document.no - By: Christian Skaug - June 29, 2022

When the herpes virus began to ravage Europe in the first half of 2020, there was one statistic that more than anyone else showed was the seriousness of death, more specifically the weekly death toll from the EU statistical office Eurostat.

By the middle of the year, 160,000 more people had died around Europe than expected:

Source and graphics: Eurostat.

Eurostat also demonstrated significant excess mortality on a European scale during later waves of infection.

However, the deviations from normal mortality showed large differences between the individual European countries, and in the case of Norway we had a rather striking absence of excess mortality in 2020, as shown, for example, by figures taken from Table 12954 in Statistics Norway's statistics bank:

Source: Statistics Norway. Graphics: Document.

The weekly death rates during the first year of the epidemic in our country were, as we can hardly see, different from the figures for the five years before, which all follow the known seasonal pattern of mortality, ie somewhat higher in winter and somewhat lower in summer.

From a public health perspective, the death toll as a result of the laboratory-created Chinese pneumonic plague in itself did not give cause for concern in Norway. If anything, 2020 had slight mortality.

In 2021, however, the situation began to look quite different. If one takes the average of the five deaths of the previous five years as a basis, the deviation from normal mortality showed an increasing trend through most of last year:

Source: Statistics Norway. Graphics: Document.

At the end of last year, Document, therefore, contacted the Section for Population Statistics at Statistics Norway to request an explanation of the phenomenon. This stated that the excess mortality in the second half of 2021 was probably a kind of correction for lower mortality from the second quarter of 2020, which was assumed to be due to closure and other infection control measures.

Given that excess mortality seemed to fall towards the end of 2021, the explanation seemed plausible. When we checked the weekly death rates again this spring, however, it turned out that there had been a new wave of excess mortality in the first half of 2022:

Source: Statistics Norway. Graphics: Document.

Here, it could hardly be more about correcting for postponed mortality in 2020.

A new inquiry to Statistics Norway is fruitless as far as reliable answers are concerned. It is suggested that the country generally has higher death rates in-store because more and more of the many post-war children are dying. But the figures that allow one to examine this further on a weekly basis are not public. They must be ordered, it is not certain that they can be delivered at all, in which case it takes several weeks, and it will presumably cost 10-15,000 kroner.

Shortly afterward, we receive a tip from a Norwegian physicist, who invites us to examine the death rates in light of the vaccine numbers. The National Institute of Public Health (NIPH) has published weekly figures for set vaccine doses since vaccination began towards the end of 2020. It is only at the turn of the year that the cases pick up speed:

Source: FHI. Graphics: Document.

What strikes one here is how the vaccine rate and excess mortality seem to follow each other every few weeks. Both curves go through four qualitatively fairly consistent phases: slow ascent, steep ascent, a new ascent to a somewhat lower level, and new ascent.

If you do a slightly rough analysis by scaling the vaccination curve, shifting it by fifteen weeks, and putting it in the same diagram as the curve of deviations from normal mortality, this picture appears

Graphics: Document.

It is hard to believe that it is due to coincidences when the two curves follow each other so closely. And then one has to raise the "forbidden" hypothesis: Could the excess mortality in 2021 and 2022 be due to the vaccination?

This time, Statistics Norway does not want to answer. They refer us directly to FHI, which we contact on 16 June with the question: Can there be a causal connection between the number of vaccine doses the population has taken and the excess mortality in the population?

We reserve the right that the coincidence may be a spurious connection and ask FHI which factor we may have overlooked.

FHI does not really give an answer but refers us to an announcement dated June 9 with the title Cardiovascular diseases contributed to increased mortality in 2021.

Here the unusually high mortality is confirmed:

In 2021, 41,676 deaths were registered among people living in Norway. This is the highest number of deaths since 2008, and the largest percentage increase in the age-standardized mortality rate since 1999. The increase corresponds to 1000–1500 more deaths in Norway in 2021 than expected, based on the development / trend in the last ten years before the pandemic.

And the direct reason is, as the title proclaims, that "covid-19 and more deaths from cardiovascular disease than expected contributed to higher overall mortality in Norway in 2021". FHI uses the term "surprising" about the many deaths due to cardiovascular disease.

But why does covid-19 mortality increase after vaccination has begun in full?

And what could be the cause of increased cardiovascular disease? It should never have anything to do with the vaccine, given that there is no recognized medical literature that shows a connection between vaccination and heart problems?

Nature Communications June 25, 2022: mRNA vaccines increase the risk of myocarditis, according to a comprehensive French study. The example is not unique.

FHI itself suggests that pandemic measures may have played a role:

- What could be the reason for cardiovascular disease increasing in the second pandemic year?

- The mortality figures in themselves can not give an answer to this. We cannot rule out that coronary heart disease or that unintended negative effects of pandemic measures may have contributed to increased mortality from ischemic heart disease such as myocardial infarction.

The National Institute of Public Health goes so far as to acknowledge that someone may have actually died from the vaccines:

- It is deeply tragic that the coronary vaccines may have contributed to death, since the goal of vaccination is to protect against serious illness and death.

FHI suggests that there are several dozen deaths. We are otherwise referred to a Norwegian study that took place between 27 December 2020 and 1 March 2021, where no increased mortality was detected among vaccinated people in the short run.

But the excess mortality in 2021 is thus more than one thousand, so how can it be ruled out that the vaccination has contributed to more deadly cardiovascular disease? We again ask FHI to take a position on such a possible causal connection, since the question remains unanswered after the first response, but we do not hear anything more.

This means that FHI has not really denied that the vaccination may have led to increased mortality, but it is obvious that the desire to think highly of the case is quite absent there in the house. The answers from there are not even signed either but is communicated from anonymous professionals via an equally anonymous media watch.

You do not see anything other than what you want to see, but if you first see this way, the question is inevitable: Are we absolutely sure that these injections have saved more lives in Norway than they have taken?

There was an unexpected 40% increase in ‘all-cause deaths’ in 2021

Kusi - Posted: February 2, 2022

SAN DIEGO (KUSI) – Several US life insurance companies have recently revealed an overwhelming unexplained increase (40%) in “all-cause deaths” amongst 18 to 49-year-olds.

Three physicians “whistle-blowers” have just released real data from the DoD, drawn from the clinical diagnosis codes. The increases found are from 2021, compared to the five-year average from 2016 to 2020.

KUSI Newsroom - Play Video

Myocardial infarction: 269% increase
> Miscarriages: 300% increase
> Bell’s palsy: 291% increase
> Congenital malformations: 156% increase
> Female infertility: 471% increase
> Pulmonary embolisms: 467% increase
> Neurologic abnormalities: 300% increase
> Cancers: 300% increase

As of now, the CDC has not explained this data.

Dr. Kelly Victory discussed the surprising findings and respond to those who believe the COVID-19 vaccines have caused these increases.

Commentary:

HUMAN SYNTHESIS

COPYRIGHTS

Copy & Paste the link above for Yandex translation to Norwegian.

WHO and WHAT is behind it all? : >

The bottom line is for the people to regain their original, moral principles, which have intentionally been watered out over the past generations by our press, TV, and other media owned by the Illuminati/Bilderberger Group, corrupting our morals by making misbehavior acceptable to our society. Only in this way shall we conquer this oncoming wave of evil.

All articles contained in Human-Synthesis are freely available and collected from the Internet. The interpretation of the contents is left to the readers and does not necessarily represent the views of the Administrator. Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of the sole responsibility of the author(s). Human-Synthesis will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. Human-Synthesis grants permission to cross-post original Human-Synthesis articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified.

HUMAN SYNTHESIS