14 min read

Bill Gate's Puppet Theater

Helge Aspevik - 26 Feb. 2021  (Google translated from Norwegian)

I'm so tired of sitting and listening to this puppet show about the story of little Bill Gates who was to save the world with his magic syringe. I'm so tired of all the "experts", people, politicians who believe in this powerful show where he has pushed large sums into the pockets of the organizers of this show.

Take it once more, and that with a teaspoon. If people really understood how it all worked, then all the lies would have fallen apart because this is all this worldwide lie is based on. Everything depends on the virus not being able to be examined, absolutely everything. In order to know at all what the virus consists of, the base pairs in the genome must be examined. The genome is thus the virus sequence and probably consists of around 30,000 base pairs. Only 37 of these base pairs were examined and taken from crude material. 0.0001 percent of the entire virus sequence. The rest was calculated on a computer.

Cause? No isolation of the virus was available worldwide. Nor is it to this day, even if one stubbornly claims this. None of the known coronaviruses that we have had for at least 55 million years have ever been examined internally. The explanation is pretty simple, the viruses are not living organisms. They can neither absorb nourishment, move nor multiply on their own. Instead, they hijack the cells of other creatures and make them work for themselves. Without host cells, these viruses will die out and in any case not be able to multiply enough to produce a vaccine or enough to carry out an examination of the virus. Completely impossible, and everyone who knows a little about viruses knows this.

The politicians can not, and these "scientists" that the politicians come with, they can but lie on order to survive in the job. The whole thing is a disgrace to everything called science. Viruses can not be isolated, and thus not examined because one must have large amounts of virus to see what it consists of and how this is built up, and it must not contain any other DNA from other sources so that this mixes with the genome or the virus sequence. RNA is similar to the genetic material DNA and is found in all cells in all organisms. Most other researchers in the world know so well that viruses only replicate in the host cells when you try to grow them because without host cells, you just do not have the virus anymore. This is so easy! - " the virus during his stay there. It was this investigation that started the whole show so that Bill Gates' The virus was isolated, the virus was examined and the examination showed that this was very deadly and damaged the human tissue.

Yeah Al that sounds pretty crap to me, Looks like BT aint for me either, Looks like BT aint for me either, Looks like BT aint for me either, Looks like BT aint for me either, Looks like BT aint for me either, Looks like BT aint for me either. analyzed up to these 30,000 base pairs by straining a soup from the patient who came from Wuhan and suspected that he may have contractedOf course they can not, the explanation I have given over here. They themselves write that there was no isolated virus available anywhere in the world ... no, of course not because viruses do not exist at the moment they are separated from the host cells. If you manage to separate them, then they are finished and you are just as far.

So this study says that they took this soup, picked out 37 base pairs of the 30,000 assumed base pairs .... The virus' genetic material is fused with the host cell's genetic material, that is the problem here, no one can separate this from each other which is necessary to have this investigated at all. Not only that, in addition, this was grown in Vero cells in addition. One must therefore separate the genetic material from the virus from the genetic material in the DNA found in the host cells. These are completely fused together, and the virus multiplies by the mitosis of cell division.

This is part of what we call cell division and the virus uses this process to multiply via the host cells.

How have these suddenly managed this that no scientist in the world has managed before? We ask for a simple small pure macaroni without anything else added, and you are served the whole soup, mixed with another soup, along with a claim that this is just a simple small macaroni! Forget it! In the papers they took out a computer and therefore built a model, with 30,000 base pairs based on 37 base pairs that were picked out of this soup which they are trying to imagine the world was an isolated virus without genetic material from other human cells. Then they let the computers guess what these base pairs consisted of and afterwards a lot of "wise heads" came together and decided by consensus what was right and wrong. This has nothing to do with science.

Science is exact, not assumptions or guesswork. It's either right or wrong, not a democracy where the majority decides the right answer. When the report was finished, the CDC and all of them based on this survey and the puppet show of Bill Gates, began. The virus was deadly, and it becomes deadly when the host cells of the virus die. What does the research report say? Yes, they tried three experiments to see if this infected the human tissue, and none of the experiments did this. Yet one lied to say the opposite.

Why did you lie? The "scientific" report can be found here:

A lot of professionals participate in the puppet theater of Bill Gates. Together, these kneel behind the stage with their fists well up where the sun never shines on our politicians and health authorities and make them laugh off one lie after another. These are just the hand puppets in the big game and are controlled by those here who will benefit from these vaccines. This should be sold at all costs and you will not get your freedom back until you have taken the vaccine, even if it does not stop infection or infection. Just tell the whole story of their entire program. How many times have professionals not referred to eg this report above from the Public Health Laboratory Network (PHLN) is a collaborative group of laboratories, which has expertise and offers services in public health microbiology in Australia and New Zealand, which says the virus is isolated ...

WHO has this alleged virus that is isolated and purified from all other genetic material from DNA derived from the host cells?

Their report states: "Note: Cell containers of the Vero / hSLAM cell line, developed by Dr. Yusuke Yanagi and colleagues at Kyushu University, Japan, have been delivered to the GMRLN laboratories by the National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan, and is available in regional cell stores *. Vero / hSLAM cells are available on request (free of charge) through the WHO. "Here it is clear that it is not a purified and isolated virus you get, but Vero / hSLAM cells. You can not isolate and clean the virus no matter how much they claim it is.

Ergo, one can also never say the slightest what virus sequence this virus has in that the base pairs have fused with another base pair from DNA from the host cells.

No, the virus has not been cleaned at all. A virus has been removed and what we call Vero cells have been added to keep it alive by acting as vertebral cells instead of the human DNA that is also necessarily mixed in this soup. What are Vero cells, do you think? I can tell you that. These are cells extracted from the kidneys of an African green monkey (Chlorocebus) by all means.

These green monkeys have DNA like everything else.

You can read about other so-called alleged isolations, for example from Korea, but also here the soup is grown together with new soup by Vero cells and we get a juicy mixture of DNA and genetic material that does not look like anything. The virus is not isolated and cleaned for that reason.

One must nevertheless distinguish between the different base pairs after the fusion of genetic material and DNA has taken place during this process called mitosis in the actual cell division of the host cells.

It's not the virus itself I'm talking about that I call mitosis, it's about dead material it. Nevertheless, it uses mitosis to form more viruses. It uses cell division to reproduce. Living organisms either fix this on their own, for example by cell division, or they find a species friend with whom they can engage in sexual reproduction. But what does a virus do? To make more new virus copies, the virus hijacks living cells. The virus carries with it the genes it needs to make copies of itself. But it can not do it on its own. Therefore, they need the cell. Without host cells, the virus cannot copy itself. The virus uses the protein sheath to recognize and enter the cell. This is done by proteins in the virus sheath recognizing proteins on the cell surface, and the virus sneaks in. Once inside, the viral heirloom takes over control.

The virus' genetic material uses the cell's large well-functioning machinery to do all that the virus cannot do alone. On order from the virus, the cell begins to make large amounts of new virus coat protein and many new copies of the virus genetic material. The virus binds to a protein on the cell. Then it tricks the cell into producing more viral heirloom and new viral proteins. In this way, more viruses are formed. Professor Benjamin Howden and Dr. Mike Catton co-authored the article, "Isolation and rapid division of the new coronavirus from 2019 (SARS CoV-2) from the first patient diagnosed with COVID-19 in Australia." Vg writes this: Australian researchers have managed to isolate the Corona virus "Australian researchers are the first country outside China to have managed to isolate and cultivate the Corona virus," the Australian media wrote on Wednesday. "

The article is Updated January 29, 2020.

No, the virus is not isolated and cleaned in any way. If you are going to make a vaccine, this must once again be a completely pure virus free of all other DNA, at least cells from green monkeys. The research report from Professor Benjamin Howden and Dr Mike Catton also shows that this soup has been taken from human DNA and monkey DNA has been added and this is not pure enough to investigate the base pairs in this alleged virus. You can not weaken the virus and inject it back into humans either, it is just not clean enough and will never be. So ergo, one can not investigate what the structure of the virus itself consists of. Still, there is talk of mutations that are only becoming more and more contagious. It's all just part of this puppet show and Bill Gates' whole show, viruses mutate pretty fast all the time. Every time someone is infected, a new fusion takes place with the help of mitosis by mixing it with the human genetic material in the DNA, and the virus takes on a different form.

This has happened hundreds of thousands of times since one first discovered this alleged "virus" that one actually has no idea what it consists of.

Every time it mixes, this is washed out and becomes more and more involved in the base pairs from human DNA and thus it becomes more contagious and less deadly, so the virus gets more and more of the genetic material in DNA every time it passes someone's human body. What do you do to maintain infection rates? Yes, one only increases the testing continuously and includes groups such as children who have about zero chance of dying from this. Scientists know this, but the authorities, our politicians they use this to scare people who have no idea how this process works and this must be stopped. Science is herpes with the help of politically controlled research, and the dilemma of these scientists is that if they are to keep their pay, then they must participate in the whole show of Bill Gates who will now make money that no man in the Universe has done before him.


Helge Aspevik 5 dec. 2020

The name COVID-19 was first called by the WHO.

The CDC stated that they had now isolated the virus, and the entire virus sequence had been examined. It was established and with the help of scientific studies that this attacked the human tissue.

The report that came with this investigation tells something completely different from what was told. A virus was found from a man who never had any particular problems with this virus. He had been in China and was therefore upset when he heard about this new virus which is claimed to have come from bats and which had mutated with the coronavirus which has been around for at least 55 million years. A sample was taken that could not be cleaned. Based on this sample, an identical virus was found that had the same appearance on the outside as the well-known Corona virus.

One was to investigate whether the virus sequence was of a different type than the coronavirus, and thus one began to analyze the base pairs in the genome, ie the virus sequence. There are over 30,000 of them. this day. To fill into the rest of the virus sequence, then used a computer that took the remaining base pairs and replaced them with data from the existing Corona virus.  Afterwards, you took an an unclean sample, saw 37 of these base pairs, but did not move on because then you have to have a cleaned version of the virus, something you still do not have to they went out to say that all the base pairs had now been examined and they were now faced with a new virus that was very deadly. Looking at this in retrospect, this virus was not any more deadly at all compared to the Corona virus that is well known from before.

No wonder, they had only had the opportunity to examine 0.0001 percent of the virus sequence and the rest they have transferred the data from the Corona virus. So in reality, 99,999 percent of this so-called COVID 19 virus is actually a Coronavirus and nothing else. Most likely it is 100% of the virus. But ... at the same time it was said that this virus was so much more dangerous than the coronavirus. It attacked the human tissue. This was a direct lie that led the whole world to believe it, and it became the basis for this hysteria we have now. The media began to tell this, our politicians began to tell this, but this report tells something completely different than what was told. The truth is that three experiments were performed to see if this virus attacked this human tissue. All of the tests showed that this did not happen at all.

Nevertheless, the CDC stated that the tests showed that human tissue was attacked. The man who went out with this owns 50% of the vaccine patent, and it was of course in his interest that this virus was described as dangerous. The man is Antony Fauci, director of the CDC, which is responsible for the guidelines in connection with dealing with this "epidemic". The other half of the vaccine patent is owned by Bill Gates, and Antony Faci is heavily involved with this man in other contexts, he sits on the board of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

This entire COVID-19 board arose as a result of this investigation. But by looking at the report that came with the investigation, this clearly shows that one chose to lie to humanity. The scientists who have been aware of this were pretty quickly weeded out of the system, and they got the stamp "conspiracy theorists". The problem was that they all weeded out this way, and now doctors are gathering from all over the world to fight back against these lies. Here is the original report that came with the investigation that triggered the whole hysteria.

It tells something completely different from what Antony Fauci and well helped by the corrupt media went out with:

Can and mention the incident that set it all in motion. "A 35-year-old man who had recently returned from China presented a clinic in Washington State with a 4-day history of cough and subjective fever. new coronavirus outbreak in China apparently with similar symptoms as his own.

The patient visited the hospital voluntarily after hearing about a health warning due to an alleged  The medical examination indicated: body temperature (37.2 ° C); blood pressure 134/87 mm Hg; oxygen saturation 96%; breast radiography showed no abnormalities CDC staff decided to test the patient for 2019-nCoV (later renamed SARS-CoV-2) based on current CDC case definitions for “persons under investigation.” The patient was discharged from the hospital but was later called back when PCR his test gave a positive reading.

Treatment during this time was largely supportive. The patient received 650 mg of acetaminophen every 4 hours as needed and 600 mg of ibuprofen every 6 hours. He also received 600 mg of guaifenesin for continued cough and approx. 6 liters of normal saline during the first 6 days of hospitalization.

Treatment during this time was largely supportive. The patient received 650 mg of acetaminophen every 4 hours as needed and 600 mg of ibuprofen every 6 hours.

He also received 600 mg of guaifenesin for continued cough and approx. 6 liters of normal saline for the first 6 days of hospitalization. Given the potential for hospital-acquired pneumonia, treatment with vancomycin (a loading dose of 1750 mg followed by 1 g administered intravenously every 8 hours) and cefepime (administered intravenously every 8 hours) hour) started.CDC claimed that the patient's nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 via rRT-PCR analysis.The stool and both airways were also tested positive by rRT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2, while the serum remained negative.

Treatment with intravenous remdesivir (a new nucleotide analogue prodrug) was started in the evening on day 7, and no side effects were observed with the infusion. Vancomycin was discontinued in the evening on day 7, and cefepime was discontinued the following day. On hospital day 8 (disease day 12), the patient's clinical condition improved. Extra oxygen was eliminated, and his oxygen saturation values ​​improved to 94-96% as he breathed the air. The previous bilateral lower lobes were no longer present.

His appetite improved and he was asymptomatic except for intermittent dry cough and rhinorrhea. He was avebril, and all the symptoms have resolved with the exception of his cough, which was decreasing in severity. Given the case history, it is not clear why the patient was subjected to an rRT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 when he showed what would normally be diagnosed as a mild flu, and which could therefore be treated with antibiotics (according to the Australian answer).

Nevertheless, because the rRT-PCR test was positive, the assumption was that the patient had SARS-CoV-2 which led to the antiviral drug, remdesivir was (consequently) administered. The basic error here is that the patient should not have received an rRT PCR test to establish the presence of SARS-CoV-2, and this is because the rRT-PCR test is not a validated test, and can not be validated without an independently extracted physical reference sample of the virus, which has not been obtained to date. From a scientific point of view, and with regard to the case, no analyzes can be valid without an independently verified physical reference sample. infection / disease (COVID-19) is necessarily false. "

Therefore, the diagnosis and associated claim that the patient had SARS-CoV-2 and its associated .

WWWNC.CDC.GOV - Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States

The etiologic agent of an outbreak of pneumonia in Wuhan, China, was identified as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in January 2020.


Copy & Paste lenken øverst for Yandex oversettelse til Norsk.

WHO and WHAT is behind it all ? : >


The bottom line is for the people to regain their original, moral principles, which have intentionally been watered out over the past generations by our press, TV, and other media owned by the Illuminati/Bilderberger Group, corrupting our morals by making misbehaviour acceptable to our society. Only in this way shall we conquer this oncoming wave of evil.




All articles contained in Human-Synthesis are freely available and collected from the Internet. The interpretation of the contents is left to the readers and do not necessarily represent the views of the Administrator. Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). Human-Synthesis will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. Human-Synthesis grants permission to cross-post original Human-Synthesis articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified.

The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication of Human-Synthesis articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites. Human-Synthesis contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.