The COVID Criminals.com 31 Jan 2022
The fascist collusion between government agencies, the hospital-medical-pharmaceutical industrial complex, the mainstream media, social media, search engines and other tech companies, large corporations, and even popular celebrities and "influencers" was designed to trick and coerce people into participating in a massive clinical trial [unapproved experimental mRNA gene therapy] under false pretenses including the penalties of job loss, loss of access to education and loss of social mobility.
THIS IS DOMESTIC TERRORISM
Please watch the videos below...The actions of Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Janet Woodcock, and Rick Bright must be independently investigated, and they must be held accountable for their crimes against humanity.
The following crimes are well documented and undeniable.
Petty bureaucrats and drug companies unjustly discredited an inexpensive FDA-approved drug that would have prevented COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths for political spite and financial gain. These perpetrators need to be held accountable for over 500,000 American deaths and the disruption of our economy.
Hydroxychloroquine, a safe and effective FDA-approved drug, was shown to prevent hospitalization if taken A.S.A.P. when early symptoms of COVID-19. The drug is cost-effective at 60 cents per tablet with COVID-19 treatment consisting of 11 tablets taken over five days. The FDA considers HCQ to be a safer drug than Tylenol.
On March 24, 2020, Dr. Woodcock wrongly advises Bright that HCQ is a dangerous drug requiring a EUA (Emergency Use Authorization). Its use should be limited to hospitalized patients.
Instead of taking hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) readily available to the general public for early treatment, as ordered, the FDA instead issued a EUA for hospital use only.
Bright and Dr. Woodcock promote this course of action, despite the early clinical data showing HCQ was the most effective in outpatients if given early during the initial infection, effectively eliminating hospitalization.
In a legal document, Rick Bright makes a blatant admission of insubordination to multiple layers of leadership, including the White House, HHS Secretary Azar, and Dr. Robert Kadlec, MD, the Assistant HHS Secretary for Preparedness and Readiness.
Bright states the following in his Whistleblower Complaint: “…instead of a Nationwide Expanded Access IND protocol. Implementing the EUA was a compromise position, to rein in HHS leadership’s initial campaign to make the drugs available to the public outside of a hospital setting“.
During a heated White House Situation Room meeting on April 4, 2020, Dr. Anthony Fauci MD, refused to consider the use of HCQ for COVID-19 treatment. He dismissed the ever-accumulating HCQ efficacy reports from China, South Korea, and France as simply “anecdotal.”
Dr. Fauci brushed off the accumulating evidence and diverts millions of federal funds into a program to test and manufacture an experimental drug named Remdesivir. Remdesivir must be administered via IV and can only in the hospital. Instead of early community treatment, as prescribed in the original pandemic plan. Dr. Fauci changed the plan to promote “Societal Lockdowns” and push the development of highly experimental mRNA vaccines by multinational pharmaceutical corporations.
On May 16, 2020, in Phase 1 clinical trials conducted by Gilead Sciences in cooperation with China and Japan, Remdesivir FAILED: It provided “no statistically clinical effect, with severe adverse reactions.”
On June 15, 2020, Dr. Fauci ignored the data that HCQ works if the drug is administered during the first five days of infection. The FDA falsely claims that HCQ is causing fatal heart rhythms in hospitalized patients when the COVID-19 virus itself is the cause. Hydroxychloroquine's EUA wass revoked, despite the overwhelming evidence of its effectiveness.
On June 29, 2020, Dr. Fauci recommends a 1.6-billion-dollar purchase of Remdesivir despite the drug’s Phase 1 failure in China.
On October 16, 2020, the WHO concludes that Remdesivir is an ineffective drug and does not recommend its use to treat COVID-19.
You can download the documents below...
ASTRAVEN posts (missing)
- Joe Biden (President of the United States) - Donald Trump (former President of the United States) - Nancy Pelosi (Speaker of the House of Representatives) - Kathy Hochul (Governor of New York) - Andrew Cuomo (Former Governor of New York) - Gavin Newsom (Governor of California) - Bill De Blasio (Former Mayor of New York City) - Lori Lightfoot (Mayor of Chicago) - Governors and mayors throughout the country - Members of City Councils throughout the country - Members of School Boards throughout the country
APPOINTED OFFICIALS - Anthony Fauci (Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) - Xavier Becerra (Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services) - Francis Sellers Collins (Former Director of the National Institutes of Health) - Rich Bright (Former director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) and HHS deputy assistant secretary for preparedness and response by the administration.) - Janet Woodcock (Commissioner of the FDA)
- Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee
- Rochelle P. Wolensky (Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
- Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) - Lloyd Austin (Secretary of the Department of Defense) - David Franz (Former Commander of Fort Dietrick) - Alejandro Mayorkas (Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security) - F. Fleming Crim (Chief Operating Officer of the National Science Foundation) - Eric Lander - Health Department officials throughout the country
JUDGES - Richard Frye (Columbus, Ohio) mandated COVID-19 "vaccines" as a condition of terms of probation.
PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES - Pfizer (Albert Bouria CEO) - BioNTech (Ugur Sahin CEO) - Moderna (Stéphane Bancel CEO) - Johnson & Johnson (Alex Gorsky CEO)
HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS
- Medical/Hospital Administrators - Doctors, nurses, and other health care practitioners - Pharmacists - Individuals who actually administer the injections
INDIVIDUAL CITIZENS - William Henry Gates III (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) - Ralph S. Baric (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill) - Peter Daszak (EcoHealth Alliance) - David R. Franz - Christian Hassell ADDITIONAL LINK - Robert Kadlec - Scott Dowell - Dustin Moskovitz - Business owners across the country who have ignored employees' religious exemptions and terminated employees anyway.
MAINSTREAM MEDIA. The "Trusted News Initiative" includes AP, AFP; BBC, CBC/Radio-Canada, European Broadcasting Union (EBU), Facebook, Financial Times, First Draft, Google/YouTube, The Hindu, Microsoft, Reuters, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, Twitter, The Washington Post. - BBC - New York Times - Eric Schmidt (Google) - Jeff Bezos (Washington Post/Amazon) - Mark Zuckerberg (CEO Facebook) - Jack Dorsey (CEO Twitter)
- Susan Wojcicki (CEO YouTube) - CNN
- Don Lemon - Chris Cuomo
U.S. Code:1. Treason
U.S. Code2. Lying to Congress
U.S. Code3. Wrongly claiming the existence of a public health emergency (and the ongoing continuation of such emergency) based upon inappropriate use of PCR tests to inflate the number of "cases" in the absence of an isolated, infectious pathogen.
U.S. Code4. Failure of both houses of Congress to vote on a Joint Resolution considering the end of the Emergency Declaration as REQUIRED by law.
U.S. Code5. Fraud.
- Falsely misrepresenting the injections as vaccines in order to avoid liability.
- Falsely misrepresenting study results overstating the benefits of the injections.
- Falsely misrepresenting and understating the risks of the injections.
U.S. Code6. Deprivation of rights (exceeding authority) under the "Color of Law"
U.S. Code7. Exceeding authority by conspiring with others to act under the "Color of Law"
U.S. Code8. Infringing upon freedom of speech (censorship).
Federal Register9. Vaccine mandates that discriminate or segregate people in violation of their claim to religious exemption, thus infringing upon their inalienable freedom of religion.
U.S. Code10. Infringing upon the right to privacy (requesting private medical information).11. Infringing upon the right to assemble freely and peacefully.12. Conducting a medical experiment and coercing people to participate while denying them even the possibility of providing their fully informed consent.
U.S. Code13. Creation and distribution of biological weapons.
U.S. Code14. Involuntary manslaughter due to experimental vaccine-related adverse effects, medical malpractice due to the use of ventilators at the wrong settings, and ineffective drugs such as remdesivir, or (pharmacists) refusing to provide legally prescribed medications for early treatment.
U.S. Code15. Marketing and distributing improperly and mislabeled drugs (gene therapies improperly marketed as vaccines).
U.S. code16. Failure to report adverse events to VAERS.
U.S. Code17. Advertising fraud ("Vaccine" advertisements failed to clearly explain the risk of adverse events.)
U.S. Code18. FDA approval of medical treatments ("vaccines", "boosters" and remdesivir) without adequate testing (animal and another testing) and without evidence of effectiveness while ignoring copious evidence of risk, danger, and harm.19. Wrongful termination of employment.20. Domestic terrorism is intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population via media propaganda, fear-mongering, vaccine mandates, and threats of termination of employment.
U.S. Code21. Undisclosed conflicts of interest.
U.S. Code22. Regulations regarding the completion of death certificates were changed without first being published in the Federal Register along with time allotted for public comment.
Procedures 23. Selling and injecting contaminated biological products.
U.S. Code 24. Practicing medicine without a license by overriding a medical doctor's advice by restricting the off-label use of approved medications for early treatment or by (pharmacists) refusing to provide legally prescribed medications for early treatment.
See individual state laws 25. Racial discrimination based on the fact that vaccine mandates mostly impact people of Latino, Black, and Native American descent since they have chosen to not receive the COVID-19 "vaccines" in greater proportion than people who are of Caucasian or Asian descent.
LAWS THAT MAY HAVE BEEN VIOLATED:15 U.S.C. §1-3
Trusts, etc., in restraint of trade illegal; penalty
(Conspiring to Criminal Commercial Activity)
15 U.S.C. §8
Trusts in restraint of import trade illegal; penalty
(Market Manipulation and Allocation)
15 U.S.C. § 19
Interlocking directorates and officers
18 U.S.C. § 241
Conspiracy against rights
18 U.S.C. § 242
Deprivation of rights under color of law
18 U.S. Code § 175
Prohibitions with respect to biological weapons
18 U.S. Code § 208
Acts affecting a personal financial interest
(Conflicts of interest)
18 U.S. Code CHAPTER 47
FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS
18 U.S.C. § 1001
Statements or entries generally
18 U.S. Code § 1112
18 U.S. Code § 2331
Definition of "Domestic Terrorism"
Acts that appear to be intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
18 U.S.C. § 2331 §§ 802
Acts of Domestic Terrorism resulting in death of American Citizens
18 U.S.C. §2339 C et seq.
Providing material support to terrorists
Funding and Conspiring to Commit Acts of Terror
18 U.S. Code § 2381
The term aid and comfort refer to any act that manifests a betrayal of allegiance to the United States, such as furnishing enemies with arms, troops, transportation, shelter, or classified information. If a subversive act has any tendency to weaken the power of the United States to attack or resist its enemies, aid and comfort has been given._____
21 C.F.R. § 50.24 et seq.
Exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research.
(No valid exceptions.)
21 CFR § 202.1
21 U.S. Code § 335c
Authority to withdraw approval of abbreviated drug applications
(1) shall withdraw approval of an abbreviated drug application if the Secretary finds that the approval was obtained, expedited, or otherwise facilitated through bribery, payment of an illegal gratuity, or fraud or material false statement."
21 U.S. Code § 351
Adulterated drugs and devices
35 U.S.C. §200 - 206
Disclosure of Government Interest
21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3
Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies
21 U.S. Code § 352
Misbranded drugs and devices
35 U.S.C. §101 – patenting nature_____
35 U.S.C. §206 – disclosure of government interest
42 U.S. Code § 2000a
Prohibition against discrimination or segregation in places of public accommodation
(a) Equal access
All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/2000a45 CFR § 46.116
General requirements for informed consent.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/45/46.11650 U.S.C. Section 1622(b)
Termination review of national emergencies by Congress
Not later than six months after a national emergency is declared, and not later than the end of each six-month period thereafter that such emergency continues, each House of Congress shall meet to consider a vote on a joint resolution to determine whether that emergency shall be terminated.
DECIDED - COURT CASES: LOUISIANA
Magliulo v. Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, No. 3:21-cv-02304 (W.D. La. Aug. 17, 2021):
Plaintiffs, current and entering students at the Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, challenge the school’s COVID-19 vaccination requirement, arguing it contravenes state law as well as state and federal constitutional arguments based on the right to bodily integrity and the right to religious freedom. On August 17, 2021, the court granted the students requested TRO. Louisiana law permits exclusion of unvaccinated students at the recommendation of the Louisiana Department of Public Health, and no such recommendation had been provided.
In the absence of this recommendation, and pursuant to another Louisiana provision, a student may not be subjected to a vaccination requirement if a written dissent is presented by the student. Additionally, with respect to Louisiana constitutional protections regarding the freedom of religion, paired with a Louisiana law requiring application of strict scrutiny, the court reasoned the College was unlikely to be able to show that it had used the least restrictive means of forwarding its interest.
Dahl et al., v. The Board of Trustees of Western Michigan University et al., No. 1:21-CV00757-PLM-SJB (W.D. Mich. Aug. 30, 2021):
Plaintiffs challenge Western Michigan University’s requirement that defendants obtain COVID-19 vaccination as a prerequisite to participate on the college soccer team. Plaintiffs argue the requirement violates the free exercise of religion and the fourteenth amendment protections of the right to privacy. Plaintiffs also allege the requirement violates the Michigan Constitution and constitutes discrimination in places of public accommodation. On August 31, 2021, the court granted the plaintiffs’ requested temporary restraining order on religious freedom grounds after requested religious exemptions were rejected. On September 13, the court granted the plaintiffs’ requested preliminary injunction. This order has been appealed to the Sixth Circuit. The Sixth Circuit declined to stay the injunction pending appeal on October 7.
Dr. A., et al. v. Hochul, et al., No. 1:21-cv-01009 (N.D.N.Y. Sept. 13, 2021):
Plaintiff healthcare workers challenged a New York State Department of Health regulation requiring vaccination of health care professionals without a religious exemption. The court granted the plaintiffs’ requested temporary restraining order on September 14, 2021. NEW YORK
We the Patriots USA, Inc., et al. v. Hochul, et al., No. 1:21-cv-04954 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 2, 2021):
Plaintiffs challenge New York State’s requirement that healthcare professionals in New York obtain COVID-19 vaccination without a religious exemption. On September 12, the district court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for TRO and preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs filed an interlocutory appeal. On September 30, citing the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo, 141 S. Ct. 63, 66 (2020), the Second Circuit enjoined enforcement of the mandate against persons claiming religious exemptions.
PENDING COURT CASES: CALIFORNIA
Jason Burcham, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., No. 2:21-cv-07296 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 11, 2021):
Plaintiff employees of the City challenge the City’s employee COVID-19 vaccination mandate, arguing it violates the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, the California Constitution’s right to privacy, substantive due process guarantees of bodily integrity, and federal law. The court has not yet issued a decision.
Firefighers4Freedom Foundation v. City of Los Angeles, No. 21STCV34490 (Ca. Super. Ct. Sept. 17, 2021):
Plaintiffs, Los Angeles City firefighters, challenge the City’s COVID-19 employee vaccine mandate, arguing the requirement violates privacy protections and is ultra vires. The court has not yet issued a decision.
Colorado Contractors Association et al. v. City & County of Denver, et al., No. 1:21-cv02663 (D. Colo. Sept. 30, 2021):
Plaintiffs challenge Denver’s COVID-19 vaccination order, arguing that the order requires contractors to enforce the order illegally, and that, among other arguments, it violates the constitutional contracts clause, the equal protection clause, and procedural due process rights. The court has not yet issued a decision.
Doe, et al. v. Austin, et al., No. 3:21-cv-01211 (N.D. Fla. Oct. 6, 2021):
Plaintiff service members challenge the Department of Defense’s (DOD) COVID-19 vaccination mandate. Plaintiffs allege, among other arguments, that the DOD has violated the Administrative Procedure Act, that such a mandate violates rights of informed consent and various federal statutes, and that the mandate violates substantive due process rights, equal protection guarantees, and violates the separation of powers. The court has not yet issued a decision.
Pelekai v. State of Hawai’i, No. 1:21-CV-00343 (D. Haw. Aug. 13, 2021):
Plaintiff first responders in Hawai’i filed a class action challenging the state’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate in Oahu and Maui, arguing the requirement is preempted by and violates federal law, violates substantive and procedural due process, equal protection, the 5th Amendment right to bodily integrity, and free exercise protections. The court has not yet reached a decision. MARYLAND
Pavlock, et al. v. Perman, M.D. et al., No. 1:21-cv-02376 (D. Md. Sept. 16, 2021):
Plaintiffs challenge the University System of Maryland’s COVID-19 vaccination mandate, alleging it violates liberty interests protected by the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments, as well as federal and state law and the precedent set in Jacobson v. Massachusetts. The court has not yet issued a decision.
Doe v. The Board of Education of Montgomery County, et al., No. 8:21-cv-02481 (D. Md. Sept. 28, 2021):
Plaintiffs challenge a resolution issued by the Board of Education of Montgomery County, Maryland, requiring employees of public schools in the county to obtain COVID-19 vaccinations. Plaintiffs argue the mandate violates the free exercise clause, Maryland constitutional guarantees, the equal protection clause, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, and Maryland law. The court has not yet reached a decision.
Roe 1, et al. v. Allina Health System, et al., No. 0:21-cv-02127 (D. Minn. Sept. 27, 2021):
Plaintiffs challenge a series of health care facility COVID-19 employee vaccination mandates, arguing the requirements violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the free exercise clause, Minnesota law, the Fourteenth Amendment’s protection of bodily integrity, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. The court has not yet issued a decision.
Messina, et al. v. The College of New Jersey, et al., No. 3:21-cv-17576 (D.N.J. Sept. 27, 2021):
Plaintiffs challenge the College’s student vaccination mandate, arguing it violates Fourteenth Amendment equal protection, liberty, and privacy rights as well as the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable search and seizure and procedural due process guarantees. The court has not yet issued a decision.
The Clementine Company, LLC, et al. v. De Blasio, No. 1:21-cv-07779 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2021):
Plaintiff theaters/comedy clubs challenge New York City’s COVID-19 vaccination requirement to enter such venues, arguing the requirement violates free speech protections and equal protection. The court has not yet issued a decision.
Nyamoti v. The Mount Sinai Hospital, et al., No. 1:21-cv-08020 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 27, 2021):
Plaintiffs challenge a hospital employee vaccination mandate, arguing the mandate violates the free exercise clause by failing to provide a religious exemption. The court has not yet issued a decision.
Doe, et al. v. Austin, et al., No. 3:21-cv-01211 (N.D. Fla. Oct. 6, 2021):
Plaintiff servicemembers challenge the Department of Defense’s (DOD) COVID-19 vaccination mandate. Plaintiffs allege, among other arguments, that the DOD has violated the Administrative Procedure Act, that such a mandate violates rights of informed consent and various federal statutes, and that the mandate violates substantive due process rights, equal protection guarantees, and violates the separation of powers. The court has not yet issued a decision.
Oregon Fraternal Order of Police, et al. v. Brown, No. 21CV35125 (County Court, Oregon, Sept. 3, 2021):
Oregon state police officers challenge Governor Kate Brown’s state vaccine mandate, which requires vaccination for all state executive branch employees. Among other arguments, plaintiffs argue that the mandate violates constitutional free speech and free expression protections, constitutes wrongful termination, and further violates privileges and immunities, equal protection, due process, and separation of powers principles. On September 7, 2021, the case was removed to federal court. Plaintiffs subsequently filed an unopposed motion to remand to state court on September 10, 2021.
Pennsylvania Informed Consent Advocates, Inc. v. University of Pennsylvania Health System, et al., No. 5:21-cv-04415 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 7, 2021):
Plaintiff organization challenged proof of COVID-19 vaccination requirements set by the University of Pennsylvania Health System for employees, arguing that such requirements constitute “compelled speech,” and violate rights to free exercise and bodily autonomy. Plaintiffs further argue that the resulting employment action would constitute wrongful dismissal. The court has not yet issued a decision.
Herndon, et al. v. Walz, et al., No 2021CP1004391 (S.C. Cir. Ct. Sept. 23, 2021):
Plaintiffs, employees at St. John Fire District, challenge the fire district’s COVID-19 employee vaccine mandate, arguing it violates the South Carolina Constitution, South Carolina law, the Fourteenth Amendment’s substantive due process protections, the freedom of speech, and equal protection guarantees. The court has not yet issued a decision.
Hamilton, et al. v. Tecklenburg, et al., No. 2021CP1004394 (S.C. Cir. Ct. Sept. 23, 2021):
Plaintiffs, including City of Charleston Fire Department employees, challenge the county’s COVID-19 employee vaccine mandate, arguing it violates the South Carolina Constitution, South Carolina law, the Fourteenth Amendment’s substantive due process protections, the freedom of speech, and equal protection guarantees. The court has not yet issued a decision.
Tucker, et al. v. Johnson, et al., No. 2021CP1004397 (S.C. Cir. Ct. Sept. 23, 2021):
Plaintiffs, employees at the Charleston County Sheriff’s Office, challenge the county’s COVID-19 employee vaccine mandate, arguing it violates the South Carolina Constitution, South Carolina law, the Fourteenth Amendment’s substantive due process protections, the freedom of speech, and equal protection guarantees. The court has not yet issued a decision.
Condon, et al. v. Ascension Health Alliance, et al., No. 3:21-cv-00728 (M.D. Tenn. Sept. 20, 2021):
Plaintiff employees challenge Ascension Health Alliance’s employee COVID-19 vaccine mandate, seeking declaratory relief indicating that the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act prohibits vaccine mandates for EUA products and further that the mandate violates provisions in the Code of Federal Regulations. The court has not yet issued a decision.
Sambrano, et al. v. United Airlines, Inc., No: 4:21-cv-01074 (N.D. Tex. Sept. 21, 2021):
Plaintiff United Airlines employees challenge the airline’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for failing to provide religious or medical accommodations, arguing such action constitutes religious and disability-based discrimination in violation of federal law. The court has not yet issued a decision
Pilz, et al. v Inslee, et al., No. 3:21-cv-05735 (W.D. Wa. Oct. 5, 2021):
Plaintiffs challenge Washington COVID-19 vaccination mandates for state workers, arguing the Governor lacked the authority to promulgate such a mandate, and that the mandate infringes the Americans with Disabilities Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, and, among additional arguments, constitutional equal protection, religious exercise, privacy, and due process guarantees. The court has not yet issued a decision.
Costin, et al. v. Biden, et al., No. 1:21-cv-02484 (D.D.C. Sept. 23, 2021):
Plaintiffs challenge President Biden’s executive orders and the Department of Defense’s vaccine mandate, arguing the requirements violate substantive due process, equal protection, the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the Administrative Procedures Act, and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The court has not yet issued a decision.
COURT CASESAmerica's Frontline Doctors vs. Xavier Becerra
CONFLICTS OF INTERESThttps://renz-law.com/wp-content/uploads/TR-1-Ex-K-Conflicts.pdf
ADDITIONAL LINKS Click on the links below for additional details:
- The CDC's Unconstitutional Patents
- Funding and Conspiring to Commit Acts of Terror
- Acts of Domestic Terrorism resulting in death of American Citizens
- Lying to Congress
- Conspiring to Criminal Commercial Activity
- Market Manipulation and Allocation
- Interlocking Directorates
- Disclosure of Government Interest
- Illegal Clinical Trial
- The vaccines are contaminated with graphene oxide
THE FAUCI DOSSIER:
The above list only includes COVID criminals based in the United States. There are many more bad actors worldwide.
If your freedoms and/or rights are ever violated, please identify the criminal.
The bottom line is for the people to regain their original, moral principles, which have intentionally been watered out over the past generations by our press, TV, and other media owned by the Illuminati/Bilderberger Group, corrupting our morals by making misbehavior acceptable to our society. Only in this way shall we conquer this oncoming wave of evil.
All articles contained in Human-Synthesis are freely available and collected from the Internet. The interpretation of the contents is left to the readers and do not necessarily represent the views of the Administrator. Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). Human-Synthesis will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. Human-Synthesis grants permission to cross-post original Human-Synthesis articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified