4 min read

"Happy Father's Day all Mothers"

Oslo 20211101. Minister of Culture and Gender Equality, Anette Trettebergstuen, after the meeting with leaders of the Norwegian Sports Confederation at the Ministry of Culture in Oslo. Photo: Stian Lysberg Solum / NTB

Document.no - By: Kjell Skartveit   November 14, 2021, 3:00 p.m.

Fathers are important, the Stefanus Alliance claims in an advertising campaign on the occasion of Father's Day, and asks readers to support the organization. They write that you know that your father is important to you and that with their cut-out tie father day card you can say just this - at the same time as you support a father who is not allowed to live as a father to his children. Your father will then be part of the Stefanus Alliance's proud community of fathers who support fathers on Father's Day.

Beautifully said, we can agree on that. But is it really allowed to believe that fathers are important in 2021?

It can be difficult to get the "modern" and "liberal" man to be negative to same-sex marriage, Pride and the organization FRI. But if you say yes to same-sex marriage, it is very difficult to accept the claim that fathers are important. Everything testifies that anyone who believes that something is true, who says yes to the Stefanus Alliance's promotion of fathers, has to say no to current marriage legislation, and the reason is simple and brutal: The same-sex marriage is built on a lie that must be defended ideologically and legally, and it is the belief in father that must go away.

Same-sex marriage abolishes the importance of the father for the child, which is confirmed by the introduction of a co-mother, but also by the decision to finance artificial insemination for single women. With this latest decision, the Storting in principle abolished the father as a person with significance in the lives of all children. The Storting can not say that fathers mean something to the lucky ones, but not to everyone. What the Storting decided on this day in May in 2020 was therefore in reality a rejection of the mother-father-child relationship, and an acceptance of the idea that it is okay if all children are born to single mothers at the expense of the state.

The biggest lie is probably still visible in the lesbian couple and the Storting's claim that the co-mother can take over for father. As everyone knows, two women cannot have children together, a man is needed to make this possible, and technological development can never remove us from the fact that the child consists of two sets of genetic origins, one from father and one from mother.

It is not difficult to understand that this reality must be covered. Children born into lesbian relationships or by single mothers conceived at the expense of the state, can not face a kindergarten or school that emphasizes the father as an ideal, as any child needs. Therefore, it is stated in the kindergarten's framework plan that the children, in charity, should learn that all types of families are equally normal, that one should not emphasize the role of the father. The same applies to primary school. There is every reason to believe that today's schools are very careful about keeping their fathers. The curricula are clear: it is diversity that must be cultivated, and then the truth is lost. The pupils in Norwegian schools are not to be offended, and it is not so difficult to see that the claim about the importance of fathers in children's lives can do just that.

The last objection to the claim that fathers are important, we take from the law's claim of floating gender identity. There is every reason to believe that the Stephen's Alliance means biological men when they talk about fathers. But we know that a claim that fathers are biological men will offend all trans men. And today's legislation is on the side of the trans movement. It is about protecting a perception of reality where gender is conditioned by our subjective experiences, not by objective truths. And when sex is fluid, one can not claim that the biological danger is important, because he no longer exists.

We see the same thing happening in the church. There it is the belief in God as father that is problematized by the liberals. How Jesus Christ teaches us to pray to God has no bearing on a movement that has given itself the power to redefine nature. Even God must bow to them.

An assertion that fathers are important will thus be perceived as an attack on lesbian couples and single mothers, and therefore the Storting has also implemented comprehensive legislation to break our belief in the importance of fathers. Discrimination legislation and the penal code are both about defending a conception of reality that is contrary to Christian faith and science. We must therefore not be surprised by the intensity of the attacks that affect even radical feminists in academia. Holding on to biological realities is today's taboo and is branded as a blasphemy.

What should make us stop and think is that one can not emphasize the role of fathers in children's lives and at the same time say yes to same-sex marriage and Pride. One excludes the other. Then there is reason to hope that most of us, even those who perceive themselves as both tolerant, liberal and modern, still believe that fathers are important, take the consequences of it, despite the attacks from postmodern activists and Norwegian legislators, and congratulate the fathers with the day!


Copy & Paste the link above for Yandex translation to Norwegian.

WHO and WHAT is behind it all ? : >

The bottom line is for the people to regain their original, moral principles, which have intentionally been watered out over the past generations by our press, TV, and other media owned by the Illuminati/Bilderberger Group, corrupting our morals by making misbehavior acceptable to our society. Only in this way shall we conquer this oncoming wave of evil.




All articles contained in Human-Synthesis are freely available and collected from the Internet. The interpretation of the contents is left to the readers and do not necessarily represent the views of the Administrator. Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). Human-Synthesis will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. Human-Synthesis grants permission to cross-post original Human-Synthesis articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified