4 min read

The FBI keeps hundreds of thousands of Jan. 6 documents from defenders

FILE - Violent protesters, loyal to President Donald Trump, storm the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, in Washington. The platform Gab launched in 2016 and now claims to have 15 million monthly visitors, though that number could not be independently verified. The service says it saw a huge jump in signups following the January 6 riot, which prompted Facebook, Twitter and YouTube to crack down on Trump and others who they said had incited violence. (AP Photo/John Minchillo, File)

Document - By: Hans Rustad - April 13, 2022, 11:46 AM

The FBI still keeps hundreds of thousands of January 6 documents hidden from defenders, even as trials roll. That's what America's best journalist on January 6, Julie Kelly, told Steve Bannon's War-room.

The treatment of the 6 January prisoners is a legal-political scandal.

Julie Kelly:(FBI) agents were deployed to Capitol grounds EARLY on January 6th. Well, what were they doing Steve? I’ve seen all sorts of videos and photographs from January 6th. I don’t see people walking around in big FBI jackets! I don’t see any FBI agents trying to stop the crowd. We still can’t get Jill Sanborn, the head of Counter-Terror at the FBI who was asked under oath if FBI agents or informants incited or were involved in any violence on January 6. She couldn’t answer the question. And we still have no clarification four months later after her testimony. And furthermore, Steve, I’ll say this in conclusion, the FBI still has not uploaded hundreds of thousands of pages of FBI records related to January 6th. Still have not uploaded it to a sharable platform so defense attorneys who are defending January 6 platforms can have access to these records.

The media is conducting propaganda for the January 6 committee in Congress, which is conducting a spectacle process. They do not have legal powers, but act as if they have, and the media pretend that the summons has the force of law. They do not have that. They can be safely overlooked by those who are summoned.

Reuters issued a sensational report on August 20 last year: Four senior officials said there were no signs of a conspiracy to storm Congress. It was something that happened spontaneously.

WASHINGTON, Aug 20 (Reuters) – The FBI has found scant evidence that the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol was the result of an organized plot to overturn the presidential election result, according to four current and former law enforcement officials.

Though federal officials have arrested more than 570 alleged participants, the FBI at this point believes the violence was not centrally coordinated by far-right groups or prominent supporters of then-President Donald Trump, according to the sources, who have been either directly involved in or briefed regularly on the wide-ranging investigations.

The January 6 committee tries to stick Trump to the riots, but the officials explicitly distance themselves from it.

«Ninety to ninety-five percent of these are one-off cases,» said a former senior law enforcement official with knowledge of the investigation. «Then you have five percent, maybe, of these militia groups that were more closely organized. But there was no grand scheme with Roger Stone and Alex Jones and all of these people to storm the Capitol and take hostages.»

Even Oath Keepers and Proud Boys are acquitted of planned actions.

FBI investigators did find that cells of protesters, including followers of the far-right Oath Keepers and Proud Boys groups, had aimed to break into the Capitol. But they found no evidence that the groups had serious plans about what to do if they made it inside, the sources said.

But what Reuters does not write is that both of these militias were infiltrated by FBI informants, and there is good reason to believe that the FBI was not only informed of everything in advance- but that it was they who pulled the strings and led the way.

Therefore, the article in Reuters may be an attempt to take the bull by the horns.

The New York Times had a similar article about an FBI informant who had infiltrated one of the militia groups and reported to the management. The fact that this particular newspaper revealed that the FBI was informed was interpreted as a sign that one wanted to be careful and take the sting out of what had to come from revelations.

Ideally, the January 6 committee would refer Trump to a criminal investigation. They have little to go on.

But so far prosecutors have steered clear of more serious, politically-loaded charges that the sources said had been initially discussed by prosecutors, such as seditious conspiracy or racketeering.

Again, we see that elected officials say one thing anonymously and something else in front of the camera.

Senior lawmakers have been briefed in detail on the results of the FBI’s investigation so far and find them credible, a Democratic congressional source said.

Trump is free from accusations that he participated in a conspiracy, something the media and prominent Democrats have given the impression of.

But the FBI has so far found no evidence that he or people directly around him were involved in organizing the violence, according to the four current and former law enforcement officials.

This is in stark contrast to what the Democrats and the media look up weekly: One finds a hole of six hours in Trump's phone log. NTB reports, but "forgets" to report that it was a false alarm.

Exclusive: FBI finds scant evidence U.S. Capitol attack was coordinated – sources
By Mark Hosenball and Sarah N. Lynch


Copy & Paste the link above for Yandex translation to Norwegian.

WHO and WHAT is behind it all ? : >

The bottom line is for the people to regain their original, moral principles, which have intentionally been watered out over the past generations by our press, TV, and other media owned by the Illuminati/Bilderberger Group, corrupting our morals by making misbehavior acceptable to our society. Only in this way shall we conquer this oncoming wave of evil.




All articles contained in Human-Synthesis are freely available and collected from the Internet. The interpretation of the contents is left to the readers and do not necessarily represent the views of the Administrator. Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). Human-Synthesis will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. Human-Synthesis grants permission to cross-post original Human-Synthesis articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified