The World Economic Forum’s Annual Meeting of the Global Future Councils took place on November 11-12 in the United Arab Emirates. One of the topics discussed was “mind control using sound waves”. The WEF’s official website published an article entitled Mind control using sound waves? We ask a scientist how it works where University of Oxford Professor Antoine Jérusalem describes the technology and the issues related to it.

Controlling the brain with sound waves: how does it work?

Well, to get straight to the science, the principle of non-invasive neuromodulation is to focus ultrasound waves into a region in the brain so that they all gather in a small spot. Then hopefully, given the right set of parameters, this can change the activity of the neurons.

If you want to get rid of neurons that have gone wild, for example in epilepsy, then you might want to crank up the energy to essentially kill them. But if you want to selectively promote or block the neuronal activity, you need to fine-tune your ultrasound waves carefully.

In other words, there’s a difference between ultrasound stimulation used for removing tissue, and ultrasound neuromodulation, which is aimed at controlling neuronal activity without damaging the tissue.

Ultrasound neuromodulation is something that definitely works, but that we still don’t understand.

What social good can come of it?

The current buzzwords are Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, as well as traumatic brain injuries. But scientists are also looking at the spinal cord and peripheral nervous systems. As far as I am concerned, since the brain is the de facto centre of decision for so many processes, any of them could be targeted.

Is it safe?

When attempting to ‘control’ neuronal activity by providing minute mechanical vibrations to a region of the brain, it’s important that the focus of the ultrasound, frequency and amplitude are properly tuned, or the brain can potentially be damaged. The point is that we still don’t know how to tune all of this; and if I were to exaggerate a bit, I could say that our current approach is not that far off from fiddling around with the settings on a radio until we hear the right station.

One of the many difficulties is to know for sure that we are indeed controllingneurons with these sound waves, as opposed to damaging them. The truth is that we still don’t know how the process works. And if you don’t know how it works, you don’t know how much is “too much”.

What are the biggest ethical challenges?

The potential of this technique is huge – by that I mean the sheer number of applications, as well as the ethical use.

From a biological perspective, it’s similar to drugs. It can cure you, it can get you addicted, and it can kill you. It’s all about staying within a given set of rules. From an ethical perspective, the world is changing so fast that it’s difficult to assess what will be acceptable tomorrow that is not today.

I am also convinced that human nature is such that if something can be done, it will be done. The question is by whom. I would rather have a fair society leading the dance than some rogue state without any respect for human or animal life. If we want to lead that dance 10 years from now, we need to start researching today.

How dystopian could it get?

I can see the day coming where a scientist will be able to control what a person sees in their mind’s eye, by sending the right waves to the right place in their brain. My guess is that most objections will be similar to those we hear today about subliminal messages in advertisements, only much more vehement.

This technology is not without its risks of misuse. It could be a revolutionary healthcare technology for the sick, or a perfect controlling tool with which the ruthless control the weak. This time though, the control would be literal.

What can we do to safeguard its potential?

I am not going to argue that scientists are all wise and knowledgeable when it comes to what should and should not be done. Some of us will go as far as we can get away with. But that’s human nature, and not unique to scientists.

Either way, our job is to find something that is beneficial to humanity. And if you find a way to make somebody better, then you most likely also know how to do the contrary. The goal is to make sure that regulation prevents the latter, without impeding the former. I believe that this is the role of regulators. And I think that the European Union, where I work, is quite good at this.

Another role of politicians should be to provide a communication platform to explain the long vision of any given area of research. And it can be too early, or not a good idea, and the final decision might very well be to stop it. But in the long term, the public should have the potential benefits of a new technology explained to them in plain words, which is something that scientists are not necessarily good at.

Politicians should remember that if we don’t do it, then somebody somewhere will do it anyway…potentially unregulated.

In short, Antoine Jérusalem says that remote mind control is an incredibly powerful technology that has the power to possibly cure illnesses. However, in the wrong hands, the technology can completely take control of one’s brain. In his words, it can be the “perfect controlling tool with which the ruthless control the weak”.

That being said, remote mind control is nothing new and the elite had access to this kind of technology for years. A few months ago, I published an article about a leaked 1996 document describing remote mind control.

Despite the technology’s admitted dystopian potential, Antoine Jérusalem believes that humanity cannot avoid developing it. He probably says that because a company developing this technology is part of the WEF. His solution to make sure that the technology is not used to turn humans into mind control slaves? Government regulation.

In short, the World Economis Forum states that this technology should be under the control of the global elite. Does that comfort you?

Can they use 5G technology for mind control?

In April 2008 NASA partnered with GEOFF brown and machine to machine intelligence (M2Mi) corp ... to develop 5G communication technology, In an article by the EMF guru consultancy in the UK dated march 13 2017 Titled: 5G telecom radiation the perfect tool to mass modify human brain waves waking times. He stated that the FCC works purely on behalf of the telecoms industries in granting them access to the airwaves no more and no less. Nowhere in its document is mention made of consumer safety or well-being.

The implications of 5G on consumer well-being and safety do not look good for one reason, devices that will operate within the 5G electromagnetic spectrum will use very small antennas from a few millimeters to a centimeter in length. This means that the industry will be able to mass produce these antennas and place them all over, especially in Urban areas. The advantages in using very small antennas in the millimeter wavelength is you can feed many antennas in various configuration arrays for example vertical or horizontal arrays waveguide coned or highly directional beam type designs. These types of antenna design focus most of the transmitted power into specified directions and doesn't get blocked or cut off by structures.

In 2016 the reviewed medical and epidemiological studies that illustrate or correlate adverse biological effects with use of mobile phone technology or Wi-Fi. Using frequencies even higher than 5 GHz and up to 100 GHz will compress the timeframe in which cancers and other biological effects show themselves within society. It is anyone's guess on what might happen in terms of biological safety yet it is clear to see that the pulsed nature of these high frequency high signal intensity signals do not harbor good news for humanity particularly in relation to the functioning of our DNA.


Just like mobile phone technology, it is us the consumers to play the guinea pig role in terms of safety. The fact the telecom industry have not mentioned is that in order to develop an efficient network of signals within an urban environment many thousands of new transmitter sites will need to be installed. Because of the small size of these antennas, means they could be installed into all sorts of urban structures which suggest that for urban dwellers at least there will be no escape from exposure to these highly damaging microwave frequencies. I also feel that when these antennas are in place it will be relatively easy to alter and manipulate brain wave function of its users and others close by. The amount ancillary information that can be piped or attached to the main carrier frequency of such a telecommunications network system is potentially huge.

There is also the TETRA system: Mass UK mind control technology and zombification of Britain's Police has been a reality. From CH4 News, Feb 5th, 2001
The new Home Office microwave system called TETRA is to be the mainstay of British police force communications and will be placed in every major population centre. The British government spent 2 and a half billion pounds on a 400 MHz pulse modulated microwave transmitter network which broadcast 17.6 Hz into the brains of all Britain's police and anyone living near the planned transmitters, to be used by the CIA in research in optimal mind-control. Which the effects are disruption of neural networks, leading to behavioural and character changes also manic behavior, followed by nervous exhaustion, also disruption of higher brain function leading to the so called zombification to just name a few!

The TETRA system will also flood the New York and London underground, so commuters will regularly be exposed to behavioural modification during rush hour. This system will be used in all UK police departments and emergency services by the end of the year (this was 2001). 30,000 transmitters will be placed around the country to maximise the effects on the local UK population - mass mind control! anyone who has complained of these transmitters have received a letter from the Government informing them that if the transmitters are not positioned where the Government wishes, there can be no guarantee of police protection, which will lead to higher insurance premiums for homeowners.

Have you heard of Microwave Voice-To-Skull Technology?
United States Patent 4,877,027 Brunkan October 31, 1989

Sound is induced in the head of a person by radiating the head with microwaves in the range of 100 megahertz to 10,000 megahertz that are modulated with a particular waveform. The waveform consists of frequency modulated bursts. Each burst is made up of ten to twenty uniformly spaced pulses grouped tightly together. The burst width is between 500 nanoseconds and 100 microseconds. The pulse width is in the range of 10 nanoseconds to 1 microsecond. The bursts are frequency modulated by the audio input to create the sensation of hearing in the person whose head is irradiated.

The ‘psycho-electronic’ type of mind control I’m discussing here is the covert, around the clock harassment of innocent citizens living in their homes and communities, and is currently world wide in scope. This harassment includes electronic mind/body attacks, street harassment skits, destruction of family and other relationships and destruction of careers. Current-day voice to skull cannot be stopped by any known electromagnetic shielding, a fact which demonstrates how advanced classified mind control technology has become.

Just think about the technology for deaf people, they can hear (depending on their type of hearing loss) with a device called neurophones. The neurophones bypass the whole usual hearing process. Dr Patrick Flanagan has discovered an additional sense everybody has but that we usually do not use: we can hear through our skin. The neurophones makes small metal plates at the top of the electrodes vibrate. These vibrations are being transmitted to the skin as soon as the electrodes touch the skin. The skin then transfers the vibrations. The skin is our largest organ and has many nerve cells the work like little sensors. The received stimuli and the transfer stimuli to the brain, then the brain decodes. I don't want to get any deeper into that, this is a whole subject all by itself.

But I'm just trying to point out the fact that the technology is out there to manipulate people by the masses. I could see them using commercialized subliminal messages to encourage just can't stop thinking about shopping at macy's or i'm suddenly craving Apple Bee's. But that's small potatoes to how horribly wrong this technology could be used! On a personal note, I have a shungite stone on the back of my cell as a shield from the EMF.

I also have a shungite stone necklace and bracelet to help too! They're available online and you can also put it on all your appliances too! It's not the cure all but if it helps why not! Shungite has conductivity properties which is why they say that it shields and protects from EMF from things like tv's, computers, microwaves, cell phones and other items. They also say that it brings with it many healing energies, if you're into that sort of thing?

Something to consider and be aware of on this new journey of 5G technology.


WHO and WHAT is behind it all ? : >

The bottom line is for the people to regain their original, moral principles, which have intentionally been watered out over the past generations by our press, TV, and other media owned by the Illuminati/Bilderberger Group, corrupting our morals by making misbehavior acceptable to our society. Only in this way shall we conquer this oncoming wave of evil.




All articles contained in Human-Synthesis are freely available and collected from the Internet. The interpretation of the contents is left to the readers and do not necessarily represent the views of the Administrator. Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). Human-Synthesis will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. Human-Synthesis grants permission to cross-post original Human-Synthesis articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified.

The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication of Human-Synthesis articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites. Human-Synthesis contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.