A serviceman of the Lugansk People's Republic militia pushes a bicycle past burning stalls at a market in the town of Popasnaya.Alexander Reka / TASS

The Moscow Times - By James Beardsworth - 12 May 11:10 2022

When Russia invaded neighboring Ukraine in February, Russian general Yakov Rezantsev apparently told his troops that they would not be at war for long.

“This operation is going to be over in mere hours,” Rezantsev said, according to an intercepted conversation released by the Ukrainian security services. The Moscow Times was unable to verify the recording.

More than two months later, Russian troops have made only limited gains in Ukraine and are bogged down in brutal fighting, inching forward in some places and losing territory in others. With Russia’s losses of men and materiel rising rapidly, predictions of a long and bloody military stalemate are becoming increasingly common.

Rezantsev himself was killed in March in a Ukrainian airstrike near the Russian-occupied city of Kherson in southern Ukraine, according to the BBC.

Despite the expectation that the symbolic date of May 9, when Russia marks the Soviet Union’s victory over Nazi Germany, would see President Vladimir Putin announce a change of tack in Ukraine, it passed without a public change in Moscow’s approach.


					General Yakov Rezantsev.					 					Press Service of the 49th Combined Army
General Yakov Rezantsev.Press Service of the 49th Combined Army

"We assess President Putin is preparing for a prolonged conflict in Ukraine," U.S. Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines told a U.S. Senate hearing Tuesday.

The Russian advance has been “slow and difficult,” said Tracey German, a security expert at King's College London, and they have failed to capture strategic towns in eastern Ukraine including Slovyansk and Kramatorsk. Russian forces have lost “a lot of manpower and equipment, and are struggling to replace such losses,” German added.

Even modest gains made recently by Russia have come at the cost of losing control over other areas, in particular near the northeastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv.

“[They] have to make trade-offs,” said Dmitry Gorenburg, an expert on Russian security at the Virginia-based CNA think tank. “The price for making gains in one place is that the Russians have to move forces out of another area, and then Ukraine can take back territory.”

The situation increasingly resembles a “stalemate” in which, despite fierce fighting, neither side is making significant territorial gains or losses, according to Gorenburg.


					A view of the Azovstal iron and steel plant in the port city of Mariupol. 					 					Peter Kovalev / TASS
A view of the Azovstal iron and steel plant in the port city of Mariupol.Peter Kovalev / TASS

U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milley predicted last month that a protracted war in eastern Ukraine could go on “for years.”

In a long war, supplies of men and equipment become key.

Insufficient manpower is a growing problem for the Russian army as it seeks to push forward across a front over 500 kilometers long.

Moscow’s apparent plan to carry out a giant pincer movement — with troops pushing south from the northeastern Ukrainian town of Izyum and north from the areas around the port city of Mariupol — now appears increasingly impossible to achieve, analysts said.

“When you look at the size of their frontage, the breadth is proving a problem,” said Nick Reynolds, a land warfare expert at the London-based Royal United Services Institute.

Estimates of the number of Russian casualties differ. British intelligence has put the death toll at 15,000 troops, while the Ukrainian Defense Ministry claims the figure is as high as 26,000. Officially, Russia has admitted to just 1,351 soldiers killed in action.

Despite speculation Putin was preparing to declare a nationwide mobilization to help provide the manpower to allow the army to push westward, no such announcement was made.


					A tank belonging to Russian forces is seen in the port city of Mariupol. 					 					Peter Kovalev / TASS
A tank belonging to Russian forces is seen in the port city of Mariupol. Peter Kovalev / TASS

Analysts say the Kremlin likely decided against mobilization because of the potential for even higher casualty rates among recruits struggling to use complex weaponry.

“To mobilize untrained soldiers is to produce corpses,” said Andrei Kolesnikov, an expert on Russian politics at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

As well as manpower attrition, large amounts of Russian military equipment have also been destroyed in the course of 11 weeks of fighting.

Russia has lost 3,590 military vehicles, 124 aircraft, and 9 naval vessels since the beginning of the war, according to Oryx, an intelligence blog that documents Russia's military losses.

Stocks of long-range missiles are also reportedly running low. Replacing them, particularly under Western sanctions, is likely to be time-consuming.

“If the Russians are to make any serious advances from now on, they will have to be slow, methodical operations with a significant investment in resources and manpower,” said Reynolds.


					President Vladimir Putin with Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu and the Chief of General Staff of the Armed Forces Valery Gerasimov.					 					kremlin.ru
President Vladimir Putin with Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu and the Chief of General Staff of the Armed Forces Valery Gerasimov.kremlin.ru

However Russia chooses to continue its offensive, it is also being met by stiffening resistance from a Ukrainian army increasingly well-equipped with Western weaponry.

Politically, Ukraine also appears less willing to seek de-escalation with Moscow.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has said that Russian forces pulling back to their pre-Feb. 24 positions would be a minimum requirement for any peace settlement.

All these factors are reducing Russia’s options on the battlefield, according to Gorenburg, and make the chance of a drawn-out military conflict much higher.

Instead, Russia may resort to trying to strangle Ukraine economically, enforcing a Black Sea blockade and stopping goods from moving in and out of Ukraine’s major ports.

“This may not be the war they want to fight, but it might be the only war they can fight,” Gorenburg said.

James Beardsworth j.beardsworth@themoscowtimes.com


COPYRIGHTS

Copy & Paste the link above for Yandex translation to Norwegian.

WHO and WHAT is behind it all ? : >

The bottom line is for the people to regain their original, moral principles, which have intentionally been watered out over the past generations by our press, TV, and other media owned by the Illuminati/Bilderberger Group, corrupting our morals by making misbehavior acceptable to our society. Only in this way shall we conquer this oncoming wave of evil.

Commentary:

Administrator

HUMAN SYNTHESIS

All articles contained in Human-Synthesis are freely available and collected from the Internet. The interpretation of the contents is left to the readers and do not necessarily represent the views of the Administrator. Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). Human-Synthesis will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. Human-Synthesis grants permission to cross-post original Human-Synthesis articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified