20 min read

Covid-19 does not exist as a virus, but rather as a bacteria

Singapore Performs Autopsy On COVID-19 Body

RealNewsCast - By Chris Wick - AUG 23, 2021 - (original)

Did Rockefeller Institute create the Spanish Flu in 1918? (or EPUB)

This was just received:  17 October 2021

Singapore has become the first country in the world to perform an autopsy (post-mortem) of a COVID-19 body. After a thorough investigation, it was discovered that Covid-19 does not exist as a virus, but rather as a bacteria that has been exposed to radiation and causes human death by clotting in the blood.

It was found that Covid-19 disease causes blood clots, which leads to blood clotting in humans, and causes blood to clot in the veins, making it difficult for a person to breathe; Because the brain, heart and lungs cannot receive oxygen, causing people to die quickly.

To find the cause of the shortage of respiratory power, doctors in Singapore did not listen to WHO protocol and performed an autopsy on COVID-19.
After doctors opened and carefully examined the arms, legs and other parts of the body, they noticed that the blood vessels were dilated and filled with blood clots, which impeded blood flow and also reduced the flow of oxygen in the body causes the death of the patient.

After learning about this research, Singapore's Ministry of Health immediately changed the Covid-19 treatment protocol and gave aspirin to its positive patients. I started taking 100mg and Imromac. As a result, patients began to recover and their health began to improve.
Singapore's Ministry of Health evacuated more than 14,000 patients in one day and sent them home.

After a period of scientific discovery, doctors in Singapore explained the method of treatment by saying that the disease was a global hoax, “It is nothing but intravascular coagulation (blood clots) and a method of treatment. antibiotic tablets Anti-inflammatory and Take anticoagulants (aspirin).
This indicates that the disease can be cured.

According to other Singapore scientists, ventilators and an intensive care unit (ICU) were never needed. Protocols for this purpose have already been published in Singapore.

China already knows this, but has never released its report.

Share this information with your family, neighbors, acquaintances, friends and colleagues so that they can shake off the fear of Covid-19 and realize that this is not a virus, but a bacteria that has only been exposed to radiation.

Only people with very low immunity should be careful.
This radiation also causes inflammation and hypoxia.
Victims should take Asprin-100mg and Apronik or Paracetamol 650mg.


Said Dr. Fauci`s NIH in 2005, "concentrations of 10 uM completely abolishes SARS-CoV infection."  Fauci`s researchers add, "chloroquine can effectively reduce the establishment of infection and spread of SARS-CoV,"


IT IS ALSO CONFIRMED IN A PREVIOUS ARTICLE

Did Rockefeller create the ‘Spanish Flu’ pandemic of 1918? (EPUB)

It Started with the Rockefeller Institute’s Crude Bacterial Meningitis Vaccination Experiment on US Troops. The 1918-19 bacterial vaccine experiment may have killed 50-100 million people.

What if the story we have been told about this pandemic isn’t true? What if, instead, the killer infection was neither the flu nor Spanish in origin? Newly analyzed documents reveal that the “Spanish Flu” may have been a military vaccine experiment gone awry. Summary The reason modern technology has not been able to pinpoint the killer influenza strain from this pandemic is that influenza was not the killer. More soldiers died during WWI from the disease than from bullets.

The  pandemic  was  not  flu.  An  estimated  95%  (or  higher)  of  the  deaths  were  caused  by  bacterial pneumonia, not an influenza virus. The  pandemic  was  not  Spanish.  The  first  cases  of  bacterial  pneumonia  in  1918  trace  back  to  military bases, the first one in Fort Riley, Kansas. From January 21 – June 4, 1918, an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine cultured in horses by the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research in New York was injected into soldiers at Fort Riley. During the remainder of 1918 as those soldiers – often living and traveling under poor sanitary conditions –  were  sent  to  Europe  to  fight,  they  spread  bacteria  at  every  stop  between  Kansas  and  the  frontline trenches in France.

One study describes soldiers “with active infections (who) were aerosolizing the bacteria that colonized their  noses  and  throats,  while  others—often,  in  the  same  “breathing  spaces”—were  profoundly susceptible  to  invasion  of  and  rapid  spread  through  their  lungs  by  their  own  or  others’  colonizing bacteria.” (1) The  “Spanish  Flu”  attacked  healthy  people  in  their  prime.    Bacterial  pneumonia  attacks  people  in  their prime. Flu attacks the young, old, and immunocompromised. When  WW1  ended  on  November  11,  1918,  soldiers  returned  to  their  home  countries  and  colonial outposts, spreading the killer bacterial pneumonia worldwide. During WW1, the Rockefeller Institute also sent its experimental anti­meningococcal serum to England, France, Belgium, Italy, and other countries, helping spread the epidemic worldwide.

During  the  pandemic  of  1918­19,  the  so­called  “Spanish  Flu”  killed  50­100  million  people,  including many soldiers. Many people do not realize that disease killed far more soldiers on all sides than machine guns or mustard gas or anything else typically associated with WWI. I  have  a  personal  connection  to  the  Spanish  Flu.    Among  those  killed  by  the  disease  in  1918­19  are members of both of my parents’ families. On  my  father’s  side,  his  grandmother  Sadie  Hoyt  died  from  pneumonia  in  1918.  Sadie  was  a  Chief Yeoman in the Navy.  Her death left my grandmother Rosemary and her sister Anita to be raised by their aunt. Sadie’s sister Marian also joined the Navy.  

She died from “influenza” in 1919. On my mother’s side, two of her father’s sisters died in childhood. All of the family members who died lived in New York City. I suspect many American families, and many families worldwide were impacted in similar ways by the mysterious Spanish Flu. In 1918, “influenza” or flu was a catchall term for disease of unknown origin.  It didn’t carry the specific meaning it does today. It meant some mystery disease that dropped out of the sky.  In fact, influenza is from the Medieval Latin “influential” in an astrological sense, meaning a visitation under the influence of the stars. Why is What Happened 100 Years Ago Important Now? Between 1900­1920, there were enormous efforts underway in the industrialized world to build a better society.  

I will use New York as an example to discuss three major changes to society that occurred in NY during that time and their impact on mortality from infectious diseases. 1. Clean Water and Sanitation  In the late 19th century through the early 20th century, New York built an extraordinary system to bring clean water to the city from the Catskills, a system still in use today.  New York City also built over 6000 miles of sewer to take away and treat waste, which protects the drinking water. The World Health Organization acknowledges the importance of clean water and sanitation in combating infectious diseases. (2) 2. Electricity  In the late 19th century through the early 20th century, New York built a power grid and wired the city so power was available in every home.  Electricity allows for refrigeration. Refrigeration is an unsung hero as  a  public  health  benefit.

When food is refrigerated from farm to table, the public is protected from potential  infectious  diseases.    Cheap  renewable  energy  is  important  for  many  reasons,  including combating infectious diseases. 3. Rockefeller’s Pharmaceutical Industry  In the late 19th century through the early 20th century, New York became the home of the Rockefeller Institute  for  Medical  Research  (now  Rockefeller  University).  The  Institute  is  where  the  modern pharmaceutical  industry  was  born.  The  Institute  pioneered  many  of  the  approaches  the  pharmaceutical industry uses today, including the preparation of vaccine serums, for better or worse.  

The vaccine used in the Fort Riley experiment on soldiers was made in horses. US  Mortality  Rates  data  from  the  turn  of  the  20th  century  to  1965  clearly  indicates  that  clean  water, flushing  toilets,  effective  sewer  systems,  and  refrigerated  foods  all  combined  to  effectively  reduce mortality from infectious diseases BEFORE vaccines for those diseases became available. Have  doctors  and  the  pharmaceutical  manufacturers  have  taken  credit  for  reducing  mortality  from infectious disease which rightfully belongs to sandhogs, plumbers, electricians, and engineers? If hubris at the Rockefeller Institute in 1918 led to a pandemic disease which killed millions of people, what lessons can we learn and apply to 2018? The Disease Was Not Spanish While watching an episode of American Experience on PBS

(https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/films/influenza/)  

a  few  months  ago,  I  was  surprised  to hear  that  the  first  cases  of  “Spanish  Flu”  occurred  at  Fort  Riley,  Kansas  in  1918.    I  thought,  how  is  it possible this historically important event could be so badly misnamed 100 years ago and never corrected? Why “Spanish”? Spain was one of a few countries not involved in World War I.  Most of the countries involved in the war censored their press. Free  from  censorship  concerns,  the  earliest  press  reports  of  people  dying  from  the  disease  in  large numbers came from Spain. The warring countries did not want to additionally frighten the troops, so they were  content  to  scapegoat  Spain.  

Soldiers  on  all  sides  would  be  asked  to  cross  no  man’s  land  into machine­gun  fire,  which  was  frightening  enough  without  knowing  that  the  trenches  were  a  disease breeding ground. One hundred years later, it’s long past time to drop “Spanish” from all discussion of this pandemic. If the flu  started  at  a  United  States  military  base  in  Kansas,  then  the  disease  could  and  should  be  more  aptly named. In order to prevent future disasters, the US (and the rest of the world) must take a hard look at what really caused the pandemic.

It is possible that one of the reasons the Spanish Flu has never been corrected is that it helps disguise the origin of the pandemic. If  the  origin  of  the  pandemic  involved  a  vaccine  experiment  on  US  soldiers,  then  the  US  may  prefer calling it Spanish Flu instead of The Fort Riley Bacteria of 1918, or something similar.  The Spanish Flu started  at  the  location  this  experimental  bacterial  vaccine  was  given  making  it  the  prime  suspect  as  the source of the bacterial infections which killed so many.

It would be much more difficult to maintain the marketing mantra of “vaccines save lives” if a vaccine experiment originating in the United States during the years of primitive manufacturing caused the deaths of 50­100 million people. “The American Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research and its experimental bacterial meningococcal vaccine may have killed 50­100 million people in 1918­19” is a far less effective sales slogan than the overly simplistic ‘vaccines save lives’.” – Kevin Barry

The Disease Which Killed so Many was not Flu nor was it a Virus.  It was Bacterial During  the  mid­2000s  there  was  much  talk  about  “pandemic  preparedness.”    Influenza  vaccine manufacturers in the United States received billions of taxpayer dollars to develop vaccines to make sure that we don’t have another lethal pandemic “flu,” like the one in 1918­19. Capitalizing on the “flu” part of Spanish flu helped vaccine manufacturers procure billion­dollar checks from governments, even though scientists knew at the time that bacterial pneumonia was the real killer.

It  is  not  my  opinion  that  bacterial  pneumonia  was  the  real  killer  –  thousands  of  autopsies  confirm  this fact. According to a 2008 National Institute of Health paper, bacterial pneumonia was the killer in a minimum of 92.7% of the 1918­19 autopsies reviewed.  It is likely higher than 92.7%. The researchers looked at more than 9,000 autopsies, and “there were no negative (bacterial) lung culture results.”

“…  In  the  68  higher­quality  autopsy  series,  in  which  the  possibility  of  unreported  negative cultures could be excluded, 92.7% of autopsy lung cultures were positive for ≥1 bacterium. … in one  study  of  approximately  9000  subjects  who  were  followed  from  clinical  presentation  with influenza to resolution or autopsy, researchers obtained, with sterile technique, cultures of either pneumococci or streptococci from 164 of 167 lung tissue samples.

“There  were  89  pure  cultures  of  pneumococci;  19  cultures  from  which  only  streptococci  were recovered; 34 that yielded mixtures of pneumococci and/or streptococci; 22 that yielded a mixture of pneumococci, streptococci, and other organisms (prominently pneumococci and nonhemolytic streptococci);  and  3  that  yielded  nonhemolytic  streptococci  alone. There  were  no  negative  lung culture results.” (3)

Pneumococci  or  streptococci  were  found  in  “164  of  (the)  167  lung  tissue  samples”  autopsied.   That  is 98.2%. Bacteria was the killer. Where Did the Spanish Flu Bacterial Pneumonia of 1918­19 Originate? When the United States declared war in April 1917, the fledgling Pharmaceutical industry had something they had never had before – a large supply of human test subjects in the form of the US military’s first draft. Pre­war  in  1917,  the  US Army  was  286,000  men.  Post­war  in  1920,  the  US  army  disbanded  and  had 296,000 men. During the war years 1918­19, the US Army ballooned to 6,000,000 men, with 2,000,000 men being sent overseas.  The  Rockefeller  Institute  for  Medical  Research  took  advantage  of  this  new  pool  of  human guinea pigs to conduct vaccine experiments.

A  Report  on  Anti­meningitis  Vaccination  and  Observations  on  Agglutinins  in  the  Blood  of  Chronic Meningococcus Carriers as Recorded by Frederick L. Gates, MD in 1918. From  the  Base  Hospital,  Fort  Riley,  Kansas,  and  The  Rockefeller  Institute  for  Medical  Research,  New York. Received July 20, 1918. Between  January  21st  and  June  4th  of  1918,  Dr.  Gates  reports  on  an  experiment  where  soldiers  were given 3 doses of a bacterial meningitis vaccine.  Those conducting the experiment on the soldiers were just spitballing dosages of a vaccine serum made in horses. The vaccination regime was designed to be 3 doses. 4,792 men received the first dose, but only 4,257 got the 2nd dose (down 11%), and only 3702 received all three doses (down 22.7%).

A  total  of  1,090  men  were  not  there  for  the  3rd  dose.    What  happened  to  these  soldiers?  Were  they shipped East by train from Kansas to board a ship to Europe?  Were they in the Fort Riley hospital? Dr. Gates’ report doesn’t tell us. An article accompanying the American Experience broadcast I watched sheds some light on where these 1,090 men might be. Gates began his experiments in January 1918. By March of that year, “100 men a day” were entering the infirmary at Fort Riley. Are some of these the men missing from Dr. Gates’ report – the ones who did not get the 2nd or 3rd dose?

“…  Shortly  before  breakfast  on  Monday,  March  11,  the  first  domino  would  fall  signaling  the commencement of the first wave of the 1918 influenza. “Company cook Albert Gitchell reported to the camp infirmary with complaints of a “bad cold.” “Right behind him came Corporal Lee W. Drake voicing similar complaints. “By noon, camp surgeon Edward R. Schreiner had over 100 sick men on his hands, all apparently suffering from the same malady…” (5)

Gates does report that several of the men in the experiment had flu­like symptoms: coughs, vomiting, and diarrhea after receiving the vaccine. These symptoms are a disaster for men living in barracks, traveling on trains to the Atlantic coast, sailing to Europe, and living and fighting in trenches. The unsanitary conditions at each step of the journey are an ideal environment for a contagious disease like bacterial pneumonia to spread.

“…  In  the  68  higher­quality  autopsy  series,  in  which  the  possibility  of  unreported  negative cultures could be excluded, 92.7% of autopsy lung cultures were positive for ≥1 bacterium. … in one  study  of  approximately  9000  subjects  who  were  followed  from  clinical  presentation  with influenza to resolution or autopsy, researchers obtained, with sterile technique, cultures of either pneumococci or streptococci from 164 of 167 lung tissue samples. “There  were  89  pure  cultures  of  pneumococci;  19  cultures  from  which  only  streptococci  were recovered; 34 that yielded mixtures of pneumococci and/or streptococci; 22 that yielded a mixture of pneumococci, streptococci, and other organisms (prominently pneumococci and nonhemolytic streptococci);  and  3  that  yielded  nonhemolytic  streptococci  alone. There  were  no  negative  lung culture results.” (3)

Pneumococci  or  streptococci  were  found  in  “164  of  (the)  167  lung  tissue  samples”  autopsied.   That  is 98.2%. Bacteria was the killer. Where Did the Spanish Flu Bacterial Pneumonia of 1918­19 Originate? When the United States declared war in April 1917, the fledgling Pharmaceutical industry had something they had never had before – a large supply of human test subjects in the form of the US military’s first draft. Pre­war  in  1917,  the  US Army  was  286,000  men.  Post­war  in  1920,  the  US  army  disbanded  and  had 296,000 men. During the war years 1918­19, the US Army ballooned to 6,000,000 men, with 2,000,000 men being sent overseas.  The  Rockefeller  Institute  for  Medical  Research  took  advantage  of  this  new  pool  of  human guinea pigs to conduct vaccine experiments.

A  Report  on  Anti­meningitis  Vaccination  and  Observations  on  Agglutinins  in  the  Blood  of  Chronic Meningococcus Carriers as Recorded by Frederick L. Gates, MD in 1918. From  the  Base  Hospital,  Fort  Riley,  Kansas,  and  The  Rockefeller  Institute  for  Medical  Research,  New York. Received July 20, 1918. Between  January  21st  and  June  4th  of  1918,  Dr.  Gates  reports  on  an  experiment  where  soldiers  were given 3 doses of a bacterial meningitis vaccine.  Those conducting the experiment on the soldiers were just spitballing dosages of a vaccine serum made in horses. The vaccination regime was designed to be 3 doses. 4,792 men received the first dose, but only 4,257 got the 2nd dose (down 11%), and only 3702 received all three doses (down 22.7%).

“Finally,  for  brief  periods  and  to  varying  degrees,  affected  hosts  became  “cloud  adults”  who increased the aerosolization of colonizing strains of bacteria, particularly pneumococci, hemolytic streptococci, H. influenzae, and S. aureus. “For  several  days  during  local  epidemics—particularly  in  crowded  settings  such  as  hospital wards,  military  camps,  troop  ships,  and  mines  (and  trenches)—some  persons  were immunologically susceptible to, infected with, or recovering from infections with influenza virus.

“Persons  with  active  infections  were  aerosolizing  the  bacteria  that  colonized  their  noses  and throats,  while  others—often,  in  the  same  “breathing  spaces”—were  profoundly  susceptible  to invasion of and rapid spread through their lungs by their own or others’ colonizing bacteria.” (1)

Three times in his report on the Fort Riley vaccine experiment, Dr. Gates states that some soldiers had a “severe reaction” indicating “an unusual individual susceptibility to the vaccine”. While the vaccine made many sick, it only killed those who were susceptible to it.  Those who became sick  and  survived  became  “cloud  adults”  who  spread  the  bacteria  to  others,  which  created  more  cloud adults, spreading to others where it killed the susceptible, repeating the cycle until there were no longer wartime unsanitary conditions, and there were no longer millions of soldiers to experiment on. The  toll  on  US  troops  was  enormous  and  it  is  well  documented.  Dr.  Carol  Byerly  describes  how  the “influenza”  traveled  like  wildfire  through  the  US  military.    (substitute  “bacteria”  for  Dr.  Byerly’s “influenza” or “virus”):

“… Fourteen of the largest training camps had reported influenza outbreaks in March, April, or May, and some of the infected troops carried the virus with them aboard ships to France … “As  soldiers  in  the  trenches  became  sick,  the  military  evacuated  them  from  the  front  lines  and replaced them with healthy men. “This  process  continuously  brought  the  virus  into  contact  with  new  hosts—young,  healthy soldiers  in  which  it  could  adapt,  reproduce,  and  become  extremely  virulent  without  danger  of burning out. “… Before any travel ban could be imposed, a contingent of replacement troops departed Camp Devens  (outside  of  Boston)  for  Camp  Upton,  Long  Island,  the  Army’s  debarkation  point  for France, and took influenza with them. “Medical  officers  at  Upton  said  it  arrived  “abruptly”  on  September  13,  1918,  with  38  hospital admissions, followed by 86 the next day, and 193 the next.

“Hospital admissions peaked on October 4 with 483, and within 40 days, Camp Upton sent 6,131 men  to  the  hospital  for  influenza.  Some  developed  pneumonia  so  quickly  that  physicians diagnosed it simply by observing the patient rather than listening to the lungs…” (7) “The  United  States  was  not  the  only  country  in  possession  of  the  Rockefeller  Institute’s experimental bacterial vaccine. “A 1919 report from the Institute states: “Reference should be made that before the United States entered the war (in April 1917) the Institute had resumed the preparation of anti­meningococcic serum, in order to meet the requests of England, France, Belgium Italy and other countries.” “The same report states: “In order to meet the suddenly increased demand for the curative serums worked out at the Institute, a special stable for horses was quickly erected …” (8)

An  experimental  anti­meningococci  serum  made  in  horses  and  injected  into  soldiers  who  would  be entering the cramped and unsanitary living conditions of war … what could possibly go wrong? Is the bacterial serum made in horses at the Rockefeller Institute which was injected into US soldiers and distributed to numerous other countries responsible for the 50­100 million people killed by bacterial lung infections in 1918­19? The Institute says it distributed the bacterial serum to England, France, Belgium, Italy, and other countries during WWI. Not enough is known about how these countries experimented on their soldiers.

I hope independent researchers will take an honest look at these questions. The Road to Hell is Paved with Good Intentions I do not believe that anyone involved in these vaccine experiments was trying to harm anyone. Some will see  the  name  Rockefeller  and  yell.  “Illuminati!”  or  “culling  the  herd!”.  I  do  not  believe  that’s  what happened. I believe standard medical hubris is responsible – doctors “playing God”, thinking they can tame nature without  creating  unanticipated  problems. With  medical  hubris,  I  do  not  think  the  situation  has  changed materially over the past 100 years. What Now? The vaccine industry is always looking for human test subjects.  

They have the most success when they are able to find populations who not in a position to refuse. Soldiers  (9),  infants,  the  disabled,  prisoners,  those  in  developing  nations  –  anyone  not  in  a  position  to refuse. Vaccine experimentation on vulnerable populations is not an issue of the past.  Watch this video clip of Dr.  Stanley  Plotkin  where  he  describes  using  experimental  vaccines  on  orphans,  the  mentally  retarded, prisoners, and those under colonial rule. The deposition was in January 2018. The hubris of the medical community is the same or worse now than it was 100 years ago. Watch as Dr. Plotkin admits to writing:

“The question is whether we are to have experiments performed on fully functioning adults and on children who are potentially contributors to society or to perform initial studies in children and adults who are human in form but not in social potential.”

Please watch the horrifying video clip of Dr. Stanley Plotkin testifying under oath about the experiments that  the  pharmaceutical  industry  has  done  on  unaware,  uninformed  patients.  


Dr. Stanley "Human-in-Form" Plotkin, re: experiments…

Rockefeller Institute laboratory - New York City In part, because the global community is well aware of medical hubris and well aware of the poor record of  medical  ethics,  the  Universal  Declaration  on  Bioethics  and  Human  Rights  developed  international standards regarding the right to informed consent to preventative medical procedures like vaccination. The international community is well aware that the pharmaceutical industry makes mistakes and is always on the lookout for human test subjects.  The Declaration states that individuals have the human right to consent to any preventative medical intervention like vaccination.

Article 3 – Human Dignity and Human Rights 1. Human dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms are to be fully respected. 2. The interests and welfare of the individual should have priority over the sole interest of science or society. Article 6 – Consent 1. Any preventive, diagnostic, and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior,  free  and  informed  consent  of  the  person  concerned,  based  on  adequate  information.  The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice. (11) Clean  water,  sanitation,  flushing  toilets,  refrigerated  foods,  and  healthy  diets  have  done  and  still  do  far more to protect humanity from infectious diseases than any vaccine program. Doctors  and  the  vaccine  industry  have  usurped  credit  that  rightfully  belongs  to  plumbers,  electricians, sandhogs, engineers, and city planners.

For  these  reasons,  policymakers  at  all  levels  of  government  should  protect  the  human  rights  and individual liberties of individuals to opt­out of vaccine programs via exemptions. The hubris of the medical community will never go away. Policymakers need to know that vaccines like all medical interventions are not infallible. Vaccines are not magic. We all have different susceptibility to disease.  Human beings are not one size fits all. In 1918­19, the vaccine industry experimented on soldiers, likely with disastrous results. In  2018,  the  vaccine  industry  experiments  on  infants  every  day.  

The  vaccine  schedule  has  never  been tested as it is given.  The results of the experiment are in 1 in 7 of America’s fully vaccinated children is in some form of special education and over 50% have some form of chronic illness. (12) In 1918­19, there was no safety follow up after vaccines were delivered. In 2018, there is virtually no safety follow up after a vaccine is delivered. Who exactly gave you that flu shot at Rite Aid? Do you have their cell number of the store employee if something goes wrong? In 1918­19, there was no liability to the manufacturer for injuries or death caused by vaccines.

In  2018,  there  is  no  liability  for  vaccine  manufacturers  for  injuries  or  death  caused  by  vaccines,  which was formalized in 1986. (13) In 1918­19, there was no independent investigative follow up challenging the official story that “Spanish Flu” was some mystery illness that dropped from the sky.  I suspect that many of those at the Rockefeller Institute knew what happened and that many of the doctors who administered the vaccines to the troops knew what happened, but those people are long dead. In 2018, the Pharmaceutical industry is the largest campaign donor to politicians and the largest advertiser in all forms of media, so not much has changed over 100 years.

This story will likely be ignored by mainstream media because their salaries are paid by pharmaceutical advertising. The  next  time  you  hear  someone  say  “vaccines  save  lives”  please  remember  that  the  true  story  of  the cost/benefit  of  vaccines  is  much  more  complicated  than  their  three­word  slogan.   Also,  remember  that vaccines may have killed 50­100 million people in 1918­19.

If true, those costs greatly outweighed any benefit, especially considering that plumbers, electricians, sandhogs, and engineers did, and continue to do, the real work which reduces mortality from disease. Vaccines  are  not  magic.    Human  rights  and  bioethics  are  critically  important.    Policymakers  should understand the history of medical hubris and protect individual and parental human rights as described in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.——  

Kevin Barry is the President of First Freedoms, Inc. a 501.c.3.  He is a former federal attorney, a rep at the UN HQ in New York, and the author of Vaccine Whistleblower: Exposing Autism Research Fraud at the CDC.  Please support our work at www.firstfreedoms.org (http://www.firstfreedoms.org/) Originally published at FirstFreedoms.org. Reprinted with permission. Related

Did Rockefeller create the ‘Spanish Flu’ pandemic of 1918? (II) (https://news.fiar.me/2021/01/did­rockefeller­created­the­spanish­flu­pandemic­of­1918­ii/) The Dark History Of The Rockefellers And Their Impact On Humanity (https://news.fiar.me/2021/01/the­dark­history­of­the­rockefellers­and­their­impact­on­humanity/)

Rockefeller Institute - New York City

 References [1] Deaths from Bacterial Pneumonia during 1918–19 Influenza Pandemic  John F. Brundage*  and G. Dennis Shanks†  [2]  World Health Organization: Unsafe drinking water, sanitation, and waste management  http://www.who.int/sustainable­development/cities/health­risks/water­sanitation/en/ (http://www.who.int/sustainable­development/cities/health­risks/water­sanitation/en/)  [3] J Infect Dis. 2008 Oct 1; 198(7): 962–970.  Predominant Role of Bacterial Pneumonia as a Cause of Death in Pandemic Influenza: Implications for Pandemic Influenza Preparedness  David M. Morens, Jeffery K. Taubenberger, and Anthony S. Fauci  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2599911/ (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2599911/)  [4] PDF of Fort Riley Study (1918)  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2126288/pdf/449.pdf (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2126288/pdf/449.pdf)  [5] American Experience, “The First Wave”, PBS  https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/influenza­first­wave/ (https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/influenza­first­wave/)  [6] Mayo Clinic:  Meningitis  www.mayoclinic.org/diseases­conditions/meningitis/symptoms­causes/syc­20350508 (https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases­conditions/meningitis/symptoms­causes/syc­20350508)  [7] Public Health Rep. 2010; 125(Suppl 3): 82–91.  The U.S. Military and the Influenza Pandemic of 1918–1919  Carol R. Byerly, Ph.D.  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862337/ (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862337/)  [8] Rockefeller Institute pamphlet PDF (1919)  https://digitalcommons.rockefeller.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=rockefeller­institute­ descriptive­pamphlet  (https://digitalcommons.rockefeller.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi? article=1005&context=rockefeller­institute­descriptive­pamphlet)  [9]  Is  Military  Research  Hazardous  to  Veterans’  Health?  Lessons  Spanning  Half  a  Century,  A  Staff Report Prepared for the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, United States Senate, December 1994  https://www.hsdl.org/?abstract&did=438835 (https://www.hsdl.org/?abstract&did=438835)  [10]  Dr.  Stanley  Plotkin:  vaccine  experiments  on  orphans,  the  mentally  retarded,  and  others  (January 2018)  https://youtu.be/yevV_slu7Dw (https://youtu.be/yevV_slu7Dw)  [11]  Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (19 October 2005)  http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php­URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html (http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php­ URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html)  [12] CDC Offers New Stats On Disability Prevalence

https://www.disabilityscoop.com/2016/03/14/cdc­disability­prevalence/22034/ (https://www.disabilityscoop.com/2016/03/14/cdc­disability­prevalence/22034/)  [13] 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act  https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/childhood­vaccine­injury­act­protect/ (https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/childhood­vaccine­injury­act­protect/) About the author: Dr. Gary G. Kohls is a medical doctor working for most of his career as a rural, full­ service family practice physician. In 1984 he was awarded a Bush Foundation Medical Fellowship. In the early 1990s, Dr. Kohls worked at a Regional Treatment Center as a physician for psychiatric inpatients and  later  worked  at  a  psychological  services  clinic.  Now  retired,  he  continues  to  present  lectures  and seminars to healthcare professionals and the general public, as well as editing the popular e­newsletter Preventive Psychiatry E­Newsletter (PPEN). FRN  1918/)

(https://fort­russ.com/2020/05/did­psychopath­rockefeller­create­the­spanish­flu­pandemic­of­


COPYRIGHTS

Copy & Paste the link above for Yandex translation to Norwegian.

WHO and WHAT is behind it all ? : >

The bottom line is for the people to regain their original, moral principles, which have intentionally been watered out over the past generations by our press, TV, and other media owned by the Illuminati/Bilderberger Group, corrupting our morals by making misbehavior acceptable to our society. Only in this way shall we conquer this oncoming wave of evil.

Commentary:

Administrator

HUMAN SYNTHESIS

All articles contained in Human-Synthesis are freely available and collected from the Internet. The interpretation of the contents is left to the readers and do not necessarily represent the views of the Administrator. Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). Human-Synthesis will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. Human-Synthesis grants permission to cross-post original Human-Synthesis articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified