared rays, UV

rays, or certain other microwaves, from which intact layers of the atmosphere pro-

tect the earth (Bertell 2013, p. 230).

Meanwhile the hole in the ozone layer above Antarctica and the one that has

formed recently and for the first time over the Arctic, probably due to radioactivity

from Fukushima, allow numerous types of radiation, including the most harmful, to

penetrate the atmosphere. Beyond that, this type of radiation is additionally manu-

factured for medical and electronic use down here (a.a.O.), following the principle

of using war technologies in peace as well.

Further, the strategy around rockets and space travel, including supersonic

flight, space stations, satellites, and the SDI-“Star Wars”-Program (Bertell 2013,

pp. 184-188; 258ss), centers around projects designed to obtain military control of

the Earth from space. “The space will be the next battlefield” (Bertell 2013, p.

177). For this reason, thermonuclear bombs have circled above our heads to ensure

swifter bombarding of targets on earth, and we have been endangered by plutonium

that has been used to fuel rockets like the Cassini during its mission to Saturn,

starting in 1997, a potential for widespread and lethal contamination in case of an

accident.

Finally, experiments with EM (electromagnetic) waves and the heating up of

the upper layers of the atmosphere (Bertell 2013, p. 139ss), called “ionosphere”,

from an altitude of 80 km on, began in the 1960ies and 1970ies by influencing this

electromagnetically charged layer through the use of “ionospheric heaters”. The

most famous of these “heaters” being HAARP (High-Frequency Active Auroral

Research Project) in Alaska, built up later in the 1990ies, huge radar installations

with antenna and a special energy supply (Bertell 2013, pp. 273ss). According to

Bertell, the Arctic region has been subjected to a deliberate thawing process

through the utilization of EM-ELF (extreme low frequency) waves, action that

seems to have been agreed upon by the former Soviet Union and the United States

in Vladivostok 1974 already (Bertell 2013, p. 256, 445; Ponte 1976; MacDonald

1968).

This is a kind of borderline science, since much of this knowledge remains out-

side of the scientific discourse familiar to us. Practically nobody is aware of this

new science, even though nearly 40 years have passed. In contrast, scientists, re-

searchers and the population are made to believe that greenhouse CO2 gas emis-

sions by the civilian industry are the cause for the swift thawing of the Arctic re-

Claudia von Werlhof

DEP n. 35 / 2017

134

gion, and are proof of climate warming through CO2 in general! (Storr in Bertell

2013, p. 533). Meanwhile Exxon Mobile and its Russian colleagues have begun to

stake out areas of the Arctic region in their quest for oil.

In the meantime there have been continuous “official” wars in which, however,

new unofficial weapons were put to use, such as laser guided weapons and espe-

cially DU (depleted uranium) ammunition, produced from de-riched Uranium 238

which originates in nuclear plants. This has been the case in the Balkans, during the

Gulf War with Iraq/Kuwait, and everywhere else since – in Afghanistan, Iraq, and

in Libya.

As a result, radioactive contamination in these areas and for those living in the-

se regions temporarily or permanently has increased drastically (see the “Gulf War

Syndrome”, Günther 2002). Research by the geophysicist Leuren Moret has pro-

vided evidence of a significant decline in birthrates; a rebound cannot be expected

(Moret 2011c, d). In other words, radiation has actually already led to a real decline

in population in the respective areas. Fukushima’s contribution to this development

(Moret 2011 a, b) is still completely unforeseeable.

After the many smaller facilities for manipulating the layers of the atmosphere

with EM – electromagnetic – waves were installed, such as Poker Flats/Alaska,

Plattville/Colorado, and HIPAS/Alaska, the larger ones emerged. This is to be seen

in Arecibo/Puerto Rico, EISCAT in Tromsö in Northern Norway, as well as the so

called “Woodpecker” in the Soviet Union (Bertell 2013, p. 288ss), and since the

early 1990ies the HAARP antenna farms with 180 radar towers in 2002. They are

meanwhile accompanied by facilities in the Netherlands and Sweden, Israel, Aus-

tralia, China, and other countries (recently probably MARLOW near Rostock,

northern Germany) as well as by mobile x-band radar as swimming supports, capa-

ble of ranging beyond the horizon. About two dozen of these facilities are estimat-

ed to be globally operational today. In the year 2013 a new one, MUOS, for satel-

lite coordination, has been built in Sicily (MUOS 2015). This way, a bombardment

or heating up of the ionosphere can occur simultaneously, separately or in opposi-

tion to each other, be it for experimental purposes or as a planned attack (see “Su-

perDARNS” in Bertell 2013, p. 283ss).

For this to work, the electrically charged air of the ionosphere, the “plasma”,

which is a unique aggregate state beyond a solid, fluid, or gaseous state (Bertell

2013, p. 143), is heated up using the power of the ionospheric heaters that can add

up to GIGA watts, billions of watts. This operation is causing the plasma to densify

and to bulge, creating a mirror like reflector from which rays of energy, sent by

ionospheric heaters, can be bounced off at any desired angle, and be redirected

back to a corresponding point on or under the earth’s surface (Bertell 2013, p.

279ss). From there the great destruction emanates, that until now could not be ex-

plained as an artificially induced catastrophe, though the ENMOD Convention of

the UN from 1977, after the Vietnam War, already talked about them, trying to

forbid its military use (UN 1977). The use of ionospheric heating with pulsed EM

waves as one of the main techniques for environmental modification is especially

potent in unleashing or amplifying latent or beginning motion, being along earth-

quake lines or within active volcanoes. Such processes, utilizing extreme low fre-

quency – ELF – waves, are capable of penetrating and cutting even through the in-

Claudia von Werlhof

DEP n. 35 / 2017

135

terior of the earth and of causing disturbances at and within its very core, where the

magnetic field of our planet is originating (“Deep Earth Penetrating Tomography”

or “Earth Probing tomography”, Bertell 2013, pp. 285ss).

EM waves of different types can also be used to change the “Jetstream” – fast

winds moving around the globe on the northern and southern hemispheres being a

barrier to temperatures – up north or down south, so that more heat or cold can

stream in. The waves can be used to change the course of the vapor-streams –

clouds that move around the globe – to influence the development of droughts and

floods. They can be used to get more energy than normal transported to certain

places, producing fires, thunderstorms and extreme lightning down to the soil, or

heavy explosions that resemble nuclear ones. They can be used to keep freak

weather conditions on a certain place for a long time. They can be used to move

and build up large storms and to influence ocean currents like El Nino and La Nina

(Bertell 2013, pp. 445ss; 465ss).

The probably largest ionospheric heater, HAARP in Alaska, is able to set 1, 8

GIGA watts – billions of watts - in motion, and bundle them up to focus on one

single point in the ionosphere. The types of technologies existing to destroy the en-

vironment have been explained by geophysicist and presidential consulter Gordon

MacDonald in his article “How to Wreck the Environment”, published in “Unless

Peace Comes” in 1968. That happened 48 years ago! (MacDonald 1968, cf. below)

The prominent journal “The Guardian”, London, has reported about the topic

for example (4.4.2012) in an article titled: “At war over geo engineering”. The arti-

cle reads as follows:

Few in the civil sector fully understand that geo engineering is primarily a military science

and has nothing to do with either cooling the planet or lowering carbon … While seemingly

fantastical, weather has been weaponized. At least four countries – the US, Russia, China and

Israel – possess the technology and organization to regularly alter weather, and geologic

events for various military and black operations […] Indeed, warfare now includes the tech-

nological ability to induce, enhance or direct cyclonic events, earthquakes, draught and flood-

ing, including the use of polymerized aerosol viral agents and radioactive particulates carried

through global weather systems.

The article mentions, as well, the role of a gradual warming of the Polar Re-

gions for resource extraction.

This article entirely validates the statements of Prof. Gordon MacDonald, for-

mer deputy director of the Institute for Geophysics and Physics at the University of

California, and member of the president’s science advisory committee under presi-

dent Lyndon B. Johnson, made in 1968. The globally renowned scientist writes in

Nigel Calder’s book “Unless Peace Comes: A Scientific Forecast of New Weap-

ons”. On geophysical warfare in the chapter “How to Wreck the Environment”, he

describes, how the energy fields of the earth can be used to manipulate the weather,

resulting in a melting of the polar caps, the destruction of the ozone layer, and the

triggering of earthquakes. Prof. Gordon MacDonald therefore established in the

1960ies that these weapons were actually in production and that the whole process

would practically go unnoticed by their victims if potentially utilized

(www.Sauberer-Himmel.de).

Claudia von Werlhof

DEP n. 35 / 2017

136

In fact, there was talk in the US as early as 1958 that “Climate control is

coming!” (Newsweek 1958): Edward Teller, “father” of the hydrogen

bomb, was at the very front regarding the discussion of possible warfare

through the manipulation of weather, for instance dumping aerosols into the

atmosphere (cf. Hamilton in Bertell 2013, p. 498ss).

The UN ENMOD convention of 1976/77 – now 40 years ago – describes

these abominations, and prohibits the military or any other hostile use of

these technologies. In the meantime, they are heard of on a daily basis to-

day: earthquakes, tsunamis, droughts, and floods, change of weather pat-

terns throughout entire regions, ocean currents and tornados, changes of the

ozone layer and the ionosphere (cf. Bertell 2013, p. 46; Storr in Bertell

2013, p. 527).

In the year 1997 the former US secretary of defense, William Cohen, voiced

his concerns about the possibility of precisely these types of weapons being

put to use by terrorists (Bertell 2013, p. 291).

The EU Parliament conducted a hearing in 1999 in the matter of HAARP.

The hearing remained without consequences, despite all the warnings. It,

nevertheless, was admitted by the EU Commission that is has no influence

whatsoever on military affairs! (Werlhof in Bertell 2013, p. 36). HAARP

communications, however, state that “ionospheric heaters” are designed on-

ly for research purposes, and are by no means to be considered as a weap-

ons system. Thus, they would most definitely be in the scope of EU influ-

ence, or would have to be prohibited by the UN!

On the other hand, there is not much talk either about the European iono-

spheric heaters such as EISCAT in Tromsö, northern Norway. This facility

is operated by the German Max-Planck-Institute.

The UN pronounced another Moratorium on Geoengineering at the Biodi-

versity Conference in Nagoya, Japan, in 2010, prohibiting the private and

publicly uncontrolled use of geoengineering (Bertell 2013, p. 318).

In 2013 nearly 50 European activists and several members of the European

Parliament, organized in “Skyguards”, made another intent to mobilize the

EP via a conference “Beyond Theories of Weather Modification - Civil So-

ciety versus Geoengineering”, accompanied by a Petition to the EP that was

even accepted by the EP-Commission on Petitions in 2014 (Werlhof in Ber-

tell 2013, pp. 33-41). In 2016, nevertheless, the same happened to this peti-

tion as to the one of 1999: Ex-MEP Josefina Fraile from Skyguards, who

had organized the Petition, got a letter from the EU-Commission telling her

that military questions are not to be treated in the realm of the EP – though

the petition spoke especially about civil geoengineering.

In general, the Report on “Weather as a Force Multiplier – Owning the

Weather in 2025”, prepared for the US Air Force in 1996, shows that the

question of “weather wars” is in the hands of the military. A civilian and

independent geo-engineering for “saving the world from climate change” is

surely not existing (US Air Force 1996).

Results’ summary:

Claudia von Werlhof

DEP n. 35 / 2017

137

These political experiences seem to contradict the central thesis of Bertell’s

book that the earth has already been transformed into a weapon of war, pointing

against us as well as against itself in a perverse manner! The meaning behind all

this: There is no official recognition of the existence of means and possibilities of

warfare that don’t only pose a threat to all life on earth by utilizing the earth’s own

forces against us and itself, but beyond that the existence of a capacity capable of

destroying the whole planet as such! (Bertell 2013, p. 251f). This danger had been

spelled out already by physicist Nikola Tesla (1856-1943, Bertell 2013, pp. 223ss,

468ss), the original inventor of different ways how to use the electromagnetic pow-

ers of the planet (Bertell 2013, p. 32; 239ss). Using her own forces, the earth can

now be compelled to kill its own beings and then possibly coerced into suicide!

The means to destroy the planet are those of “geoengineering” – including elec-

tromagnetic plasma weapons and all additional forms of weather wars (Bertell

2013, p. 317). If these technologies used in an enhanced form, if the increase of

rhythmically pulsed EM waves and the effect of their resonance becomes practical-

ly unlimited (Tesla’s “Magnifying Transmitter”, and “controlled earthquakes”,

Bertell 2013, p. 288), the earth could possibly even be torn apart, plunge into the

sun, or in last consequence, be hurled out into space! Special “Scalar” EM effects

of resonance could be instantly reflected, when originating from the earth and pen-

etrating space. A result could be the earth’s destruction through the sun, or the dy-

namic balance bet originating from the earth and penetrating space ween the earth

and the moon, sharing the same magnetic field, could fall apart… Nikola Tesla, the

most innovative mind in regard to the work with EM waves, predicted and warned

of all these scenarios as a theoretical possibility at the beginning of the last century

already (Bertell 2013, p. 465ss).

Further developments:

The further development of EM weapons in dimensions of longitudinal

“scalar” waves, as first developed in the Soviet Union, has found particular

focus in the work of former member of the US Army, Tom Bearden, a sci-

entist and disciple of Tesla’s who has been quoted by Bertell (Bertell 2013,

pp. 223ss, 238ss, 465ss; Bearden 1986/2002). This chapter of weapons

technology with (longitudinal) scalar waves appears to be even more myste-

rious than that of other (transversal) EM waves. Considering that in the so-

called vacuum or hyperspace – the “ether” (according to Tesla) or the space

beyond the solar system – the movement of these scalar waves reaches be-

yond the three-dimensional terrestrial space and its conditions, acting inde-

pendently of each of them under at least four – dimensional conditions – the

three dimensions of space and the time dimension. This means for instance

that scalar waves are simultaneous, they don´t need time to spread. Military

application of these processes on earth – that is working with “unlimited”

extra-terrestrial conditions under limited terrestrial ones (cf. first Wagner

1970 on nuclear fission on earth) – would be and actually is the greatest

imminent threat (Bearden 2012; Wood 2010).

Besides the effects triggered on a macro level, other effects that are no less

eerie could be caused by EM waves on the micro level as well. We are talk-

ing about the interference with our brains using ELF waves that correspond

Claudia von Werlhof

DEP n. 35 / 2017

138

to the pulse – the Schumann frequency – of the earth, which is the same as

that of the brain (Begich/ Manning 1996; Bertell 2013, p. 289). These

methods have apparently been developed predominantly by the Soviets, and

can also be applied to larger populations, according to Bearden.

All this happens true to the motto: Electromagnetic pulses can reach anywhere,

due to the fact, that matter itself “oscillates” (Begich/Manning 1996). This is final-

ly the real “secret” of the magnitude and efficiency of the new Tesla-technologies

as patented for their use in ionospheric heaters (official US patents by physicist

Bernard Eastlund, Bertell 2013, p. 277ss) and elsewhere (Bearden 2012; Wood

2010).

The reaction of the public and of social movements

Through Bertell we are now finding out that we, the public, humans, and citi-

zens have been vulnerable to this increasing threat since ca. 70 years without being

made aware of it, let alone having been asked for our approval or “consent”, even

though these developments are life endangering for us and the planet and have

eroded conditions of life globally. Actually, if these threats are not brought to a

halt, our living conditions and the earth itself could be destroyed within a brief pe-

riod of time already. Considering Bertell’s quotes: “The military is always 50 years

ahead”. And: “The military never uses the same weapons in a new war that have

been used in an old one” (Werlhof in Bertell 2013, p. 48; Bertell Interview II,

2014).We, as the allegedly responsible citizens:

1. Although embarrassing, we must now come to grips with the fact that we

have not been aware of anything that has been going on in this field.

2. We need to realize that since the end of the “Cold War” we have allowed

ourselves to believe in the end of wars, at least in the end of large-scale wars, and

in the absence of the threat through another world war, nuclear war, let alone envi-

ronmental wars, wars due to “natural” disasters, energy weapons, and eco terror!

We held and still hold it unthinkable that the earth’s own forces can be used against

us and the earth itself, and we even did not know about these forces at all…!

3. So we have to ask, how and if at all there is still a differentiation between

friend and foe, civilians and the military, conquerors and the conquered. Why has

this distinction evidently become irrelevant? What kind of a war is this?

In respect to social movements, from Bertell’s analysis follows:

A peace movement exists that has not recognized that there is a modern war

that is directed at and against the environment (Bertell 2013, p. 57ss; 325ss;

344ss).

On the grounds of a continuously more obvious destruction of the environ-

ment, there nevertheless exists an ecological movement that has not yet re-

alized the problems which have particularly been caused by the military

(Bertell 2013, p. 71).

The anti- nuclear movement has not realized the post nuclear development

of weapons of mass destruction within the military that supersede the neces-

sity of nuclear wars (Bertell 2013, p. 58).

Claudia von Werlhof

DEP n. 35 / 2017

139

Right now a trend toward the creation of “environmental justice move-

ments” can be observed. These “movements” intend to promote civil “ge-

oengineering” within the fields of civil science, politics, and private indus-

try, by claiming to fight “climate warming”. They are predominately com-

prised of geo-engineers. They claim to be in the position to fight climate

warming without actually confronting the causes! (Hamilton in Bertell

2013, pp. 485ss; Bertell 2013, p. 312ss). The blame for climate warming is

laid down on the doorstep of civilian CO2 emissions, a position that is be-

ing taken only since 1997 (Kyoto protocol, Bertell 2013, p. 311).

According to Bertell, not a single climate conference ever mentioned CO2 be-

fore that! However, the movement of geo-engineers does not focus on the reduc-

tion CO2 emissions at all. On the contrary, this movement assumes that there is no

chance of politically enforcing any considerable norms in this regard anyway. This

“movement” is targeting the alleged symptoms and not the problem of damages of

the earth itself while attracting considerable funding and technical resources (Fraile

2015; Weiss 2014; 2016).

Under the premises of the CO2-thesis, these geo engineers tamper with nothing

less than the planetary dimension of the earth’s elements. With the oceans (“ocean

fertilization”), the layers of the air (aerosols, “Solar Radiation Management”, SRM,

sprayings, Bertell 2013, p. 254; 319), and the ground (deforestation (!), action in

regard to more “albedo”, sun reflecting white spaces and clouds), to screen the

earth against solar heat and/or for more effective CO2 absorption and to eliminate

the necessity of CO2 reduction. Although the dangers resulting from CO2 are sup-

posedly threatening, this approach denies the need to further deal with the issue –

that is how to get rid of it itself! The process of fighting “climate warming”, once

initiated in an engineering context, would need – as is said by geo-engineers – to be

sustained “indefinitely” in order to maintain the climate and not risk an immediate

overheating of the planet under the sweltering heat of a sun allowed to shine in

blue skies. As a matter of fact, a partial warming of the earth is indeed taking place.

However, this is not happening in the troposphere where CO2 actually accumu-

lates, but rather in the higher layers of the stratosphere in which HAARP and simi-

lar facilities – the “ionospheric heaters” – are active! (Phillips 2011).

In total, global warming cannot be a result of CO2 emissions after all! (Bertell

2013, pp. 321-323). CO2 is dirty, but it is not heating up, as she says. Apart from

Bertell hardly anyone has noticed that the environmental crisis in the guise of the

so called “climate crisis”, as well as the alleged solutions for this crisis, namely

geo-engineering, both originate from the same military laboratories!

Ironically, as said in Hamilton’s contribution to Bertell’s book:

The military itself does not assume the existence of any kind of climate crisis at all! The

measures of military geoengineering do not aim at reducing climate warming. These measures

have been invented for completely different reasons, namely military ones: they are geo-

weapons (Bertell 2013, p. 58).

Instead of figuring out how to stop military disruption and manipulation of the

climate through, as Bertell states, “weather wars, plasma weapons, and geo engi-

neering” by, for example, turning off “ionospheric heaters” globally, the discussion

is focused on fighting the consequences of this global war – precisely by employ-

Claudia von Werlhof

DEP n. 35 / 2017

140

ing the same measures that have actually caused them! The fact that it isn’t the al-

leged CO2 issue or even “evil nature” opposing us, remains concealed due to the

creation of deliberate confusion! One of most generous private sponsors of geo en-

gineering, which poses as a civilian measure to counter the consequences of CO2

emissions, while actually being a military scheme towards the planet, is the wealth-

iest man on earth, Bill Gates (Bertell 2013, p. 253f; Hamilton in Bertell 2013, p.

504).

The end of “conspiracy-theory” accusations?

Bertell’s book could be the beginning of an end to insults and suspicions that

have been geared toward making all this sound like a “conspiracy theory” (a term

invented by the CIA to revile those who doubted the official version of the murder

of J.F. Kennedy). Where the corresponding current developments are dragged out

of the dark room of anonymity, secrecy, denial, and concealment – as Bertell has

done – it will not be possible anymore to brush the facts off!

This, nevertheless, is not yet happening, as we know now, five years after hav-

ing published Bertell in German – the first real public appearance of her book after

the sudden bankruptcy of her English publisher in 2000. The background of this

strategy to hide the facts can precisely be seen in the ongoing concealment of the

connections between environmental crisis and military experiments and attacks.

Hiding by all means a meanwhile “unofficial” and/or possibly already raging unde-

clared war, is necessary in order to not risk opposition from civil society, or even

from law, as would inevitably happen if reality were to become publicly evident

(Storr in Bertell 2013, p. 545). MacDonald, who has been mentioned earlier, ex-

plains that such a ‘secret war’ need never be declared or even known by the affect-

ed populations. It could go on for years with only the security forces involved be-

ing aware of it (MacDonald, 1968). This kind of “geo-terrorism” and as such

“technetronic” (Mac Donald) warfare would appear in the guise of militarization or

“weaponization” of “industrial mishaps”, “environmental disasters”, and “geo-

engineering” (Phillips 2011).

Rosalie Bertell states that the military needs us for legitimization since it is in

need of civilian resources (Bertell 2013, p. 388) and legwork, as e.g. done through

scientists, and our belief in its ability to create security in a military sense (Bertell

2013, p. 365) and in case of disaster. To have us assuming that it produces these

disasters itself would of course be a bad fit! The civilian academic field is precisely

one that asserts the impossibility of this type of disaster occurring due to a deliber-

ate manipulation of natural events. All the catastrophes of the past decades, namely

10 times the number of natural disasters as compared to before 1970 (Bertell 2013,

p. 306) and the unending cluster of most severe earthquakes globally, are nothing

but simple natural events for them. We must not forget, that “normal science” is

unable to explain these phenomena, as they have never taken into account what Ni-

kola Tesla had explored and invented. The earth seems to have remained un-

changed tectonically and seismically, and there are no reasonable explanations for

the increase in volcanic activity, for instance.

Claudia von Werlhof

DEP n. 35 / 2017

141

Yet, it is science itself enabling the dangers discussed by Bertell. For without

science the development of the relevant technologies pertaining to our topic would

never have been possible. It is important to bring the invisible doings of a science

serving the military to awareness within the sciences themselves. Civilian science

is going to lose its reputation and credibility in public, when trying to disguise pos-

sible and current mega crimes that would not be possible without its cooperation

with military science in the first place. As Lowell Wood, “civil” geo-engineer and

disciple of Edward Teller put it:

We as humans always influenced our environment the way we wanted it. Why not the Plan-

et?” (Hamilton in Bertell 2013, p. 501).

The overall damages to the planet

Meanwhile, the earth, our planet, is in critical conditions. According to Bertell it

has been weakened and could already have been irreversibly damaged (Bertell

2013, p. 59, 228, 320, 323, 326, 455, 473). The planet has become “a research vic-

tim of militarism” (Bertell 2013, p. 483). It is as if air, water, soil, animals, plants

and humans are presented like a “sacrifice” (Bertell 2013, pp 325ss) to the “Gods”!

Bertell illustrates how the military causes the greatest environmental damages,

usurps most of the resources, and wastes away living conditions on earth by com-

promising it ruthlessly and without conscience (Bertell 2013, pp. 335ss). She draws

parallels between the military and the behavior of an addict. The addict will not re-

frain from his addiction on his own. Obviously, all this goes without the knowledge

or approval of the earth’s population, regardless of our democratic systems and be-

liefs.

Preliminary effects of the new weapons, which have been described here in

part, are:

apart from damages through mining, chemistry, nuclear and genetic engi-

neering, life industries, Nano- technology, and sprayed substances like alu-

minum, barium, sulfur and lithium, that continue to destroy the atmosphere,

the soil, the water, plants, and living conditions;

there are holes in the ozone layer, produced by decades of nuclear testing,

supersonic flights and rocket flights into space (and not by FCKW as we are

constantly told!);

there are disturbances of the earth’s electromagnetic field within its core as

outside in space and in the Van Allen belts;

there are holes and incisions throughout the protective layers of the atmos-

phere, produced by ionospheric heaters;

there is a wobble/an imbalance of the planetary motion (Bertell 2013, p.

450) and a slowing down of the rotation;

there is, therefore, the possible acceleration of a magnetic polar shift/polar

reversal;

there is the active thawing of the arctic region (Bertell 2013, p. 227) since

the 70ies of the 20th century;

causing an increase in ocean levels, a loss of fresh water;

Claudia von Werlhof

DEP n. 35 / 2017

142

and there is a weakening of the gulf stream by 1/3 already, the end of which

would mean a possible new ice age for Europe;

there is the disappearance of the glaciers worldwide that leads to huge

floods now and to extreme droughts later with the effect that the large rivers

of the world would run dry and leave the population and nature without

fresh water;

further, the outer layers of the atmosphere are decreasing by 1 km every 5

years (Bertell 2013, Chapter 3-5 in Part II, additional Texts A, D, C in Part

IV);

this means the loss of protection of the atmosphere against cosmic radiation

like UV, Gamma, microwaves and x rays on the earth’s surface (Bertell

2013, p. 230), detrimental for all life on it and,

if more, finishing with agriculture.

It means weather and climate chaos everywhere and loss of any equilibrium

to be expected.

It means natural catastrophes of any magnitude, and that it will mostly be

impossible to distinguish between natural and manufactured ones, especial-

ly when the tipping point is reached and synergetic effects enter into play.

It means that no catastrophe can be foreseen or protected against. Catastro-

phes can and do happen everywhere and at any moment.

If used for war, these weapons can even lead to a total destruction of the

planet as such, as Tesla warned (Bertell 2013, p. 241).

What are the plans? What is going on currently? How much of the earth´s living

systems have already been destroyed irreversibly? How is the process of destruc-

tion going on already? What means that nature has a time lag of 40-60 years to re-

spond to our manipulations? Does it mean that nothing is going to stop what is only

starting to happen now? What actually do we not know about ongoing experi-

ments? (Bertell 2013, p. 305)

We can anticipate: a boomerang effect, a nemesis – a counter reaction – of na-

ture, synergies/tipping points as well as unpredictable “side effects” that will need

to be taken into consideration (Bertell 2013, p. 256). “How do I repair a system

without understanding it?” This is a question, which geo- engineers pose to them-

selves with regard to the climate. What they omit in the process is the fact that they

are referring to a “system” that has essentially been under attack precisely by them,

and that, too, before they had an understanding of it themselves!

The phenomenon of kyndiagnosia, the incapacity to recognize danger, is omni-

present in science, politics, economy, ecology, society, and particularly in the mili-

tary. All the time over these institutions have been allowed by society to put life to

risk – the life of people, nature and now even the planet – for their destructive ac-

tions and experiments. Never have the principles of war crimes, defined by the

Nürnberg Tribunal after World War II, been applied to them (Bertell 2013, p. 474).

Claudia von Werlhof

DEP n. 35 / 2017

143

The need for more of a theoretical explanation

Since the whole undertaking causes harm to everyone, it becomes unbelievable

and seemingly irrational. An explanation is necessary. Who of us regular human

beings could possibly understand this deliberate promotion of insanity?

Rosalie Bertell is explaining the multiple facts she has gathered about the mili-

tary as an institution that exists for ongoing and planned wars. As it seems clear,

therefore, that the military is specialized in destruction and systems of destruction

of always new kind, there appears to be no necessity for a more thorough explana-

tion. This necessity, however, exists, because the military technologies stem from

the natural sciences, the civil as well as the military ones.

Bertell as a scientist herself, though, has not developed a critique of the sciences

as such, which means of modern science. The analysis of the origins and the devel-

opment of modern science, nevertheless, shows that the military is just the tip of

the iceberg. Beneath its water surface, there is the mountain of a science that has

been invented in modern times. It started with planning subjecting nature in all its

forms, including women as “nature”, destroying and controlling them and nature

alike by means of the “scientific experiment”. The respective technologies were

first developed in the dungeons of the “Holy Inquisition” (Merchant 1982). These

new sciences were not only motivated by a “patriarchal” society that was interested

in new forms of subjecting women, but also in working with and for the military

from their very beginning (Wagner 1970). Today they are now ending up with try-

ing to control Mother Nature, too, as Earth herself, like a sort of “mega witch”, de-

stroying her, the planet, as we now know.

So things have remained the same until today, the only, but important difference

being that the dimensions and the dangers which have multiplied since, as well as

the overall connection between the civil and the military sciences seems to be out-

side of the general knowledge and consciousness. When looking at the destruction

of nature and life that takes place everywhere, and can surely not be denied any

more, occurring even without any direct war, we then can realize what it means

that the sciences are related to the military even where they declare to be “civil”

and “peaceful”. This way the whole of the scientific undertaking in reality is a war

against life, the military being only its peak. This is exactly what we now are expe-

riencing full size.

So, we now have to answer the question why and how this has happened and is

even promoted by the Society, using all possible means, as we have seen. From the

point of view of my approach of the “critical theory of patriarchy”, the military has

invented something like a “military alchemy”, an expression that Rosalie Bertell

liked very much when she knew about it. (She even wanted a new edition of her

book be entitled this way). It means that the patriarchal, women and nature hating -

dimension of modern civilization (Werlhof 2016b) goes back to antiquity, where

the science and technique of a patriarchal “alchemy” were developed. Their aim at

that time already was to start to take control over women, mothers and Mother Na-

ture in order to transform them into a supposedly higher and better life and matter,

namely a motherless life and artificial gold (Schütt 2000; Werlhof 2011). They

failed in doing so and did not succeed. With the invention of modern science and

Claudia von Werlhof

DEP n. 35 / 2017

144

technology, nevertheless, the modern “alchemists” started with the same project

again, being much more successful than at any time before in history. The results

can be admired today: the machine, the commodity, money and “capital” in general

being the alchemical wonders of modernity which are thought to replace life, na-

ture and “matter” by something more civilized, more developed and more divine!

From nuclear, genetic and nanotechnology to geoengineering, from micro- to

macro-life, this has been the path of modern alchemy, the military alchemy of ge-

oengineering being its last invention, as I see it (Werlhof 2011, 2014, 2015).

The “Anthropocene” (Crutzen et.al. 2007) is the result, the earth-era of man-

kind, to truly be God! This is “proved”:

by transforming – “hacking” – the planet into a manageable instrument, as

if this would be desirable and possible without damaging it;

by reversing the vibrant planet into a “better” one, a predictable giant ma-

chine, a Mega-Machine, and a war-machine!

by means of intended ultimate control over all of life’s processes, the ones

of the planet as a whole included;

and, finally, through a “taming” of Mother Earth as a sort of dangerous and

life threatening “mega witch”! (“Dr. Strangelove” in Hamilton 2013, p.

498ss).

There are people at work who are not kidding at all, but risk the last and greatest

matricide, that of the earth herself. These people are “allowed” to do so! The ne-

cessity to demand an end to such a dangerous undertaking and hubris has not been

acknowledged, and such undertaking has not been forbidden! It is obviously be-

lieved that all this is a desirable “progress” and “development” and really worth

striving for. So, as an endeavor it takes on a truly religious dimension. We can see

this way, how historically old this kind of “wishful thinking” and hubris is already.

A failure seems inconceivable for the perpetrators, and such a thing does not even

exist in their minds.

This development has endured for 500 years – rooted in a 5000 years old bellig-

erent-religious-ideological beginning. It comes to a climax and to an end now: We

are talking about “patriarchal” thinking and the development of a global “alchemi-

cal system” based on the utopian project of the destruction and technical substitu-

tion of a motherly nature, a process that appears to have become the “collective un-

conscious” of today’s civilization. (Werlhof 2010, 2014a, 2015, 2016b; Pro-

jektgruppe 2011).

Bertell says about the dangers and the secrecy around military activities:

Until now, nobody has clearly considered the potential consequences, described them or ad-

mitted to them (Bertell 2013, p. 473).

What we will hear in the end might be no different from what the nuclear indus-

try, which in fact remains uninsured against failure, has to say, namely that they

assumed that the “worst case” scenario would never actually take place.

Bertell was still somehow optimistic in the year 2000. She was confident in

grass roots movements throughout the world and their ability to join forces with

international organizations like the UN in order to disempower the military, even

abolish war (Bertell 2013, p. 376), and to find a path towards a peaceful and friend-

Claudia von Werlhof

DEP n. 35 / 2017

145

ly future shaped by respect towards the earth and the maintenance of “ecological

safety”.

Today, 16 years later, the ongoing crisis points towards a completely different

development, if not to a new world war (Chossudovsky 2012 and 2015) which

seem to have begun already. The public, most of civil science, social movements

and most politicians, though, have not yet understood how the new weaponry of

weather wars, plasma weapons and geoengineering is functioning. They lack any

understanding why it should be possible to produce earthquakes, volcanic erup-

tions, storms, droughts, floods, changing ocean currents, tsunamis, influencing the

weather of whole regions, heat and cold, freak conditions beyond the seasons or the

climate zones – all mentioned in the UN ENMOD Convention in 1977 already.

The reason is that these effects are mainly due to “Tesla technologies”, based on

the manipulation of the electromagnetic potential of the earth. The physicist and

inventor Nikola Tesla (1856-1943) has never been publicly recognized by the civil

sciences, even if without him there would be no alternating current, no electronic

device, and no wireless communication. Tesla’s idea of treating the phenomena of

life via its “waves” instead of via its “particles”, taking influence on its movements

instead of on solid matter, as was usual in modern science, led to inventions of a

character and magnitude that could neither have been produced nor explained by

“normal” physics. Tesla’s inventions (Tesla 1919) were secretly taken over by the

military in the East and the West at the end of World War II, and were never dis-

cussed in public. Less was it recognized how Tesla’s inventions were related to

Quantum physics, another part of the new physics of the last century, leading to

even more terrible weapons, as explained by Bearden, a disciple of Tesla, and Ber-

tell (Bearden 1986; Bertell 2013, pp. 237, 239, 243, 251, 454, 468ss).

Unfortunately – says Bertell – waiting for these weapons to be employed in order to then be

able to better understand them will mean the end of our civilization and our life. Our research

must be ahead of the threats instead of limping behind. Chemtrails are the attempt of biologi-

cal and chemical warfare. What they are dumping on us now might only be a pre-taste of what

is actually planned (Bertell, email 27.01.2011).

What about the legal situation?

No laws exist that prohibit the tampering with the earth’s climate (Hamilton in

Bertell 2913, p. 502). Bertell’s stance on this issue:

If the military is tampering with our air, our water, the ground and the forces of our earth, or

doing anything that questions our living conditions, let alone has the potential to destroy

them, then that simply must not happen! First and foremost this needs to be discussed public-

ly…Beyond all secrecy we must have a right to that!

Environmental advocate Dominik Storr:

The fact that geophysical warfare against mother earth has no legal repercussions is, however,

also a symptom of complete political failure. Politically it has not been possible to generate

any binding legal norms concerning limitations, let alone a ban on climate and weather mode-

rating measures (Storr in Bertell 2013, p. 528).

Claudia von Werlhof

DEP n. 35 / 2017

146

For, these remain concealed, and are regarded as inexistent, though the laws

concerning human rights in general are sufficient to ban climate and geoengineer-

ing, once investigated and proved their necessarily detrimental effects on the health

of people as well as of the environment as such. The UN-ENMOD Convention is

prohibiting the hostile use of techniques that are altering the environment. This

Convention can, therefore, not been taken for legal activities as far as a “scientific

and peaceful” use of these techniques is propagated, as civil geoengineering is pro-

posing it. So, the military use of it has to be kept secret (Storr in Bertell 2013, p.

526, 530ss, 534ss).

None of the UN-Conferences has brought to the table a discussion about the

military behavior, so Bertell, even though the UN has been well aware of the exist-

ence of weather modification for wars since 36 years and has actually banned this,

the topic was not even raised at the conference in Copenhagen 2009, at which cli-

mate was the central topic. Nor has this been the case in the COP21 UN-

Conference in the same issue in Paris in 2015.

Instead, however, the UN enforced a global Moratorium against geo engineer-

ing in Nagoya 2010, prohibiting individual, therefore private action. Who cares? At

the Stock Exchange, you can gain money with “weather derivates”.

What can we do?

It is our objective to rouse the public, the media, movements, science, politics,

the EU, and above all, the people, especially the youth.

The official theories about global warming and the alleged reasons for it, name-

ly the civil output of CO2 gases, as recently maintained again at the last UN Cli-

mate Conference COP21 in Paris (2015), have to be dismantled (Bertell 2013, pp.

300ss). The IPCC – the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – as the main

official institution propagating the theory about the importance of CO2, is based on

mere computer simulation and has no real proves to offer (Storr in Bertell 2013, p.

533). Most scientists even have severe doubts about the CO2 thesis (Weiss 2016;

Wigington 2016). The results of independent scientists like Marvin Herndon are

not published (a.a.O.). Investigations like those of activist Dane Wigington are not

valued (Wigington 2016), even if he is quoting official sources like a recent speech

of CIA-Director Brennan on geo-engineering and some of its methods. Civil geo-

engineers, on the other hand, are denying the actual use of these methods, pretend-

ing that they are only on the table of discussion for an eventual future use (Fraile

2015, Weiss 2014, 2016). This way they avoid any legal problem, any problem

with civil society and any proximity to the military. For, if climate change is the

result of the application of military geo-engineering, there is no way to propagate it

against climate change!

Rosalie Bertell is an eye-opener! She leads us into 7 decades of manipulation

and destruction of the earth´s systems, and shows how complicated the reality has

become in the meantime, as synergetic effects may have been influential on the one

hand, whereas the results of scientific research about them are lacking in public on

the other hand.

Claudia von Werlhof

DEP n. 35 / 2017

147

She shows us that and why a new dimension never considered until now has to

be recognized – the planetary one. At the same time, she demonstrates that this

planet is a gigantic, but friendly and beautiful cosmic being that wants to maintain

the abundance of life it has created over billions of years – us included! Rosalie

Bertell is able to see the new dimensions of incredible dangers that are threatening

us, to analyze them soberly, and to call for our love for Mother Earth as a mental

and spiritual way to move on at the same time. It is an invitation to not give up, not

to hide, and not to go into despair, but to start to open up, to join, to get organized

and to stand up for this Earth as it is the only one we have. I call it her “planetary

consciousness” (Werlhof 2014b), a consciousness for this wonderful planet that has

to be loved and protected by us. What else?

Rosalie has called herself an ecofeminist. Isn´t her consciousness and love of

Mother Earth exactly what ecofeminism needs today in order to be at the level of a

reality that has entered a new dimension, one that has never existed on earth be-

fore? The key is, therefore, to wake up to this planetary consciousness before and

not after an electromagnetic geophysical war. A new movement will be needed to

get to it and a broader theory to understand it.

Bertell’s book is a global warning for all of us.

References

Altnickel, Werner. 2011. Kerner und Greenpeace: Über Chemtrails, Mas-

senmord und HAARProben. Ein Interview mit Chemtrail-Kritiker Werner Altnickel,

in Kopp Nachrichten, interview November 18, https://www.weather-modification-

journal.de/kerner-und-greenpeace-über-chemtrails-massenmord-und-haarproben/

Bearden, Thomas E. 1986/2002. Fer de Lance. Briefing on Soviet Scalar Elec-

tromagnetic Weapons. Santa Barbara: Cheniere Press.

Bearden, Thomas E. 2012. Skalar Technologie. Peiting: Michaelsverlag (Engl.

Gravitobiology)

Begich, Nick, Jeanne Manning. 1996. Löcher im Himmel. Peiting: Michaelsver-

lag.

Begich, Nick, Jeanne Manning. 1995/2002. Angels Don’t Play this HAARP:

Advances in Tesla-Technology. Anchorage: Earthpulse Press.

Bertell, Rosalie. 1985. No Immediate Danger? Prognosis for a Radioactive

Earth, London/Toronto. London: The Women’s Press.

Bertell, Rosalie. 2000. Planet Earth. The Latest Weapon of War. London: The

Women’s Press.

Bertell, Rosalie. 2011 (2nd ed. Birstein 2013, 3rd ed. 2016). Kriegswaffe Planet

Erde. Gelnhausen: J.K. Fischer Verlag.

Bertell, Rosalie. 2013b. “Interview: Are we the Last Generations? Radioactivity

as progressive extinction of life.” 8th Information-Letter, www.pbme-online.org.

Claudia von Werlhof

DEP n. 35 / 2017

148

Bertell, Rosalie. 2014. “Interview: Planet Without A Future? New Weapons

through the Destruction of Mother Earth 2010.” 9th Information-Letter,

www.pbme-online.org.

Carson, Rachel. 1962. Silent Spring. Boston-New York: Mifflin.

Chossudovsky, Michel. 2012. Towards a World War III Scenario. Ottawa:

Global Research.

Chossudovsky, Michel. 2015. The Globalization of War. America’s “Long

War” against Humanity. Ottawa: Global Research.

Climate

Control

Coming,

April

1958

http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2012/01/12/climate-control-is-

coing/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+

ModernMechanix+%28Modern+Mechanix%29.

Crutzen, Paul J., W. Steffen and J.R. McNeill. 2007. “The Anthropocene: Are

Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature?” Ambio (36): 614-621.

Dahl, Jürgen. 1994. Die Verwegenheit der Ahnungslosen. Über Gentechnik,

Chemie und andere Schwarze Löcher des Fortschritts, 2. ed., Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

ETC

Group.

2010.

“The

Big

Downturn?”

Nanogeopolitics,

www.etcgroup.org/sites/all/modules/civicrm/extern/url.php?u=129&qid=S7135

Fraile, Josefina. 2015. “Climate Engineers in Berlin. Coup d’Etat against global

democracy-Summarized report of a critical environmental activist.” 11th Info Let-

ter, www.pbme-online.org

Hamilton, Clive. 2013. “Die Rückkehr des Dr. Strangelove – Die Politik der

Klimamanipulation als Antwort auf die globale Erwärmung,” in Rosalie Bertell,

Kriegswaffe Planet Erde, pp. 485-507.

House, Tamzy J. et al. 1996. U.S. Air Force, Weather as a Force Multiplier:

Owning the Weather in 2025, http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf

Information-Letters of the Planetary Movement for Mother Earth, www.pbme-

online.org

Kaku, Michio. 2011. Quoted in Bob Nichols, Fukushima: How Many Cherno-

byls Is It? (https://www.veteranstodayarchives.com/2011/05/28/fukushima-how-

many-chernobyls-is-it/), 4. Info-Letter PMME.

Letters. 2012. “At war over geoengineering.” The Guardian online, February 9.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/09/at-war-over-

geoengineering

MacDonald, Gordon. 1968. “How to Wreck the Environment,” in Nigel Calder

(ed.), A Scientific Forecast of New Weapons, Unless Peace Comes. London: Peli-

can, pp. 119-213.

Merchant, Carolyn. 1982. The Death of Nature. Women, Ecology and the Scien-

tific Revolution. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

Moret, Leuren. 2011b. “Der tektonische Nuklearkrieg wird von den weltweiten

HAARP-Partnern beobachtet,” http://www.politaia.org/?p=6623

Claudia von Werlhof

DEP n. 35 / 2017

149

Moret, Leuren. 2011a. “Erdbeben in Japan und Atomunfälle sind Folgen eines

tektonischen Nuklearkrieges,” http://www.chemtrail.de/?p=1250

Moret, Leuren. 2011d. “Japan, U.S., Kanada vertuschen Fukushima-

Strahlungsdesaster,” http://www.politaia.org/?p=7882

Moret, Leuren. 2011c. “Mega-Tsunami, totale Kernschmelze und Strahlen-

krankheiten”. www.politaia.org/israel/leuren-moret-am-14-06-2011.

Morpheus. 2010. Transformation der Erde. Interkosmische Einflüsse auf das

Bewusstsein. Berlin-München: Trinity Verlag.

MUOS. 2015. “U.S. Navy Launches 4th MUPÒS Telecom Satellite.” Space-

news, September 3.

Phillips, Jeff. 2011. “Geo-Terrorism: The Weaponization of ‘Industrial Acci-

dents’, Natural Disasters’ and ‘Environmental Engineering’,” http://geo-

terrorism.blogspot.it/2011/03/geo-terrorism-and-technetronic-warfare.html

Ponte, Lowell. 1976. The Cooling. Has the next ice age already begun? Can we

survive it?, Englewood Cliffs (N.J.): Prentice Hall.

Projektgruppe “Zivilisationspolitik” (Hrsg.). 2011. Kann es eine ‘neue Erde’

geben? Zur Kritischen Patriarchtstheorie und der Praxis einer postpatriarchalen

Zivilisation. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang Verlag.

Schütt, Werner. 2000. Auf der Suche nach dem Stein der Weisen. Die Geschich-

te der Alchemie. München: CH. Beck.

Siegwart-Horst, Günther. 2000. Uran-Geschosse: Schwergeschädigte Soldaten,

mißgebildete Neugeborene, sterbende Kinder, 2. Ed. Freiburg (Breisgau): Ahri-

man.

Smith, Jerry E. 2006. Weather Warfare-the Military’s Plan to Draft Mother Na-

ture. Kempton: Adventure Unlimited Press.

Storr, Dominik. 2013. “Eine juristische Betrachtung von Rechtsanwalt Domini

Storr,” in Rosalie Bertell. Kriegswaffe Planet Erde: 525-546.

Tesla, Nikola. 1919. “My Inventions V-the Magnifying Transmitter.” The Elec-

trical Experimenter (June): 112-113, 148, 173, 176ss.

UN. 1977. “Convention on the Prohibition of Military and any other Hostile

Use of Environmental Modification Techniques (Environmental Modification

Convention).” Geneva, May 18.

Wagner, Friedrich. 1970. Weg und Abweg der Naturwissenschaft. Stuttgart:

Klett-Cotta.

Weiss, Mathias. 2014. “Capturing the atmosphere of the CEC 2014 – Climate

Engineering Conference.” 10th Info-Letter, www.pbme-online.org

Weiss, Mathias. 2016. “Zur Geschichte des Geo-Engineering, Postscript,” in

Bertell Rosalie (ed.), Kriegswaffe Planet Erde, 3rd ed., Gelnhausen-Roth: Fischer

Verlag.

Werlhof, Claudia von. 2010. West-End. Das Scheitern der Moderne als

“kapitalistisches Patriarchat” und die Logik der Alternativen. Köln: PapyRossa.

Claudia von Werlhof

DEP n. 35 / 2017

150

Werlhof, Claudia von. 2011. The Failure of Modern Civilization and the Strug-

gle for a “Deep” Alternative. On “Critical Theory of Patriarchy” as a New Para-

digm. Frankfurt a. M.-New York: Peter Lang.

Werlhof, Claudia von. 2013. Mit Bertell gegen Geoengineering: Debatte im Eu-

ropaparlament 2013, in Rosalie Bertell, Kriegswaffe Planet Erde, pp. 33-41.

Werlhof, Claudia von. 2014b. Nell’Età del Boomerang. Contributi alla teoria

critica del patriarcato. Milano: Unicopli.

Werlhof Claudia von. 2014. “‘Planetary Consciousness’-What is that?” Return

to Mago, July-August.

Werlhof, Claudia von. 2015. Madre Tierra o Muerte! Reflexiones para una

Teoría Crítica del Patriarcado. Oaxaca: El Rebozo.

Werlhof, Claudia von. 2016. “La destrucción de la Madre Tierra como último y

máximo

crimen

civilización

patriarcal.”

DEP

30:

259-281,

http://www.unive.it/media/allegato/dep/n30-2016/22_Werlhof.pdf

Werlhof, Claudia von. 2016b. “The “Hatred of Life”: The World System which

Threatening

All

Us.”

Global

Research,

August

16,

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-hatred-of-life-the-world-system-which-

isthreatening-all-of-us/5541269

Werlhof, Claudia von. 2016c. “Geoengineering and Planetary Movement for

Mother Earth.” CWS – Canadian Womens’ Studies Journal, 31, 1-2, 2014

http://cws.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/cws/article/view/37534/34079)

Wigington, Dane. 2016, Scientists Surveyed Unanimously Refuse To Deny Cli-

mate

Engineering

Reality.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/scientists-

surveyed-unanimously-refuseto-deny-climate-engineering-reality/

Wood, Judy. 2014. Where Did the Towers Go? The Evidence of Directed Free-

Energy Technology on 9/11, (Web, 2010). Port Townsend: Feral House.

Webliography